ImageImageImageImageImage

Lakers get Steve Nash

Moderators: Danny Darko, TyCobb, Kilroy

User avatar
Kalidogg24
Head Coach
Posts: 6,026
And1: 827
Joined: Jan 02, 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
 

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#441 » by Kalidogg24 » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:24 am

Sedale Threatt wrote:
Kalidogg24 wrote:WERE ON THE SAME DAMN TEAM FELLAS!!


No, we pull for the same team. Huge difference.
Some of my best RealGM fights have been with Laker fans.



We got Nash and possibly the next big thing could be coming no later than next week.

I know some Laker fans are not cool with Dwight coming here due to his whiny diva attitude about the city of L.A.
An I know some Laker fans just want to get it done for the better of the future despite the pride factor.


Either way you dice it up , nobody is wrong on this matter.
It's out of our control no matter what.


P.S
Who Gives a Flying F#%@ what someone else says about your comment or comments.
It's a Damn NBA forum not a Presidential Debate.
REST IN PARADISE GOAT
Image
#TeamFlightBrothers
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#442 » by DEEP3CL » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:25 am

destro wrote:
DEEP3CL wrote:
tysonironmike wrote:Is destro the same guy who was crying because his game thread sucked? Maybe not.

Anyway no need for bickering, Take it easy DEEP.
Yeah it is since we're calling out guys. Dude came at me first chance he got just because the Lakers got someone not even a damn blind man could see coming.

Funny thing is I never even quoted the dude in like weeks since the season ended. F**k it though I'm good.


You're good yet you follow up this post with that kind of reply. You're upset that I'm giving you a hard time over what you said, and frankly I didn't expect it to go this far. Only a little ribbing. But I don't have to work tomorrow and I planned on staying up and play some games anyway, I really don't have a problem continuing this little skirmish.
You may say it was a little ribbing, and hey I can take that. But what pissed me off was you saying I took a shot at somebody in admitting I was wrong.

Again who did I take a shot at ?

And if ribbing is all you was doing then maybe I misinterpreted your post, I'll be the bigger man and say it's all good. Don't wanna ruin the mood and the fun the fellas are having on this pick up.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
User avatar
Kalidogg24
Head Coach
Posts: 6,026
And1: 827
Joined: Jan 02, 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
 

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#443 » by Kalidogg24 » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:26 am

Why don't you guys start attacking me instead of each other and I'll show you how a real Laker Triple OG handles these situation. LMAO
REST IN PARADISE GOAT
Image
#TeamFlightBrothers
User avatar
tugs
RealGM
Posts: 16,909
And1: 3,001
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#444 » by tugs » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:27 am

in other news :reporter:

anticipating a new Steve Nash shoe by Nike. here comes them endorsements!

Image
User avatar
Kalidogg24
Head Coach
Posts: 6,026
And1: 827
Joined: Jan 02, 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
 

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#445 » by Kalidogg24 » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:27 am

destro wrote:You can't even have an argument on this board anymore without everyone and their grandparents feeling like they need to be mediators and state the same exact played out phrases "we're on the same team, why can't we get along" type ****.


Cool Bro, Why don't you blow another Gasket in your head again over some words on the internet. LMAO

COME AT ME LOL!!!!
REST IN PARADISE GOAT
Image
#TeamFlightBrothers
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#446 » by Jetset » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:27 am

Kalidogg24 wrote:
Sedale Threatt wrote:
Kalidogg24 wrote:WERE ON THE SAME DAMN TEAM FELLAS!!


No, we pull for the same team. Huge difference.
Some of my best RealGM fights have been with Laker fans.



We got Nash and possibly the next big thing could be coming no later than next week.

I know some Laker fans are not cool with Dwight coming here due to his whiny diva attitude about the city of L.A.
An I know some Laker fans just want to get it done for the better of the future despite the pride factor.


Either way you dice it up , nobody is wrong on this matter.
It's out of our control no matter what.


I have no idea what you're talking about, yet I feel like I'm supposed to.
User avatar
Kalidogg24
Head Coach
Posts: 6,026
And1: 827
Joined: Jan 02, 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
 

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#447 » by Kalidogg24 » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:30 am

destro wrote:
I have no idea what you're talking about, yet I feel like I'm supposed to.



Image
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#448 » by Jetset » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:32 am

DEEP3CL wrote:You may say it was a little ribbing, and hey I can take that. But what pissed me off was you saying I took a shot at somebody in admitting I was wrong.

Again who did I take a shot at ?

And if ribbing is all you was doing then maybe I misinterpreted your post, I'll be the bigger man and say it's all good. Don't wanna ruin the mood and the fun the fellas are having on this pick up.


I'm just having fun at you saying Steve Nash is broken down, which absolutely couldn't be farther from the truth. You've obviously taken exception with all that you've typed in a matter of 30 minutes. You said "some guys are going to act petty and call me out over it but whatever", which is definitely towards me as I was the only one who brought up your username in this thread. And you can't say you didn't intend for that to happen, it's pretty blatant. And I didn't even care about your name calling, it was you getting uptight and feeling the need to respond as to did about a little ribbing as to why we're here right now.
User avatar
Anklebreaker702
RealGM
Posts: 13,946
And1: 164
Joined: Mar 29, 2008
Location: Las Vegas (2nd Home of the Lakers)
   

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#449 » by Anklebreaker702 » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:33 am

Kalidogg24 wrote:Why don't you guys start attacking me instead of each other and I'll show you how a real Laker Triple OG handles these situation. LMAO

Image
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
VETERAN LAKER FAN
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#450 » by DEEP3CL » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:33 am

Kalidogg24 wrote:Why don't you guys start attacking me instead of each other and I'll show you how a real Laker Triple OG handles these situation. LMAO
Naw Kali no need for that. Like I said I'm good. It's no use to reading into it anymore than it being just a little mishap. Truthfully I like destro/aka Jetset......he's a guy that won't back down not even from me. Bottom line it was a little flare up that maybe I strung too far. I didn't pick up on him ribbing me as he said. Like I said I barely even posted in this thread until now.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
User avatar
Wavy Q
RealGM
Posts: 24,317
And1: 2,390
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Location: Pull Up
     

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#451 » by Wavy Q » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:35 am

Sedale Threatt wrote:
Kalidogg24 wrote:WERE ON THE SAME DAMN TEAM FELLAS!!


No, we pull for the same team. Huge difference. Some of my best RealGM fights have been with Laker fans.


How do you know? Maybe I'm Steve Blake and BlunnTashiz is Darrius Morris
Michael Lucky
RealGM
Posts: 15,160
And1: 6,803
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#452 » by Michael Lucky » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:37 am

wow people complaining about this deal. Lakers just got the best PG they could get in FA and people are complaining. -_- Who cares if he's 38, lakers are doing this for the short term not long term. We want the Lakers to compete next year foremost, just be happy Jim Buss decided to go big instead of cheap.
User avatar
RaisingArizona
RealGM
Posts: 15,788
And1: 7,669
Joined: Apr 23, 2009
 

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#453 » by RaisingArizona » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:38 am

Good deal for both sides. Now you can compete for a ring while we can properly rebuild.
Image
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#454 » by Jetset » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:38 am

Kalidogg24 wrote:
destro wrote:You can't even have an argument on this board anymore without everyone and their grandparents feeling like they need to be mediators and state the same exact played out phrases "we're on the same team, why can't we get along" type ****.


Cool Bro, Why don't you blow another Gasket in your head again over some words on the internet. LMAO

COME AT ME LOL!!!!


Failed troll attempt.

But what I typed was the truth. There can't even be conflict without other parties feeling like they're obligated to step in. As long as it doesn't cross any lines it should just be left to the two parties that are involved in the discussion. I couldn't even reply to Deep without Stephano, yourself, and others feeling morally obligated to say something. So instead of leaving it to the two, you now have people putting their opinions in it which will inevitably evolve into a clusterf*ck where multiple opinions are being spewed out. Snowball effect.

Sit back and eat some popcorn or something, that's when I do whenever I'm not involved with something. Sometimes I do it when I am. Hull-less popcorn is pretty good. That is all.
User avatar
Kalidogg24
Head Coach
Posts: 6,026
And1: 827
Joined: Jan 02, 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
 

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#455 » by Kalidogg24 » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:39 am

ginobiliflops wrote:Good deal for both sides. Now you can compete for a ring while we can properly rebuild.


With Eric Gordon, Dragic and M. Beasley, sounds like a pretty good start to me.
Michael Lucky
RealGM
Posts: 15,160
And1: 6,803
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#456 » by Michael Lucky » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:40 am

NO will match EG's contract, they don't want to come away with nothing from the CP3 deal.
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#457 » by DEEP3CL » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:42 am

destro wrote:
DEEP3CL wrote:You may say it was a little ribbing, and hey I can take that. But what pissed me off was you saying I took a shot at somebody in admitting I was wrong.

Again who did I take a shot at ?

And if ribbing is all you was doing then maybe I misinterpreted your post, I'll be the bigger man and say it's all good. Don't wanna ruin the mood and the fun the fellas are having on this pick up.


I'm just having fun at you saying Steve Nash is broken down, which absolutely couldn't be farther from the truth. You've obviously taken exception with all that you've typed in a matter of 30 minutes. You said "some guys are going to act petty and call me out over it but whatever", which is definitely towards me as I was the only one who brought up your username in this thread. And you can't say you didn't intend for that to happen, it's pretty blatant. And I didn't even care about your name calling, it was you getting uptight and feeling the need to respond as to did about a little ribbing as to why we're here right now.
Honestly destro, the last time I posted in the thread was earlier in the day way way before this even happened. Me saying he's broken down was taken out of context anyway. The man has a bad back, that's where I was taking that whole point to.

As to saying some will be petty and come at me......well bruh I gotta say it wasn't meant for just you bro. I made comments that I knew every young buck would jump on. And I stand by the fact I didn't even directly quote you in this thread prior to now. I couldn't even tell you what page you quoted me on ribbing me about Steve and the broke down stuff. Before I left my crib to hang out this thread was only on like page 13 or 14....something like that.

So coming back here I only got part of the story. The post I made about being wrong came while I was out and found out about the deal through hear say.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
User avatar
Kalidogg24
Head Coach
Posts: 6,026
And1: 827
Joined: Jan 02, 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
 

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#458 » by Kalidogg24 » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:48 am

destro wrote:
Failed troll attempt.

But what I typed was the truth. There can't even be conflict without other parties feeling like they're obligated to step in. As long as it doesn't cross any lines it should just be left to the two parties that are involved in the discussion. I couldn't even reply to Deep without Stephano, yourself, and others feeling morally obligated to say something. So instead of leaving it to the two, you now have people putting their opinions in it which will inevitably evolve into a clusterf*ck where multiple opinions are being spewed out. Snowball effect.

Sit back and eat some popcorn or something, that's when I do whenever I'm not involved with something. Sometimes I do it when I am. Hull-less popcorn is pretty good. That is all.


Nah Im good. I got chicken wangs. Oh some damn good wings I must add.
Buffalo Hot, Parmesan Garlic, Lemon Pepper, and Honey BBQ. Beast!

Not trying to troll on you guys too hard. But seriously if you wanna keep it going be my guest,
I just felt like voicing my opinion and I already stated that I see you guys as huge assets to our Laker RGM community.
By me trying a failed attempt to mend the peace it was done because I wish you guys wouldn't be in such a negative mood during this huge signing of future hall of famer Steve Nash.
I get it NOW that if yall wanna debate, I need to "Let it Be" like the Beatles.



No need for you to analyze my every word.
It's not that serious Bro.


We got F'Ing Steve Nash!!!!! Nothing anyone says negative about me right now will bring me down
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#459 » by Jetset » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:49 am

DEEP3CL wrote:
destro wrote:
DEEP3CL wrote:You may say it was a little ribbing, and hey I can take that. But what pissed me off was you saying I took a shot at somebody in admitting I was wrong.

Again who did I take a shot at ?

And if ribbing is all you was doing then maybe I misinterpreted your post, I'll be the bigger man and say it's all good. Don't wanna ruin the mood and the fun the fellas are having on this pick up.


I'm just having fun at you saying Steve Nash is broken down, which absolutely couldn't be farther from the truth. You've obviously taken exception with all that you've typed in a matter of 30 minutes. You said "some guys are going to act petty and call me out over it but whatever", which is definitely towards me as I was the only one who brought up your username in this thread. And you can't say you didn't intend for that to happen, it's pretty blatant. And I didn't even care about your name calling, it was you getting uptight and feeling the need to respond as to did about a little ribbing as to why we're here right now.
Honestly destro, the last time I posted in the thread was earlier in the day way way before this even happened. Me saying he's broken down was taken out of context anyway. The man has a bad back, that's where I was taking that whole point to.

As to saying some will be petty and come at me......well bruh I gotta say it wasn't meant for just you bro. I made comments that I knew every young buck would jump on. And I stand by the fact I didn't even directly quote you in this thread prior to now. I couldn't even tell you what page you quoted me on ribbing me about Steve and the broke down stuff. Before I left my crib to hang out this thread was only on like page 13 or 14....something like that.

So coming back here I only got part of the story. The post I made about being wrong came while I was out and found out about the deal through hear say.


I know it wasn't or else you would've addressed me by named, but it definitely had to do with me so I'm going to talk for myself. I'm not quite sure what you're getting at with you not quoting me, I haven't posted anything in this thread before today except a tweet from Marc Stein saying that Phoenix wouldn't S&T Nash here, and that was yesterday. I also haven't said anything along the lines of Nash is washed up or anything like that, so again I don't understand what you're getting at.

But I'm glad it's understood that it's all been a misunderstanding.
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Lakers get Nash (updated page 13) 

Post#460 » by Jetset » Thu Jul 5, 2012 6:52 am

Kalidogg24 wrote:
destro wrote:
Failed troll attempt.

But what I typed was the truth. There can't even be conflict without other parties feeling like they're obligated to step in. As long as it doesn't cross any lines it should just be left to the two parties that are involved in the discussion. I couldn't even reply to Deep without Stephano, yourself, and others feeling morally obligated to say something. So instead of leaving it to the two, you now have people putting their opinions in it which will inevitably evolve into a clusterf*ck where multiple opinions are being spewed out. Snowball effect.

Sit back and eat some popcorn or something, that's when I do whenever I'm not involved with something. Sometimes I do it when I am. Hull-less popcorn is pretty good. That is all.


Nah Im good. I got chicken wangs. Oh some damn good wings I must add.
Buffalo Hot, Parmesan Garlic, Lemon Pepper, and Honey BBQ. Beast!

Not trying to troll on you guys too hard. But seriously if you wanna keep it going be my guest,
I just felt like voicing my opinion and I already stated that I see you guys as huge assets to our Laker RGM community.
By me trying a failed attempt to mend the peace it was done because I wish you guys wouldn't be in such a negative mood during this huge signing of future hall of famer Steve Nash.
I get it NOW that if yall wanna debate, I need to "Let it Be" like the Beatles.



No need for you to analyze my every word.
It's not that serious Bro.


We got F'Ing Steve Nash!!!!! Nothing anyone says negative about me right now will bring me down


Well I'm apparently a downer and negative person, so of course I'm going to bring the mood down. It wouldn't be the Lakers board if I didn't happen to piss in someone's reese puffs.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers