Community Thread: Adventure Time!

RiotSweetie · Post #301 » by **RiotSweetie** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:32 pm

Why would those count?

Gek · Post #302 » by **Gek** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:36 pm

They count if you had no panties on underneath b/c they're shorts for girls. If you wore them as underwear under something else then no, but if you only wore them, then yes. If you've only worn them to sleep then we'll need a ruling from the judges.

RiotSweetie · Post #303 » by **RiotSweetie** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:41 pm

-____-

Who are the judges?

Edit: wait, if boxers don't count for you guys, why should they count for us? And boyshorts are worn like underwear. They're not actual shorts.

miggs · Post #304 » by **miggs** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:46 pm

Gek wrote:They count if you had no panties on underneath b/c they're shorts for girls. If you wore them as underwear under something else then no, but if you only wore them, then yes. If you've only worn them to sleep then we'll need a ruling from the judges.

Can't count if she's going to sleep because the whole point of going commando is actually being out and about without any underwear, not being being asleep. If that is the case, we've all gone to bed commando style at least once :lol:

Sofa King · Post #305 » by **Sofa King** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:47 pm

Normally, I don't wear boxers in public. I may wear it around the house but thats when I'm about to go to sleep.

But if girls wear some sort of shorts in public and don't have any underwear, yeah thats commando in my book.

RiotSweetie · Post #306 » by **RiotSweetie** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:50 pm

No one wears underwear with boyshorts coz they're not actual shorts.
-.-

miggs · Post #307 » by **miggs** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:51 pm

RiotSweetie wrote:No one wears underwear with boyshorts coz they're not actual shorts.
-.-

I don't know what I would think if some girl took off her boyshorts only to reveal some other kind of panties under :noway:

Maybe there's a chastity belt under them, some new paper thin, silky smooth variant

RiotSweetie · Post #308 » by **RiotSweetie** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:52 pm

^exactly!

Boyshorts are like underwear. They ARE underwear.

miggs · Post #309 » by **miggs** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:53 pm

RiotSweetie wrote:^exactly!

Boyshorts are like underwear. They ARE underwear.

I wanna live in a world where the girls think boyshorts ARE shorts 8-)

Sofa King · Post #310 » by **Sofa King** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:53 pm

RiotSweetie wrote:No one wears underwear with boyshorts coz they're not actual shorts.
-.-

I'm having trouble visualizing. Can you show me?

miggs · Post #311 » by **miggs** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:55 pm

Sofa King wrote:
RiotSweetie wrote:No one wears underwear with boyshorts coz they're not actual shorts.
-.-

I'm having trouble visualizing. Can you show me?

Yea then I can finally use this:

I find it hilarious :lol:

Sofa King · Post #312 » by **Sofa King** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:01 pm

I need some eye bleach now. Visualizing something I didn't want.

RiotSweetie · Post #313 » by **RiotSweetie** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:02 pm

I don't get it.

miggs · Post #314 » by **miggs** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:04 pm

RiotSweetie wrote:I don't get it.

I think SK is visualizing me as a naked oompa loompa :rofl2:

with a great tan I might add.

RiotSweetie · Post #315 » by **RiotSweetie** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:06 pm

you're a naked oompa loompa?
O_o

miggs · Post #316 » by **miggs** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:08 pm

RiotSweetie wrote:you're a naked oompa loompa?
O_o

You're asking the wrong question, the right question is how did I escape Wonka's factory???

Imadogg · Post #317 » by **Imadogg** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:08 pm

hermes wrote:
Jetset wrote:so because i didn't think that particular one is good, i can't take a joke every now and then in stride? get over yourself bro, it sucked and pretty bad. move along.

no, you've never been able to take a joke

you always fire back and have to have the last word

i thought everyone knew

hermes wrote:
tugs wrote:I imagine Riot to be like this when eating brownies

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdoLNHJjLTc[/youtube]

makes sense, she does like the boston sports

hermes wrote:
Jetset wrote:wasn't that chick in the hangover pt. i?

don't even act like you don't know who heather graham is for feets sake

hermes wrote:
Imadogg wrote:Shoulda mentioned hermes, I miss him

Sofa King · Post #318 » by **Sofa King** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:12 pm

miggs wrote:
RiotSweetie wrote:you're a naked oompa loompa?
O_o

You're asking the wrong question, the right question is how did I escape Wonka's factory???

RiotSweetie · Post #319 » by **RiotSweetie** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:12 pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cR2WeCSAiKA[/youtube]

One of the sexiest dance routines I've ever seen. Oh, Canadians always win.

miggs · Post #320 » by **miggs** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:13 pm

Sofa King wrote:
miggs wrote:
RiotSweetie wrote:you're a naked oompa loompa?
O_o

You're asking the wrong question, the right question is how did I escape Wonka's factory???