COMM THREAD XVII IN HONOR OF STHU AND POST

LaLa · Post #1321 » by **LaLa** » Sun Oct 2, 2011 7:07 am

Wassup my peeps?

Doormatt · Post #1322 » by **Doormatt** » Sun Oct 2, 2011 8:28 am

Anybody have the battlefield 3 beta for xbox? If not, download it (for free) and I will pwn noobs with you. Just went 50-22 in my first day of ever playing any battlefield game, pretty boss.

tugs · Post #1323 » by **tugs** » Sun Oct 2, 2011 9:27 am

my bad. it was Gek who posted the link. thought it was Slav. thanks Gek and Slav! :thumbsup:

LaLa · Post #1324 » by **LaLa** » Sun Oct 2, 2011 9:35 am

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p74sRyhPNaU[/youtube]
you’ll never be me partner so it don’t f-cking matter
you try to be and your career will see funerals
and be you thats what it sounds, beautiful

Gek · Post #1325 » by **Gek** » Sun Oct 2, 2011 3:08 pm

tugs wrote:my bad. it was Gek who posted the link. thought it was Slav. thanks Gek and Slav!

?... You're welcome though I suppose.

Just parked myself in Hogwarts for the day. Let's go homework!!

Post #1326 » by **Slava** » Sun Oct 2, 2011 7:24 pm

Cardinals' best pitcher by far, Carpenter is starting the game today vs Phillies. Hope they can stretch this series a bit.

Jetset · Post #1327 » by **Jetset** » Sun Oct 2, 2011 9:28 pm

I'm hoping Lee secures the win, I want to get out of this series as fast as possible. I don't feel comfortable going up against Berkman, Pujols, and Holliday. If we lose tonight there's a chance we could lose the series because Oswalt is washed up and Hamels still isn't right from his injury.

Doormatt wrote:Anybody have the battlefield 3 beta for xbox? If not, download it (for free) and I will pwn noobs with you. Just went 50-22 in my first day of ever playing any battlefield game, pretty boss.

Thinking of buying a new Xbox. My old one copped the red ring and I have yet to buy a new one. Also thinking about going the PS3 route as well. Either way it won't be until Tuesday.

Post #1328 » by **Slava** » Sun Oct 2, 2011 10:51 pm

Pujols has really been nothing special this season. Berkman and Holliday are more dangerous.

Gek · Post #1329 » by **Gek** » Sun Oct 2, 2011 11:50 pm

Albert Poo-holes.

tugs · Post #1330 » by **tugs** » Mon Oct 3, 2011 12:16 am

Gek wrote:?... You're welcome though I suppose.

the one you posted in the fitness thread. :eyebrows:

Post #1331 » by **Slava** » Mon Oct 3, 2011 12:42 am

Would you even consider responding to this kind of job postings?

http://columbiamo.craigslist.org/sof/2585826136.html

Gek · Post #1332 » by **Gek** » Mon Oct 3, 2011 12:43 am

SlavaMedvedenko wrote:Would you even consider responding to this kind of job postings?

http://columbiamo.craigslist.org/sof/2585826136.html

Depends on how much you like circle jerks and video game developing. And Type II Diabetes in 20 years.

Post #1333 » by **Slava** » Mon Oct 3, 2011 12:49 am

That feels more like someone who would chain me in his basement for devious purposes.

Gek · Post #1334 » by **Gek** » Mon Oct 3, 2011 12:50 am

http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/enter ... nt/?p=6716

Also that new Justin Timberlake movie with time on your life is a cool movie concept.

tugs · Post #1335 » by **tugs** » Mon Oct 3, 2011 12:57 am

SlavaMedvedenko wrote:Would you even consider responding to this kind of job postings?

http://columbiamo.craigslist.org/sof/2585826136.html

are they even serious?

RiotSweetie · Post #1336 » by **RiotSweetie** » Mon Oct 3, 2011 2:21 am

SlavaMedvedenko wrote:Would you even consider responding to this kind of job postings?

http://columbiamo.craigslist.org/sof/2585826136.html

My friend actually applied to a position with a similar description. Turns out it was a job for Google. It could either be a really crappy job or a really beneficial one that doesn't want millions of applicants, just those who are serious about building software.

tugs · Post #1337 » by **tugs** » Mon Oct 3, 2011 2:30 am

RiotSweetie wrote:
SlavaMedvedenko wrote:Would you even consider responding to this kind of job postings?

http://columbiamo.craigslist.org/sof/2585826136.html

My friend actually applied to a position with a similar description. Turns out it was a job for Google. It could either be a really crappy job or a really beneficial one that doesn't want millions of applicants, just those who are serious about building software.

why use that kind of job description though. if they want the best/right employee why do that? how's your friend doing? she cute?

Post #1338 » by **TyCobb** » Mon Oct 3, 2011 2:34 am

RiotSweetie · Post #1339 » by **RiotSweetie** » Mon Oct 3, 2011 2:38 am

tugs wrote:
why use that kind of job description though. if they want the best/right employee why do that? how's your friend doing? she cute?

Some people are out for the incentives. Google....wow. A company like that knows how to keep their employees happy. You want people who are qualified for the job and are there for a long-term thing, not someone who will bail when he/she gets a better offer or if the company takes a blow. Or, like I said, it could be a really crappy job or even a prank. But I don't think someone would just outright say "HORRIBLE WORKING CONDITIONS AND WAGES". I mean really....unless it's a joke of some sort.

And my friend is doing well. He seems like your type. Firm chest, tall, tan. Get at it.

Post #1340 » by **TyCobb** » Mon Oct 3, 2011 2:40 am

The whole package.