2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion

Spens1 · Post #421 » by **Spens1** » Wed May 24, 2017 4:41 am

Mrewn wrote:

Read on Twitter

Smart move, he's incredibly young and if he develops this coming year and has a decent season (not even good or great) with near starting minutes or starting minutes, i think with his athletic gifts, you're talking about him as a top 5 pick. Its a shame because i would have been happy if we took with him with our 28th pick and tried to develop him for now.

Frank Dux · Post #422 » by **Frank Dux** » Wed May 24, 2017 6:07 am

I was hoping to get Diallo with the Houston pick.

MrWaffles · Post #423 » by **MrWaffles** » Wed May 24, 2017 11:53 am

ScHoolBoy B wrote:If we can steal Harry Giles I'm all for it. That would be a sweet pick at 28th.

I'd also be happy with Bam at the 28th as well.

Giles is a major risk, if he's around 35-45, let's buy a second rounder and use it on him. At least we know what we're getting with Bam, although Bam is pretty much a younger Black.

Jon Snow · Post #424 » by **Jon Snow** » Wed May 24, 2017 1:31 pm

Just heard that the Lakers Outsiders podcast host said that his sources within the organization are saying Lonzo is all but a formality and the org apparently loves him. Is he legit?

Princeinrevolt · Post #425 » by **Princeinrevolt** » Wed May 24, 2017 1:55 pm

Jon Snow wrote:Just heard that the Lakers Outsiders podcast host said that his sources within the organization are saying Lonzo is all but a formality and the org apparently loves him. Is he legit?

You know nothing, Jon Snow.

But seriously though, don't believe everything the media says. But it sure does seem like we are going to pick Lonzo.

Jon Snow · Post #426 » by **Jon Snow** » Wed May 24, 2017 2:29 pm

Princeinrevolt wrote:
Jon Snow wrote:Just heard that the Lakers Outsiders podcast host said that his sources within the organization are saying Lonzo is all but a formality and the org apparently loves him. Is he legit?

You know nothing, Jon Snow.

I get that a lot. :lol:

But seriously though, don't believe everything the media says. But it sure does seem like we are going to pick Lonzo.

Yeah, sounds iffy. Can't wait for Draft Day!

dontforget · Post #427 » by **dontforget** » Wed May 24, 2017 2:53 pm

Jon Snow wrote:Just heard that the Lakers Outsiders podcast host said that his sources within the organization are saying Lonzo is all but a formality and the org apparently loves him. Is he legit?

No one here knows for sure, but for this team, Ball is pretty much the perfect prospect for this Lakers team. Right now, the Lakers young core have only adapted Luke's vision of pushing pace. Unfortunately, they severely lack in creating shots for others and moving the ball. It's pretty much each player will 1st try to do something for themselves, and then pass it off because they don't have anything.

Lonzo Ball, while ceiling may be a bit lower than Fultz, plays the type the game that fits Luke's system and this young core perfectly. He pushes the ball but as opposed to the Lakers core, his main goal is to setup someone. If that translates to the NBA it would be the key into uncapping the potential of the likes of Ingram, Russell, and Randle. The biggest question I have with Ball is will his production translate to the NBA? He's an average athlete and in my opinion there will be issues with him on defensively, especially teamed up with Russell. But he's an elite passer and while ugly, an above average shooter. He also definitely needs to build on his body, although not as extreme as it was for Ingram.

All in all, Lavar be damned, I'm sold on Lonzo and the Lakers can't pass on him.

meetbishop · Post #428 » by **meetbishop** » Wed May 24, 2017 2:59 pm

Princeinrevolt wrote:
Jon Snow wrote:Just heard that the Lakers Outsiders podcast host said that his sources within the organization are saying Lonzo is all but a formality and the org apparently loves him. Is he legit?

You know nothing, Jon Snow.

But seriously though, don't believe everything the media says. But it sure does seem like we are going to pick Lonzo.

If we don't know about Rob and Magic we know that Luke Loves him!! He said it himself so we can use that as a starter.

deargodno · Post #429 » by **deargodno** » Wed May 24, 2017 3:25 pm

meetbishop wrote:
If we don't know about Rob and Magic we know that Luke Loves him!! He said it himself so we can use that as a starter.

TBH I thought Luke's comments were very diplomatic and phrased carefully, the posts by LakersNation to me sound like they're making pretty great leaps at what he really means.

Pointgod · Post #430 » by **Pointgod** » Wed May 24, 2017 4:39 pm

Princeinrevolt wrote:
Jon Snow wrote:Just heard that the Lakers Outsiders podcast host said that his sources within the organization are saying Lonzo is all but a formality and the org apparently loves him. Is he legit?

You know nothing, Jon Snow.

But seriously though, don't believe everything the media says. But it sure does seem like we are going to pick Lonzo.

We are going to pick Lonzo because of the narrative and hype despite the fact all the holes in his game and Lavar's baggage. Most front offices are predictable and uncreative so Ball will be the pick. All the other players have holes as well so if they keep the number 2 they'll play if safe.

Michael Lucky · Post #431 » by **Michael Lucky** » Wed May 24, 2017 9:38 pm

hmm Ramona saying it's only 50/50 that the Lakers are taking Ball. A lot of intrigue with Jackson, Fox, Fulz, and Tatum.

Post #432 » by **TyCobb** » Wed May 24, 2017 10:07 pm

My only worry is Ball going #1.

Michael Lucky · Post #433 » by **Michael Lucky** » Wed May 24, 2017 10:09 pm

I hope your worry is genuine.

jerkslo · Post #434 » by **jerkslo** » Thu May 25, 2017 12:31 am

I'm still on the page that Fox, with his defense and speed, is the pick. And I think you try to trade down 1-2 spots, dumping Deng in the process for someone who wants Ball.

J_LA · Post #435 » by **J_LA** » Thu May 25, 2017 1:04 am

Michael Lucky wrote:hmm Ramona saying it's only 50/50 that the Lakers are taking Ball. A lot of intrigue with Jackson, Fox, Fulz, and Tatum.

I heard that. I also heard Geeter say the same thing.

moonpie · Post #436 » by **moonpie** » Thu May 25, 2017 1:33 am

Draft prospect of the day: Harry Giles (F/C, Duke)
www.draftexpress.com/profile/Harry-Giles-7236/

Watch on YouTube

iamworthy · Post #437 » by **iamworthy** » Thu May 25, 2017 2:24 am

moonpie wrote:Draft prospect of the day: Harry Giles (F/C, Duke)
www.draftexpress.com/profile/Harry-Giles-7236/

Watch on YouTube

Watch on YouTube

I would take him at 28 but he'll be gone by then.

The Skyhook · Post #438 » by **The Skyhook** » Thu May 25, 2017 2:31 am

iamworthy wrote:
moonpie wrote:Draft prospect of the day: Harry Giles (F/C, Duke)
www.draftexpress.com/profile/Harry-Giles-7236/

Watch on YouTube

Watch on YouTube

I would take him at 28 but he'll be gone by then.

That's my concern as well Big Game. I get the feeling all these guys we're falling in love with like Giles, Bam, and Bell will be off the board when it's our turn to pick. We're not the only fan base that would love to have these guys and I'm sure a lot of front offices feel the same way. If these talented guys actually do fall to 28 it could very well be for good reason.

Teen Girl Squad · Post #439 » by **Teen Girl Squad** » Thu May 25, 2017 5:42 am

Michael Lucky wrote:I hope your worry is genuine.

Me too, I'm no pro scout but I have Ball 5th behind the other 4 (Fultz, Jackson, Tatum, Fox) so if they take Ball, then I'll be happy with whoever we get.

Spens1 · Post #440 » by **Spens1** » Thu May 25, 2017 6:46 am

If Ball went 1st then we take Fultz.

Also if we're higher on Fox etc (seriously why would you be) then i think it would be worthwhile trading down to 4 or 5 and seeing what kind of deal we can do with Phoenix/Sacramento.

Who do the Lakers draft on June 22nd with the 2nd overall pick?