ImageImageImageImageImage

Why are we targeting lebron?

Moderators: Danny Darko, TyCobb, Kilroy

RingsDontLie
Veteran
Posts: 2,670
And1: 1,359
Joined: May 11, 2015

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#121 » by RingsDontLie » Thu Jul 27, 2017 11:28 pm

danfantastk32 wrote:
Pythagoras wrote:
detlef_schrempf wrote:
He will still be the best player in the league for at least three more years. Probably more.

He is an athletic freak.


I don't know that I buy him being the best player now, but he's definitely not gonna be the best player in the league for 3 more years, and certainly not more. That's absurd.


I too question best player in 3 years....but I have him on top as of now. But even if he's not the best player.....he's gonna be top-10, wouldnt you agree (barring major injury...but that goes for anyone)? When you combine his willingness to pass, his overall utility...and his defense, I don't know why the Lakers wouldn't take him on a 3-4 year deal. Yeah....that 4th year might kinda bite you, but whatever. I also see him still being a damn good player at 37.


37 is really up there for what he tries to do on the court. His game involves a lot of physicality and explosiveness. Without that he is very limited as a jump shooter. That explosiveness you start losing fast by your 30s, and definitely mid-thirties.

Top 10 is possible. I think he has the skillset and IQ to be a top 10 guy in 3 years. But I don't think he's the top guy right now. That is clearly Durant, with LBJ as the close 2nd, and Curry at 3rd. Westbrook, Harden, Anthony Davis, Kawhi will be locking LeBron out of the top 5 pretty soon. But other than those guys there is a steep drop off from there, so Lebron should maintain top 7 or 8 I think in 3 years unless Kyrie, PG13, Lillard, and these 2nd tier/3rd tier guys start having special seasons. Not to mention Lonzo Ball, we don't know what kind of impact he'll have initially either, he's another guy that could put Lebron outside the top 10 in 3 years.
danfantastk32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,351
And1: 2,106
Joined: Dec 20, 2015
     

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#122 » by danfantastk32 » Thu Jul 27, 2017 11:50 pm

Pythagoras wrote:Definitely agree top 10. I have 4 major questions regarding LBJ coming:

How much is he gonna have left?
How would his game adjust to having the ball in his hands less?
How much is his desire to come here based on wanting to add himself to the Lakers Mount Rushmore and win a title, vs setting himself up for life after basketball?
How would he, Ingram, and PG fit? (Who's gonna be the 2, who's gonna be the 3, and who's gonna be the 4?)


I'll lump question 1 and 2 together. So assuming 2 things: A) we get lebron and PG....and B) That Ingram / Ball either live up to expectations....or at least become sorta 'fringe all-star' guys. In other words....better than average players.

Assuming those 2 things, I don't think Lebron would have to expel too much during the regular season. More than ever, this league is "have and have-nots"....so that team would just have to show up, and it'd be a 4th - 5th seed. Lebron could take games off, and we'd be fine. I think he'd welcome the lesser load....and just let Lonzo run things, and be a 'glue' guy. If the team needs boards...he work boards...if they needed points, he do points. The season would be a cake-walk.

For question 4...it would prob be situational. I'd put PG against Klay @ the 2. Put Ingram on Durant @3, and have Lebron on Green @ the 4. Ball vs Curry, and Lopez on Zaza. Diferent teams would go other ways. Another thing I'd do (which ties into question 1 as well) is have it so Lebron / Ingram / PG play the 2 and the 3.....and have 2 of the 3 out there at all times. Prob have to finish with all 3 the last 5-6 minutes of the game....but you could could essentially play them about 32-33 minutes....have any combo of the 2 out there at all times, and finish the game with all 3.

Question 3 is open for debate. If he wants to "set himself up for life" then stay in Cleveland, and take the super-duper max contract. What his motives are....who truly knows? I mean...we don't even know he wants to come here. What are PG's motives?

We've been a 20-win team the last 4 years. If Lebron wants to come here....I'm totally cool with it.
Dloading99
Pro Prospect
Posts: 814
And1: 162
Joined: Jun 26, 2017

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#123 » by Dloading99 » Fri Jul 28, 2017 2:17 am

Windhorst has always been a homer for Cleveland same thing with Chrius Broussard these guys just can't say anything about Lebron going to the Lakers they can't see it and don't want to say or see any scenario where he is a Laker.


Broussard went on a big rant how he doesn't understand the whole L.A. thing saying they won't be good but not mentioning with Lonzo Ingram Lopez and Lebron that is a very good contending team with way more versatility then Cleveland.


Also Windhorst is trying to create some narrative like Kobe was secretly telling Kyrie he needs to leave Cleveland so he can have his own team and have greatness and be great like him. talking about how he had Shaq go to another team and how he became great being the mamba having his own team.

it's all bull it's like Windhorst is trying to get Lebron to get mad at Kobe and the Lakers and start some beef like Kobe is the one behind this with Mamba mentality.


it's so stupid Kobe is in Newport Beach with Vanessa storytelling he could care less about this drama. does Kobe advice players yes. he probably told Kyrie be more aggressive maybe. who knows. they are all Nike guys it's so dumb.

and windhorst is being so unprofessional.



Here are the facts. Lebron is going to meet with teams. probably go like this Lakers Suns Cavs Heat Sixers Nuggets Knicks


And Lebron is going to pick the best basketball situation. the best place where he can win championships with. players who will compliment his game.

Phoenix Bledsoe Booker Chriss Jackson Young guys he can play with

Lakers Ball Ingram Lopez Randle Young guys he can play with. he wants to beat the Warriors. he needs the right compliment of players to do what he does. that's why I mentioned Lopez because Lebron has to always and likes to play with a stretch four or five like a Love so Lopez compliments that part of his game. Ball is a point guard he's never played with but would make his job easier him not having to handle the ball and being a finisher like in Miami when he played the best basketball of his career. and Ingram is a young lengthy player who can handle shoot finish and is a shooting guard which he would play or three with Lebron who can give him length he needs to defend unlike a Jr Smith.

So we are in play. Magic Savannahs desire to be in L.A. and Hey LEBRON IS A BILLIONAIRE he calls his own shots. just don't let him run the team where he's shipping off players and your good.


I said this in the forum earlier in one of my posts you can't allow Lebron to do an Andrew Wiggins type trade where he trades a Ball or Ingram for an established star he wants to win now with. that player can be anyone from Anthony Davis to a Bradley Beal.
sonic the laker
Junior
Posts: 345
And1: 221
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
 

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#124 » by sonic the laker » Fri Jul 28, 2017 6:04 am

I, too, am curious as to why there are those that feel the Lakers NEED LeBron. Did Golden State need LeBron to win 2 championships? No. They did it organically...for the first one. Granted, the second one was courtesy of organic, plus Kevin Durant. But, the premise remains the same, especially seeing as how the time when they lost against LeBron, the Warriors were up 3-1, and then just gave up the ghost.

I believe the Lakers can do something similar, by growing the young talent they have, being patient, and filling in holes where necessary.

Brandon Ingram
Lonzo Ball
Juluis Randle
Larry Nance Jr.
Jordan Clarkson
Kyle Kuzma
Josh Hart
Thomas Bryant
Ivica Zubac (though SL has raised concerns)

and signing promising FA's like KCP, Ennis, and Caruso. Recent trade acquisition Brook Lopez should provide steady offense at the C position. Luol Deng, and Corey Brewer can help provide veteran leadership.

With growth from last year, this team looks poised to have a break out year. Like last years team, this new Laker team still sports depth, with a talented bench. And, if PG13 decides to stay in OKC, depending on how KCP plays with this sqaud, he may not be a bad plan B.

Who needs LeBron, honestly? On paper, it may SEEM like a great idea to some, but in practice...that's just a huge chemistry changer. Paul George just seems like an easier fit, than LeBron, hypothetically.


ZOOM!!!!!!!!
ZOOM!!!!!!!!!
danfantastk32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,351
And1: 2,106
Joined: Dec 20, 2015
     

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#125 » by danfantastk32 » Fri Jul 28, 2017 6:10 am

Dloading99 wrote:I said this in the forum earlier in one of my posts you can't allow Lebron to do an Andrew Wiggins type trade where he trades a Ball or Ingram for an established star he wants to win now with. that player can be anyone from Anthony Davis to a Bradley Beal.


I don't think Magic will be shy about telling Lebron that he can have a seat at the table....but the Lakers aren't trading away Ball for some dude he wants. Magic has his own ego, and to be honest....we don't NEED Lebron. It would be awesome to get him...but whatever. We're doing our thing. Even if we get Lebron....that's no guarantee we beat GS. That team is stupid-loaded.

We need to worry about our own house right now. We're coming off (ANOTHER) total sh** season. We got new management (thank god) and I think we got some damn promising draftees this year....and I also have hopes that Lopez will be a great fit. We need to worry about that first, and foremost. Let our team do the selling. If Lebron wants to come be apart of it...great. If he want's to make it HIS team....I don't think Magic will hesitate to tell him this isn't the place for him (unlike the prior goof-troop who'd be tripping over themselves trying to reach the phone to say "it's a deal!!!"). We have legit leadership in our FO now.

I also think Lebron found some inner peace when he won that title in Cleveland. It's not that he doesnt care now...or anything..but I think the whole "championship or bust" thing is out of his system.

Either way....it don't matter. We gotta let our play do the talking/selling. We'll take it from there.
danfantastk32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,351
And1: 2,106
Joined: Dec 20, 2015
     

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#126 » by danfantastk32 » Fri Jul 28, 2017 6:44 am

sonic the laker wrote:Who needs LeBron, honestly? On paper, it may SEEM like a great idea to some, but in practice...that's just a huge chemistry changer. Paul George just seems like an easier fit, than LeBron, hypothetically.


Agree we don't NEED Lebron, but I disagree with the rest. What's PG ever done?

Why would you think he's a better fit? Cause he's 4-5 years younger? He shoots the same amount of shots, but for worse % and has 3.3 assists to Lebrons 8.7 assists. 8.7 fits our team much better. Honesstly...I think PG would be the bigger chemistry changer.

I mean....there's really no arguing the stats. Lebron is all-around a considerably better player than PG. But more importantly....let's talk about leadership. Where's PG ever gone? Who's he made better? All the title-stuff aside.....I think Lebron could really, REALLY teach our young squad a ton. 3-4 seasons with him would be tremendous. I can't say the same for PG. Maybe he helps...maybe not. He hasn't done alot for the Pacers.

For the record...I'd like to sign them both. I think PG is a great player. But if I'm comparing the 2....there's really no comparison.
sonic the laker
Junior
Posts: 345
And1: 221
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
 

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#127 » by sonic the laker » Fri Jul 28, 2017 7:03 am

danfantastk32 wrote:
sonic the laker wrote:Who needs LeBron, honestly? On paper, it may SEEM like a great idea to some, but in practice...that's just a huge chemistry changer. Paul George just seems like an easier fit, than LeBron, hypothetically.


Agree we don't NEED Lebron, but I disagree with the rest. What's PG ever done?

Why would you think he's a better fit? Cause he's 4-5 years younger? He shoots the same amount of shots, but for worse % and has 3.3 assists to Lebrons 8.7 assists. 8.7 fits our team much better. Honesstly...I think PG would be the bigger chemistry changer.

I mean....there's really no arguing the stats. Lebron is all-around a considerably better player than PG. But more importantly....let's talk about leadership. Where's PG ever gone? Who's he made better? All the title-stuff aside.....I think Lebron could really, REALLY teach our young squad a ton. 3-4 seasons with him would be tremendous. I can't say the same for PG. Maybe he helps...maybe not. He hasn't done alot for the Pacers.

For the record...I'd like to sign them both. I think PG is a great player. But if I'm comparing the 2....there's really no comparison.



In all honesty, I don't believe need Paul George, either. When I say that I believe that PG would be a better fit, than LeBron, it's not something that can be translated via stats. Head to head, LeBron is the better overall player. But, the reason I believe PG would be a better fit, is because I believe PG's game is more "adaptable" than LeBron's. PG is a better shooter, and I believe would be more open/able to playing off ball, than LeBron. Also, PG comes with less "baggage" than LeBron. I know it's LA, but still....

And, our Lakers have a plethora of champions to draw wisdom from. From guys like Kareem and Magic, to Walton and Kobe. I don't think LeBron has anything to add, that would trump what's already here, in that regards.

Honestly, hoping that the young guys do so well, that they change the FO's mindset about NEEDING a LeBron to "speed the rebuilding process".


ZOOM!!!!!!!
ZOOM!!!!!!!!!
danfantastk32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,351
And1: 2,106
Joined: Dec 20, 2015
     

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#128 » by danfantastk32 » Fri Jul 28, 2017 9:21 am

sonic the laker wrote: And, our Lakers have a plethora of champions to draw wisdom from. From guys like Kareem and Magic, to Walton and Kobe. I don't think LeBron has anything to add, that would trump what's already here, in that regards.


I don't know about that man....you think any of these kids were alive the last time Kareem won a title? What about Magic? Lebron won a title 14 months ago. He was in the finals 60-70 days ago.

But more so....Lebron's in the fox-hole with you. Kareem and Magic might impart some words of wisdom....but I'm talking about workouts....pregame....huddles. How Lebron approaches defense.....the way he points to a broken assignment. All that stuff on the floor. The way Lebron sees the game is in tune with the modern game. But he's also there.....real time.

I do think having Lebron here for a 3-4 year stint would be HUGE for our young guys (almost everyone). About the only draw-back I see.....is it completely takes the team away from Ball. But...I'd make the argument that the same goes for signing PG.

But look back at Kobe: When they traded Shaq....and this officially became "Kobe's team" he was only like 24ish years old. But he was also battle-hardened from several years of deep, deep playoff runs. I see the same here. If we signed Lebron for 4 years...Ball and Ingram would be about 24. But thanks to Lebron.....we're IMMEDIATELY playing 2-3 series deep into playoffs....instead of dickin around with 32 wins, then 39 wins, then 46 wins (our first playoff birth) or however it goes. You get his experience, and all his influence....but you also get the experience of 4 years of being a legit contender....and all that goes with that.

I dunno man.....I agree that we'll make it without the guy. But I also think he helps in many many ways. If he wants to come here, I think we'd be fools to turn it down. He's gonna help this young squad a TON in so many different ways. I see Lebron coming and holding that role, as apposed to PG, who would be here to win a title...and be the star. Nothing against PG...but He'd be the guy more likely to have guys moved, IMO than Lebron....who's at a different point in his career.

I could be fooling myself on that last part...but I just don't see this as a 'ring chase' for Lebron, or him coming here to make this 'his team'....or any of that. I think his reasons are non-basketball. We'd just be the beneficiaries of his talents.
sonic the laker
Junior
Posts: 345
And1: 221
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
 

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#129 » by sonic the laker » Fri Jul 28, 2017 5:54 pm

danfantastk32 wrote:
sonic the laker wrote: And, our Lakers have a plethora of champions to draw wisdom from. From guys like Kareem and Magic, to Walton and Kobe. I don't think LeBron has anything to add, that would trump what's already here, in that regards.


I don't know about that man....you think any of these kids were alive the last time Kareem won a title? What about Magic? Lebron won a title 14 months ago. He was in the finals 60-70 days ago.

But more so....Lebron's in the fox-hole with you. Kareem and Magic might impart some words of wisdom....but I'm talking about workouts....pregame....huddles. How Lebron approaches defense.....the way he points to a broken assignment. All that stuff on the floor. The way Lebron sees the game is in tune with the modern game. But he's also there.....real time.

I do think having Lebron here for a 3-4 year stint would be HUGE for our young guys (almost everyone). About the only draw-back I see.....is it completely takes the team away from Ball. But...I'd make the argument that the same goes for signing PG.

But look back at Kobe: When they traded Shaq....and this officially became "Kobe's team" he was only like 24ish years old. But he was also battle-hardened from several years of deep, deep playoff runs. I see the same here. If we signed Lebron for 4 years...Ball and Ingram would be about 24. But thanks to Lebron.....we're IMMEDIATELY playing 2-3 series deep into playoffs....instead of dickin around with 32 wins, then 39 wins, then 46 wins (our first playoff birth) or however it goes. You get his experience, and all his influence....but you also get the experience of 4 years of being a legit contender....and all that goes with that.

I dunno man.....I agree that we'll make it without the guy. But I also think he helps in many many ways. If he wants to come here, I think we'd be fools to turn it down. He's gonna help this young squad a TON in so many different ways. I see Lebron coming and holding that role, as apposed to PG, who would be here to win a title...and be the star. Nothing against PG...but He'd be the guy more likely to have guys moved, IMO than Lebron....who's at a different point in his career.

I could be fooling myself on that last part...but I just don't see this as a 'ring chase' for Lebron, or him coming here to make this 'his team'....or any of that. I think his reasons are non-basketball. We'd just be the beneficiaries of his talents.



I get where're you're coming from with the "fox hole" analogy. And, granted, could be some value in that kid of approach. But, imo, not enough to offset the negatives LeBron would bring with him. The last time LeBron went to an organization that had a FO with a firm leadership style, was Miami. And, that lasted 4 yrs, before he got tired of them. I'm convinced his leaving had as much to do with him not viewing that team as good enough for him any longer, as much as Pat Riley not being as ingratiating to LeBron's crew as LeBron expects.

And, I'll have to still disagree with your idea that LeBron would be a fit, over PG. EVERY team LeBron has been on has had to adjust to him, as opposed to the other way around. And, people seem to see this as conventional wisdom, because of LeBron's dominant status. I honestly don't believe that Jeanie, Magic, or Pelinka would bow to LeBron like Dan Gilbert has, so I'm not really worried about the off court stuff. But, players like Lonzo, BI, and others would most likely have to change how they play to suit LeBron. I think that would stunt their growth, as opposed to help them grow. Unless, LeBron opts to take a backseat...and that ain't happening.

PG's personality isn't nearly as dominating as LeBron's...on, or off, the court. PG would be the resident superstar on the team, but I can see him trying to blend in more, because he doesn't have an image to project/protect, or any ulterior motivations, other than winning. As you said earlier, LeBron coming here would not be all about winning, to him. Not saying that the Lakers wouldn't have a title chance, with LeBron. I actually believe the Lakers will have that chance, without LeBron. But, there are other teams have more known star power, that he could join...if all he wanted to do, was win.

I honestly think that perhaps there's some master plan for him to possibly join the Rockets in the next offseason, hinging on if Carmelo can force his way there, as well. Wouldn't surprise me, if that happened.


ZOOM!!!!!!!
ZOOM!!!!!!!!!
danfantastk32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,351
And1: 2,106
Joined: Dec 20, 2015
     

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#130 » by danfantastk32 » Fri Jul 28, 2017 11:35 pm

sonic the laker wrote:I honestly think that perhaps there's some master plan for him to possibly join the Rockets in the next offseason, hinging on if Carmelo can force his way there, as well. Wouldn't surprise me, if that happened.


I too find it suspicious that Carmello ONLY wants to goto Houston (could be the addition of CP3, but MAN he suddenly seems hell-bent). I wanna see them figure out that salary though. I don't see that happening.

Anyhow...you bring up some good points, but I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one.
Dloading99
Pro Prospect
Posts: 814
And1: 162
Joined: Jun 26, 2017

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#131 » by Dloading99 » Sat Jul 29, 2017 2:30 am

We have to be prepared to not get Lebron.


I mentioned the Houston thing being suspicious when Chris Paul gave up the money to not have a max deal. and why Chris Paul was so quick to go to Houston to play with James Harden.

Why all of a sudden Melo was so quick to waive that no trade clause to go to Houston.


We know these guys talk. we know their good friends. very easy for them to say just get there. Lebron can say hey I'm a billionaire I can give some money up to make this work. one two year deal.

They'll find a way to get creative. and then we see Chris Paul James Harden Carmelo Anthony and Lebron James.

So we'll be in play but if Houston can free up some money and make it work. they'll get that meeting. everybody on Houston was just so sure to get Chris Paul that they can compete it was puzzling. We all also know how nice that Houston Club scene is and I'm talking about Strip Clubs. for some reason every NBA player likes going there. it's a lot of stuff to do in Houston.


That's why I think the Lakers have to have a real scenario where they have to say and go to their fans we are resigning Brook Lopez and Randle and we are building through Ball Ingram and Randle with Kuzma still part of winning team. maybe they only sign one superstar. Lebron always knows the teams that are in play. he's running the league. and he knows every team is going to see what he does. so here we go again Lebron TV should be fun. maybe we can get Jennifer Lawrence to host it.
Jody Smokz
Starter
Posts: 2,447
And1: 1,463
Joined: May 20, 2015
 

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#132 » by Jody Smokz » Sun Jul 30, 2017 8:29 am

Lol at the idea of a lottery team not needing 1 or both of one who is top 2-3 of all time to ever play and another thats arguably a top 10 player in the game when playing well...
loveshaq786
Pro Prospect
Posts: 983
And1: 86
Joined: Jun 03, 2012

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#133 » by loveshaq786 » Sun Jul 30, 2017 8:43 am

We don't want LeBron, kyrie, pg,.... who the eff do we want? Other people might be thinking of us as indecisive or (Please Use More Appropriate Word).

I'm with you Jody.
NBAWestFan
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,415
And1: 128
Joined: Mar 20, 2006

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#134 » by NBAWestFan » Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:21 pm

sonic the laker wrote:I, too, am curious as to why there are those that feel the Lakers NEED LeBron. Did Golden State need LeBron to win 2 championships? No. They did it organically...for the first one. Granted, the second one was courtesy of organic, plus Kevin Durant. But, the premise remains the same, especially seeing as how the time when they lost against LeBron, the Warriors were up 3-1, and then just gave up the ghost.

I believe the Lakers can do something similar, by growing the young talent they have, being patient, and filling in holes where necessary.

Brandon Ingram
Lonzo Ball
Juluis Randle
Larry Nance Jr.
Jordan Clarkson
Kyle Kuzma
Josh Hart
Thomas Bryant
Ivica Zubac (though SL has raised concerns)

and signing promising FA's like KCP, Ennis, and Caruso. Recent trade acquisition Brook Lopez should provide steady offense at the C position. Luol Deng, and Corey Brewer can help provide veteran leadership.

With growth from last year, this team looks poised to have a break out year. Like last years team, this new Laker team still sports depth, with a talented bench. And, if PG13 decides to stay in OKC, depending on how KCP plays with this sqaud, he may not be a bad plan B.

Who needs LeBron, honestly? On paper, it may SEEM like a great idea to some, but in practice...that's just a huge chemistry changer. Paul George just seems like an easier fit, than LeBron, hypothetically.


ZOOM!!!!!!!!



I have been saying I don't want him but others say he sell tickets. But he will only we here two years and will gut the team
or leave it so that it will takes years to rebuild.

Lebron is Ball dominant player who is older now and has to play the half court game where several of the players become spectators.
He has to have to superstars and several shooters who basically stand and play D.
His type of basketball does not get the most of of each of the 5 players on the court.

The Spurs and The Warriors play a team ball where everyone contributes on both sides of the floor and that is why there teams
are successful.
Dloading99
Pro Prospect
Posts: 814
And1: 162
Joined: Jun 26, 2017

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#135 » by Dloading99 » Mon Jul 31, 2017 11:13 pm

ITS LEBRON JAMES I don't care what anybody says in here if LEBRON JAMES wants to come to the Lakers the best player in the NBA we are signing him. fit whatever it's LEBRON KING JAMES LONZO INGRAM they'll make it work. 4 rings. lets' get us one. let's get them one. SHAQ was the best player in the world when he came. I want LEBRON I don't care what anybody says in here. if we can get Lebron bring him. here. he still plays the best basketball in the league. he can play defense and score the game 7 against Golden state perfect example. but I don't need to say anymore it's LEBRON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
larry14r
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,265
And1: 131
Joined: Jun 08, 2006

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#136 » by larry14r » Tue Aug 1, 2017 12:16 am

Dloading99 wrote:ITS LEBRON JAMES I don't care what anybody says in here if LEBRON JAMES wants to come to the Lakers the best player in the NBA we are signing him. fit whatever it's LEBRON KING JAMES LONZO INGRAM they'll make it work. 4 rings. lets' get us one. let's get them one. SHAQ was the best player in the world when he came. I want LEBRON I don't care what anybody says in here. if we can get Lebron bring him. here. he still plays the best basketball in the league. he can play defense and score the game 7 against Golden state perfect example. but I don't need to say anymore it's LEBRON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Well good luck to him because Golden State will be hell bent to make sure LeBron never sees a finals again.
Dloading99
Pro Prospect
Posts: 814
And1: 162
Joined: Jun 26, 2017

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#137 » by Dloading99 » Tue Aug 1, 2017 4:14 am

it would be a fun western conference finals.

Lakers warriors. I could see Lakers getting one with Lebron and Lonzo and Ingram. and Lopez. the Warriors playing the new Warriors.
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 13,493
And1: 4,756
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#138 » by pipfan » Sun Aug 6, 2017 3:10 am

As a Bulls fan, I don't care.

But I think you guys have to go after LBJ-all out. He is still a HUGE name, and will be a top 5 guy for a few more years.

Ball/George/Ingram/LBJ/? that team, assuming Ingram and Ball are studs, could be a top team
ISayshowmee
Veteran
Posts: 2,954
And1: 1,696
Joined: Feb 27, 2017

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#139 » by ISayshowmee » Sun Aug 6, 2017 4:15 am

Stay young Lakers......go for PG13 and Cousins !!
Tee212
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,782
And1: 423
Joined: Jan 10, 2009

Re: Why are we targeting lebron? 

Post#140 » by Tee212 » Sun Aug 6, 2017 5:24 am

hope the clippers get lb, he can make history winning a ring for them

Return to Los Angeles Lakers