no he couldn't dunk it, then he dropped it because he got hit in the eye.Patterns wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Yea but Kwame dropped it.
Is Bynum or Bryant more valuable to the Lakers?
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
- snaquille oatmeal
- Retired Mod 
- Posts: 16,823
- And1: 4,829
- Joined: Nov 15, 2005
- Location: San Diego
- 
                      
Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
                        You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
Re: Is Bynum or Bryant more valuable to the Lakers?
- 
               sp6r=underrated
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,910
- And1: 13,742
- Joined: Jan 20, 2007
- 
                    
Re: Is Bynum or Bryant more valuable to the Lakers?
pooteeweet wrote:Watching Bynum squirm on the ground I came to a realization; I'd almost rather play a handful of games without Kobe than without Bynum, especially going into a stretch of the season where points in the paint and interior defense are going to be at a premium. I went back and forth mentally with myself over who had become more valuable to this team. Maybe I'm asking a different question than who is the MVP of the Lakers. I'm asking; who do the Lakers need more to win, Bynum or Bryant?
When Bynum has dominate games in the playoffs, make this thread. When Bynum carries a team for stretches, then makes this thread. When Bynum inspires debates about whether he's the best player in the game and were he ranks all time, then make this thread.
Not now, its Bryant.
- 
               DS1
- Starter
- Posts: 2,351
- And1: 64
- Joined: Apr 27, 2002
- Location: Lawrence, Kansas
My goodness do not only non Lakers fans but many Lakers fans take Kobe Bryant for granted. Like Clyde Drexler was once said "Kobe is the most underrated player in NBA history". If ones knows basketball, ones know how vital Kobe is to the Los Angeles Lakers. Andrew Bynum is a up and coming force but that would be happening without Kobe Bryant drawing endless amounts of attention away from him. 
 
            
                                    
                                    
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z
                        - 
               Gerald3Wallace
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,794
- And1: 99
- Joined: Apr 12, 2007
- Location: cali baby
- pooteeweet
- Freshman
- Posts: 93
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 27, 2007
Some pretty sensitive people here.  I didn't once diminish Kobe's importance to the Lakers.  It's pretty clear the Lakers aren't going anywhere without both Kobe and Bynum in the line-up.  Is it such an unreasonable query to wonder about Bynum possibly being more important to day-to-day winning?  There's truth to the adage that "a good big man is better than a good little man."  Kobe's the best perimeter defensive player the Lakers have, but his perimeter defense didn't prevent the Sonics from getting 56 points in the paint.  Kobe's a great shooter, but I'd rather have Bynum take a shot than Kobe.  Bynum hits 20% more of the shots he takes, will rebound a high percentage of his misses, and his misses don't generally lead to a fast break opportunity for the other team.   None of this is a knock on Kobe, they're different players with different skill-sets, playing at entirely different positions.   I don't care if you agree or disagree, just don't tell me I can't even ask the question.
            
                                    
                                    
                        - MikeyMike
- Starter
- Posts: 2,414
- And1: 2
- Joined: Aug 16, 2006
- Location: Los Angeles
snaquille oatmeal wrote:Kobe is the engine, Drew is the turbo charge.
without Kobe, Drew gets tripple teamed all night, we lose.
without Drew, Kobe gets tripple teamed, we have a chance to win.
You win, thanks for playing. Couldn't have said it better....sig worthy
 
Fisher, remembered, “We weren’t sitting around waiting for something to happen to become one of the best teams in the league. We set out to become that.”
- 
               what would jack bauer do?
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,742
- And1: 295
- Joined: Jul 10, 2006
- Location: Las Vegas
- Contact:
- 
                    
This is really extreme, but I think a decent analogy would be- the Lakers without Kobe would be like how the t-wolves are without an elite guard. Bynum in the future will probably put up the big dominant numbers like big Al, but there would be nobody to steer the ship. Obviously, our record wouldn't be as awful as theirs but, we'd still be a subplayoff team in the west. Or even this years Clippers with Kaman is a good example too.
On a side note, from what I've seen from Bynum in the last month I really think he's going to be the best center in the league in the next few years. It was amazing to see how he evolved from the beginning of the year to this month. He went from just getting mostly offensive rebounds and alley-oops to showing us he has a full repetoire of excellent footwork and postgame.
            
                                    
                                    
                        On a side note, from what I've seen from Bynum in the last month I really think he's going to be the best center in the league in the next few years. It was amazing to see how he evolved from the beginning of the year to this month. He went from just getting mostly offensive rebounds and alley-oops to showing us he has a full repetoire of excellent footwork and postgame.
- 
               B-Scott
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,180
- And1: 94
- Joined: Dec 22, 2005
- Location: Los Angeles California
Bynum is the reason this team went from mediocre to potentially a dominant team capable of winning close to 60 games. Without him,now we are struggling with teams like Memphis and Seattle.
I think Bynum impacts the game more on the defensive end and on the offensive end he provides more high percentage offense.
            
                                    
                                    
                        I think Bynum impacts the game more on the defensive end and on the offensive end he provides more high percentage offense.
- 
               Gerald3Wallace
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,794
- And1: 99
- Joined: Apr 12, 2007
- Location: cali baby
B-Scott wrote:Bynum is the reason this team went from mediocre to potentially a dominant team capable of winning close to 60 games. Without him,now we are struggling with teams like Memphis and Seattle.
I think Bynum impacts the game more on the defensive end and on the offensive end he provides more high percentage offense.
that is true...but u also forgot the fact that the bynum wouldnt be this dominant if it wasant for kobe...and the lakers would not be where they are without kobe also...
fisher
ariza
walton
odom
bynum
do u really think that team can lead us anywhere?
- milesfides
- Retired Mod 
- Posts: 16,012
- And1: 1,449
- Joined: Nov 09, 2004
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
Gerald3Wallace wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
that is true...but u also forgot the fact that the bynum wouldnt be this dominant if it wasant for kobe...and the lakers would not be where they are without kobe also...
fisher
ariza
walton
odom
bynum
do u really think that team can lead us anywhere?
Yes, that would lead us to OJ Mayo.
“OH! Caruso parachutes in! You cannot stop him - you can only hope to contain him!” -Kevin Harlan, LAL-GSW 4/4/19
                        















 hahahha that was funny lol
hahahha that was funny lol