tugs wrote:You do it because?
I already answered it. Read my post again.
Moderators: Danny Darko, TyCobb, Kilroy
tugs wrote:You do it because?
jay51024 wrote:

Princeinrevolt wrote:Collins > Markkanen... If we could do the Clarkson for the Detroit Pick trade. Magic Johnson automatically becomes the best GM in the NBA.
TyCobb wrote:Princeinrevolt wrote:Collins > Markkanen... If we could do the Clarkson for the Detroit Pick trade. Magic Johnson automatically becomes the best GM in the NBA.
No, no, no. Markkanen > Collins.
Collins was very pedestrian against good college teams. He also played in under half of his team's minutes (43.1%). Against Tier A teams his ORtg dropped to 102.5 and his TO rate jumped to 26.2.
Against good teams...
St. Mary's (3 times) 10 points, 6 points, 4 points...
Florida 4 points
Iowa St. 9 points
Arizona 8 points
Tenn 10 points
BYU 6 points
West Virginia 1 point
North Carolina 9 points
Xavier 6 points
Outlier
South Carolina 14 points
Markkanen in the same sample size against Tier A (13 games)...
81.7 %min, 122.9 Ortg, 9.9 TO rate.
He is way better my friend.
TyCobb wrote:Princeinrevolt wrote:Collins > Markkanen... If we could do the Clarkson for the Detroit Pick trade. Magic Johnson automatically becomes the best GM in the NBA.
No, no, no. Markkanen > Collins.
Collins was very pedestrian against good college teams. He also played in under half of his team's minutes (43.1%). Against Tier A teams his ORtg dropped to 102.5 and his TO rate jumped to 26.2.
Against good teams...
St. Mary's (3 times) 10 points, 6 points, 4 points...
Florida 4 points
Iowa St. 9 points
Arizona 8 points
Tenn 10 points
BYU 6 points
West Virginia 1 point
North Carolina 9 points
Xavier 6 points
Outlier
South Carolina 14 points
Markkanen in the same sample size against Tier A (13 games)...
81.7 %min, 122.9 Ortg, 9.9 TO rate.
He is way better my friend.

Michael Lucky wrote:Collins didn't get any minutes. So hard to really know how good he is. Too bad the other Collins doesn't hit jump shot. That guy would have been a shoe in as a top 5 pick - 10 years ago.

jay51024 wrote:
The Lakers' suspicion that Ball might wind up being better than presumptive No. 1 overall pick Markelle Fultz—and perhaps the Boston Celtics' suspicion that Jackson or Duke forward Jayson Tatum also could be better than Fultz—will make the top of this draft one to be analyzed for years.
Many league executives view Fultz as the best option largely because he has the least bust potential, but that clearly wasn't a strong enough selling point to Celtics general manager Danny Ainge, whose decision to trade down to No. 3 will hand Fultz to the Philadelphia 76ers.
The Lakers got a firsthand look at Fultz in a workout Thursday, so the fact that they are leaning toward Ball (even if Fultz was available) as this week began is telling.


There is still a lot to like about both Russell and Randle as well, but there are also ongoing questions about how well they take criticism, according to team sources. Lakers head coach Luke Walton entered the season asking Russell to be less of a know-it-all and more of a leader for the group, while he hoped Randle would emulate Draymond Green in using every perceived slight as motivation. Though both players improved their games, neither advanced as far as Walton had hoped. Russell was inconsistent with his professionalism, and Randle often lost messages given to him if they were delivered harshly.



J_LA wrote:On Friday Fultz "murdered" his workout and Magic Johnson was trying to trade up for him. Now they would take Lonzo regardless.
I guess everyone can decide on their own who or what to believe.
TyCobb wrote:
The Celtics could have told the Lakers this:
"Look, we're not high on Fultz and we're leaning on taking Ball here with the #1. Meanwhile, Philly is really high on Fultz. If you go public with your admiration for Fultz and draw up the price for us, then we won't select Ball and we'll trade the pick to Philly so you guys can have Lonzo to yourselves."
+
#3 spot is such a pivotal spot in this draft. That is where we were hearing Philly and Kings trade talks. Boston's endgame is to stockpile assets for a 'consensus' #1 player who wasn't an ideal fit for them.
JohnVancouver wrote:JC isn't good enoughto be Lou Williams instant points guy off the bench and he's a ball stopper, exactly what we don't need inthis offense. The ball has to move, not to mention the already mentioned defensive problem.
he was a great 2nd round pick now on an attractive salary and very tradeable, just what we want right now. He doesn't fit and he has value to others.
TyCobb wrote:J_LA wrote:On Friday Fultz "murdered" his workout and Magic Johnson was trying to trade up for him. Now they would take Lonzo regardless.
I guess everyone can decide on their own who or what to believe.TyCobb wrote:
The Celtics could have told the Lakers this:
"Look, we're not high on Fultz and we're leaning on taking Ball here with the #1. Meanwhile, Philly is really high on Fultz. If you go public with your admiration for Fultz and draw up the price for us, then we won't select Ball and we'll trade the pick to Philly so you guys can have Lonzo to yourselves."
+
#3 spot is such a pivotal spot in this draft. That is where we were hearing Philly and Kings trade talks. Boston's endgame is to stockpile assets for a 'consensus' #1 player who wasn't an ideal fit for them.
It's not as far-fetched as Lucky may have led you to believe.
The NBA wants Lonzo in LA.