Community Thread XXXIX In Honor of the 2012-2013 MVP Gek!!

EArl · Post #1081 » by **EArl** » Mon May 13, 2013 12:41 am

**** doesn't know his taxonomy. You always have to italicize the Species not the Genus.

Post #1082 » by **Slava** » Mon May 13, 2013 12:41 am

EArl wrote:Pan troglodyte shots fired.

I was briefly on the team that started the genome analysis of Pan troglodyte.

EArl · Post #1083 » by **EArl** » Mon May 13, 2013 12:42 am

SlavaMedvedenko wrote:
EArl wrote:Pan troglodyte shots fired.

I was on the team that started the genome analysis of Pan troglodyte.

That's some pretty cool stuff.

florencemachine · Post #1084 » by **florencemachine** » Mon May 13, 2013 12:45 am

EArl wrote:**** doesn't know his taxonomy. You always have to italicize the Species not the Genus.

you are a lost cause

EArl · Post #1085 » by **EArl** » Mon May 13, 2013 12:46 am

florencemachine wrote:
EArl wrote:**** doesn't know his taxonomy. You always have to italicize the Species not the Genus.

you are a lost cause

You will suffer a death due to Apicomplexan plasmodium.

ennui · Post #1086 » by **ennui** » Mon May 13, 2013 12:50 am

florencemachine wrote:the word you were after was arbitrary or superfluous, banal has a completely different connotation. nice try though. also my comment was completely justifiable because of this:

Tasp wrote:Those two are beautiful, but they don't make me horny. Its like all 90 degree angles, would be like sleeping on a bed of nails.

Olivia wilde especially, someone get that poor girl a sammich. Ssunken eyes aint where its at.

like actually the only conclusion i can draw is that you like fat bitches

either that or you're gay

1. Why you mad tho

2. Your comment was unoriginal hence the usage of banal. ive been called chubby chaser multiple times in this very series of threads. According to comm thread denizens I like fattys, np.

3. Buh srsly tho why u mad?

Post #1087 » by **Slava** » Mon May 13, 2013 12:54 am

Florence is one some pill rush

florencemachine · Post #1088 » by **florencemachine** » Mon May 13, 2013 1:00 am

Tasp wrote:
florencemachine wrote:the word you were after was arbitrary or superfluous, banal has a completely different connotation. nice try though. also my comment was completely justifiable because of this:

Tasp wrote:Those two are beautiful, but they don't make me horny. Its like all 90 degree angles, would be like sleeping on a bed of nails.

Olivia wilde especially, someone get that poor girl a sammich. Ssunken eyes aint where its at.

like actually the only conclusion i can draw is that you like fat bitches

either that or you're gay

1. Why you mad tho

2. Your comment was unoriginal hence the usage of banal. ive been called chubby chaser multiple times in this very series of threads. According to comm thread denizens I like fattys, np.

3. Buh srsly tho why u mad?

oh unaware of previous association with fatties. regardless, i feel for you. i've always wondered how fattie couples are attracted to each other. perhaps you can give me some insight???? do you find dem rolls attractive

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BE4tzfBZSE[/youtube] for slava

ennui · Post #1089 » by **ennui** » Mon May 13, 2013 1:01 am

Love u too Florence

Call me sometime

hermes · Post #1090 » by **hermes** » Mon May 13, 2013 1:08 am

florencemachine wrote:like actually the only conclusion i can draw is that you like fat bitches

either that or you're gay

*makes a note that everyone is either really skinny or really fat, no in between*

Post #1091 » by **TyCobb** » Mon May 13, 2013 1:08 am

I <3 granny smith apples + peanut butter

hermes · Post #1092 » by **hermes** » Mon May 13, 2013 1:09 am

i'm with ty

although i don't know if i have ever combined the two...

Post #1093 » by **TyCobb** » Mon May 13, 2013 1:11 am

Try it hermes, its pretty tasty.

ennui · Post #1094 » by **ennui** » Mon May 13, 2013 1:24 am

Go leafs baby

Cmon everyone leafs nation!

Gek · Post #1095 » by **Gek** » Mon May 13, 2013 1:41 am

florencemachine wrote:the word you were after was arbitrary or superfluous, banal has a completely different connotation. nice try though. also my comment was completely justifiable because of this:

while I wouldn't call your comment banal, i'd say the connotation was pretty spot on.

Gek · Post #1096 » by **Gek** » Mon May 13, 2013 1:42 am

TyCobb wrote:Try it hermes, its pretty tasty.

delicious. it's a crime not to have ever combined apples and peanut butter imo.

ennui · Post #1097 » by **ennui** » Mon May 13, 2013 1:46 am

Guys root for the leafs pls

We need all the help we can get

Gek · Post #1098 » by **Gek** » Mon May 13, 2013 1:49 am

What's in it for me?

ennui · Post #1099 » by **ennui** » Mon May 13, 2013 1:52 am

My humps my lumps my lovely lady lumps

EArl · Post #1100 » by **EArl** » Mon May 13, 2013 3:02 am

Gek wrote:
TyCobb wrote:Try it hermes, its pretty tasty.

delicious. it's a crime not to have ever combined apples and peanut butter imo.

Bananas and peanut butter are also good.

Get a banana and make a slit on the side and stuff with peanut butter.
You're welcome.