Award Winning Lakers Board NBA Dynasty League - K>J>G Wins! B2B!!

ROballer · Post #1601 » by **ROballer** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 3:06 pm

Yeah, tugsy, let's hear it...

I'm actually curious of what all of the guys think, since this year might be the closest 1 to 2 in recent history in the real draft....meaning we'll probably not know who goes first between the two until Adam Silver calls it.
All of the past years we probably knew, at least 90% that is.

Not that anything will change my mind, I remain to my guns...I'll go as far as the Lakers go.

Wavy Q · Post #1602 » by **Wavy Q** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 3:53 pm

My opinion is that, unless its a once in a generation cant miss talent (Ben Simmons, LeBron, predraft Wiggins hype.) If the two players are reasonably close, im drafting the one going to a better organization/situation.

If hypothetically, the Magic had the 1st pick, and the Lakers had the 2nd, and the Magic took Ball, and the Lakers took Fultz, i would take Fultz in fantasy. Because the Magic have proven to be incompetent at development.

So for example, in reality. If the Celtics get the 1st pick and draft Fultz, and the Lakers get the 2nd and draft Ball. Im drafting Ball in fantasy. Fultz would be riding the pine behind IT, Avery Bradley, and Marcus Smart, and im not gonna draft a player with the caveat being he needs a trade to become relevant.

ROballer · Post #1603 » by **ROballer** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 4:05 pm

That's what I'm saying also...Lakers and Philly are IMO the two best spots for those two.
Anywhere else they need something to be done before they will get what they're due.

Boston and Phoenix are absolutely **** scenarios for both of them, since they are so talented guard heavy.

tugs · Post #1604 » by **tugs** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 4:17 pm

I always go BPA + team fit. Basically all that Wavy mentioned, emphasizing on "better team" as ideal situation and not a talent heavy team.

Still undecided on who the better player is, though. Need to do more research.

As for the fuel part, as your brother, don't go dropping bombs then go:

ROballer wrote:I say a lot of **** things all the time, 3 yrs of this league should have made this clear.

Optms · Post #1605 » by **Optms** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:17 pm

Taking into account that we don't know where either is going as of yet, I'm leaning towards Fultz.

ak7 · Post #1606 » by **ak7** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:17 pm

ROballer wrote:Huh? Having your underwear tight up your ass again so you can't think straight?

Which of my remarks do I need to stupid in it to you again?

Or are you on team Ball and don't know how to post some facts, like Ty does?

Nobody except Wavy and KJG won **** around here, so the sense of entitlement needs to cease...they can give advice on winning, not you, not anybody else. If we're talking about winning, which we are not in this instance.

Except for maybe FG%, which I mentioned....and if you take your time and check the actual stats, you could see I speak the truth. 48% does win it for you way more often than not.

LOL.

I'm pretty sure that I've won triple the amount of games as you.

As for Ball/Fultz..Why are you even trying to justify who will be better when you've no clue how either player will adapt to the league or even what their situation will be.

If you're talking in a vacuum Ball is the better player and it's not really close. Ball has high round potential because of his ability to score, pass,rebound and average a steal or two which goes a long way.

I wouldn't expect you to consider these things because you're preaching FG% which is one of, if not the easiest, stat to crutch or punt with a single waiver wire add.

No wonder why you continuously draft at the top of the board, your team building skills smell of poo.

tugs · Post #1607 » by **tugs** » Wed Mar 22, 2017 12:34 am

One thing though. Ball will be welcomed very warmly by the league because of his father and learning curve for him will have to be and will be very steep.

ROballer · Post #1608 » by **ROballer** » Wed Mar 22, 2017 4:40 am

ak7 wrote:
ROballer wrote:Huh? Having your underwear tight up your ass again so you can't think straight?

Which of my remarks do I need to stupid in it to you again?

Or are you on team Ball and don't know how to post some facts, like Ty does?

Nobody except Wavy and KJG won **** around here, so the sense of entitlement needs to cease...they can give advice on winning, not you, not anybody else. If we're talking about winning, which we are not in this instance.

Except for maybe FG%, which I mentioned....and if you take your time and check the actual stats, you could see I speak the truth. 48% does win it for you way more often than not.

LOL.

I'm pretty sure that I've won triple the amount of games as you.

As for Ball/Fultz..Why are you even trying to justify who will be better when you've no clue how either player will adapt to the league or even what their situation will be.

If you're talking in a vacuum Ball is the better player and it's not really close. Ball has high round potential because of his ability to score, pass,rebound and average a steal or two which goes a long way.

I wouldn't expect you to consider these things because you're preaching FG% which is one of, if not the easiest, stat to crutch or punt with a single waiver wire add.

No wonder why you continuously draft at the top of the board, your team building skills smell of poo.

Yep, as usual, looking for attention and don't know what the **** are you talking about....I didn't even bring the FG% part, Ty did. Take your damn horse glasses off, and if you don't really have anything to say, then don't.

Ball has high round potential because of his ability to score, pass,rebound and average a steal or two which goes a long way.

Well thanks for the wonderful insight, nobody knew this already, you're making a breakthrough. Except that Fultz also falls in this category, I mean really falls in this category, since scoring applies to him and not Ball.

Wavy Q · Post #1609 » by **Wavy Q** » Wed Mar 22, 2017 8:28 am

Ball got that ugly af jumpshot, needs a fixin badly.

Mirjalovic · Post #1610 » by **Mirjalovic** » Wed Mar 22, 2017 9:22 am

Yes Ro, just take Fultz and done with it.

tugs · Post #1611 » by **tugs** » Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:30 pm

I don't know he seems to fall to that "special" group of players that has an unorthodox release but makes them ie. Steph Curry, Kevin Martin, and Shawn Marion to an extent.

Mirjalovic · Post #1612 » by **Mirjalovic** » Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:53 pm

tugs wrote:I don't know he seems to fall to that "special" group of players that has an unorthodox release but makes them ie. Steph Curry, Kevin Martin, and Shawn Marion to an extent.

shutup.

he's chuck hayes bad.

Mirjalovic · Post #1613 » by **Mirjalovic** » Sat Mar 25, 2017 5:58 am

bad game for Lonzo Ball. What a scrub.

ROballer · Post #1614 » by **ROballer** » Sat Mar 25, 2017 6:44 am

Well, he probably cost himself the no.1 overall pick, so there's that.

Anyways, if he does land for the Lakers at no.2, you'll have 4 hrs to make me a damn offer, otherwise his ass is mine and you will cry your eyes out into oblivion.

Mamba Mentality · Post #1615 » by **Mamba Mentality** » Sat Mar 25, 2017 7:25 pm

Making everyone on my roster available. Not interested in picks.

Kobe>Jordan>God · Post #1616 » by **Kobe>Jordan>God** » Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:24 am

Mirjalovic wrote:bad game for Lonzo Ball. What a scrub.

Don't be too hard on him - apparently his mother has been having strokes and there was an incident last night.

Read on Twitter

Post #1617 » by **TyCobb** » Sun Mar 26, 2017 1:20 am

Quicker he exits NCAA > quicker he gets paid > quicker he can help with health costs??

moonpie · Post #1618 » by **moonpie** » Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:39 pm

Shopping the 6th pick

ROballer · Post #1619 » by **ROballer** » Sun Mar 26, 2017 7:46 pm

Alex Len and Cameron Payne, who will most likely start in Chicago next year.

Deal?

Wavy Q · Post #1620 » by **Wavy Q** » Mon Mar 27, 2017 12:11 am

dude lol Cameron Payne is trash, he doesnt deserve to be a backup let alone start.