DEEP3CL wrote:No I'm not, but I'm saying that it wasn't going to guarantee them a series win just because he might have played. He has struggled against the Griz a lot.MistyMountain20 wrote:So you're saying OKC is better without Westbrook. Good luck with that.
OKC is a flawed team, they won't win anything of note until they get a decent post presence. That's real talk.
Real talk ey?
Memphis does the job, and if anybody out there thinks it could've been different with Russell think again. All he would have done is made it even more easier for the Griz to beat them.
Well the Heat won a championship with a real post presence, so that sorta negates your point. Aside from that the Thunder have beaten the Grizzlies, the Spurs and the Lakers in the past, all teams with post players.