ImageImageImageImageImage

Future PointGuard

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

User avatar
stunnar0b
Starter
Posts: 2,476
And1: 121
Joined: Feb 10, 2010
Location: JUST OG

Future PointGuard 

Post#1 » by stunnar0b » Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:37 am

Personally i think Hinrich would be the number 1 candidate obviously, but it safe to say that we aint getting him.
With that being said steve blake has earn my vote and has shown to play tenacious defense when motivated, with kobe and ron he wont have any choice. he could hit the occasional three and how he played with the clipps theres no doubt he'll hit everybody in their sweet spots on a consistent bases...
User avatar
It_Was_Typed
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,802
And1: 12
Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Location: Lakewood, CA

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#2 » by It_Was_Typed » Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:09 am

Image
#JuiceIsFree
User avatar
southnc
Rookie
Posts: 1,190
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 15, 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#3 » by southnc » Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:19 am

stunnar0b wrote:Personally i think Hinrich would be the number 1 candidate obviously, but it safe to say that we aint getting him.
With that being said steve blake has earn my vote and has shown to play tenacious defense when motivated, with kobe and ron he wont have any choice. he could hit the occasional three and how he played with the clipps theres no doubt he'll hit everybody in their sweet spots on a consistent bases...

I agree that Blake would be a great fit. He is a selfless player with a high BB IQ and can play, PG, SG, or even the off-guard specialist role. He is a very good partner to a ball-dominate type SG, like Kobe; he has successfully partnered with Roy and even AI, who all command the ball. He went to the playoffs with both those teammates.

Blake shot nearly 43% 3ptrs with the Clips, so you'll get more than an "occasional" 3. He is also a very good passer with one of the most consistently high assist-to ratios; so, he takes good care of the ball. He rarely goes to the basket, though - he generally prefers to roam the perimeter.

He's a tenacious defender and good help defender, but has a tough time with small, fast guards like Brooks or Robinson. He's also not quite quick enough to stay with someone like Parker or Rondo. But, not many other PGs can guard these guys either without some help defense from teammates.
CowsMoo
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,458
And1: 0
Joined: May 11, 2009
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#4 » by CowsMoo » Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:07 am

d.will
shannWOW
Freshman
Posts: 52
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 31, 2010

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#5 » by shannWOW » Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:38 am

NATE ROBINSON
what would jack bauer do?
Veteran
Posts: 2,742
And1: 295
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Contact:
 

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#6 » by what would jack bauer do? » Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:41 am

shannWOW wrote:NATE ROBINSON


Yes please
Asianiac_24
General Manager
Posts: 8,504
And1: 3,999
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Contact:
   

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#7 » by Asianiac_24 » Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:53 am

Nate is the LAST thing we need. Maybe as a sixth man, firepower off the bench? Sure. Starting PG? God no.
aussie_laker
Sophomore
Posts: 208
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 09, 2006

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#8 » by aussie_laker » Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:04 am

Asianiac_24 wrote:Nate is the LAST thing we need. Maybe as a sixth man, firepower off the bench? Sure. Starting PG? God no.



firepower off the bench....mmmmmmaybe..... anywhere near our starting PG and GOD NO!
User avatar
Dalakerbox
Junior
Posts: 362
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 30, 2008
Contact:

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#9 » by Dalakerbox » Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:42 pm

1)Randy Foy
2)Sergio Rodriguez
3)Nate Rob-just for a scoring punch in crunch time if needed
4)I actually like J-Farmar and think he would contribute more with more minutes
5) Steve Blake
“If this is his team, that means no more coming into camp fat/out of shape, no more blaming others for our team’s failure, my team doesn’t mean only when we win it means carrying the burden of defeat just as gracefully as you carry a championship trophy.”
laduane1
Banned User
Posts: 2,216
And1: 29
Joined: Jul 04, 2008

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#10 » by laduane1 » Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:13 pm

Bulls guard, way to expensive. Blake. Who knows. Nate. He would be OK, at lease he is young. I do not see celts letting him go.
User avatar
Jase
RealGM
Posts: 13,051
And1: 158
Joined: Aug 01, 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI.

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#11 » by Jase » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:08 pm

As much as I like Blake, he's a bit old. I only mention this because if we pick him up, and even if he starts, we'll be having this conversation again in 2-3 years. I'd like to see us get a young point guard. My preference is Collison, but that isn't likely.

Still, never say never....
"A winner listens. A loser just waits until it's their turn to talk."
User avatar
stunnar0b
Starter
Posts: 2,476
And1: 121
Joined: Feb 10, 2010
Location: JUST OG

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#12 » by stunnar0b » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:50 pm

Shaun Livingston

Javaris Crittenton

Steve Blake
User avatar
stunnar0b
Starter
Posts: 2,476
And1: 121
Joined: Feb 10, 2010
Location: JUST OG

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#13 » by stunnar0b » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:50 pm

and Felton
User avatar
southnc
Rookie
Posts: 1,190
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 15, 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#14 » by southnc » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:40 pm

Dalakerbox wrote:1)Randy Foy
2)Sergio Rodriguez
3)Nate Rob-just for a scoring punch in crunch time if needed
4)I actually like J-Farmar and think he would contribute more with more minutes
5) Steve Blake


Sergio was never very effective in the NBA and is a very poor defender.

I believe he has already signed with a Euro team back in Spain.
User avatar
LakersForLife00
Ballboy
Posts: 2
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 22, 2010

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#15 » by LakersForLife00 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:28 pm

stunnar0b wrote:Shaun Livingston

Javaris Crittenton

Steve Blake


We have Crittenton, he's on our summer league team. I hope he does well because he's got talent and I'd like to have him on the team.
I'd still also like to keep DFish. Not sure about Shannon and Farmar, trade them both as far as I'm concerned.

Personally of all the PG's available I prefer Ridnour. Dude's a baller.
LA dreaming!
User avatar
butter17
Starter
Posts: 2,412
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 18, 2009
Location: Compton CA. A.K.A LAKERLAND.

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#16 » by butter17 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:26 pm

It_Was_Typed wrote:Image
+1 +1 +1 Shaun livingston is the perfect point guard for us. He's 6' 7, has pretty good defense, can shoot the ball, and can penatrate to the basket. He is perfect for the triangle offense.
P.J loves big point guards.
Image
dabien2
Freshman
Posts: 87
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 20, 2010
Location: Lakerland

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#17 » by dabien2 » Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:07 am

butter17 wrote:
It_Was_Typed wrote:Image
+1 +1 +1 Shaun livingston is the perfect point guard for us. He's 6' 7, has pretty good defense, can shoot the ball, and can penatrate to the basket. He is perfect for the triangle offense.
P.J loves big point guards.


Livingston would be a great fit for the Lakers, except for the fact that his knee practically exploded. He should be an after thought for the PG spot, not the main focus.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#18 » by dockingsched » Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:13 am

livingston can't shoot.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
LAKESHOW
RealGM
Posts: 18,064
And1: 4,471
Joined: Mar 14, 2002
Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#19 » by LAKESHOW » Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:47 am

dcash4 wrote:livingston can't shoot.


which is amazing consdering many dont want farmar or brown back. cause those guys can at least shoot the rock better than livingston.

and in the tri, movement to an open spot, then hitting the open man (which might be livingston), will have everyone clammoring on this board next year saying what phil jackson said about artest . . . "dont pass it to him, dont even pass him the ball"
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
User avatar
butter17
Starter
Posts: 2,412
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 18, 2009
Location: Compton CA. A.K.A LAKERLAND.

Re: Future PointGuard 

Post#20 » by butter17 » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:09 am

dcash4 wrote:livingston can't shoot.
No disrespect dcash but you must not have been watching the wizards play. I've seen a couple of games on him since he's been back in the league and his jumpshot is very good. It looks like he has gotting over that bad knee injury he suffered with the clipper. He actually looks better now than when he played for the clippers. I think he would be a perfect fit for us next season.
Image

Return to Los Angeles Lakers