TyCobb wrote:
That could have easily been made to perfectly loop
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
TyCobb wrote:
Aki wrote:JohnVancouver wrote:You have to think Miami is a little worried though - Indy hung with them all the way.
i would say indy are a little worried.
miami hung with them all the way, and snatched even snatched victory from the jaws of defeat
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
DEEP3CL wrote:@Aki & EArl......there is no curse, the Spurs got lucky as hell in Game 2. I'm still not sold on the Spurs dominating this series, I see too many damn holes in their arsenal. Tony Allen called it in an article I read today, Tony Parker is the head you have to cut off to kill the Spurs. If Allen checks TP from the jump Game 3 could be different.







+
=
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
DEEP3CL wrote:Aki and EArl........you guys are too funny. And you both seem to love the Spurs chances way too much. I've seen their act way too long, once Memphis figures out Parker or decides to put clamps on him you'll see them struggle.
Are both of you really watching the game within the game ?
Memphis talked about it today, they seem to know what they have to do. And that's the funny thing about 7 game series, just takes a short minute to catch up to schemes. Memphis have toyed with the Spurs in the past, they're not just going to suddenly dummy up for no reason.

Damn straight........but some weed head will think otherwise.Doormatt wrote:indy really should be up 2-0
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
Aki wrote::xscrew this, let's THROW DOWN!!!
![]()
![]()
still rather risk it and make nash shoot more knowing he's a better shooter than kobe
still semi-efficient compared to lebron.
kobe is more reliant on efficient scorers than lebron. i mentioned pau/odom/bynum as a trio because, inconsistent as LO/pau/bynum were individually; 1 (or more) of them on most nights would give an efficient scoring night and the trio would end up with an overall efficient scoring night (ie. throw all their scores together and treat them as one entity)
do you believe that having a LO/pau/bynum trio as a big man rotation contributed more or less to the overall success than kobe? because i do; because i believe championships are built off the backs of big men, which has been true historically
and don't get me wrong, i personally believe kobe was the best player on those teams, but given a choice between LO/pau/bynum vs kobe? i'd pick the trio to build a championship side over kobe and try to pick up perimeter players later
historically, players were able to volume score closer to the basket have better TS%. kobe is semi-efficient due to his style of play. he has efficient players he doesn't utilise as much as he probably should.
lebron is efficient due to his style of play, has less efficient players on his team. if i were spoelstra, i'd tell lebron to keep shooting and take even more shots away from wade and bosh right up until lebron's TS% falls off a cliff and tell him to pull back a bit (and right there, is mike brown in cleveland)