Page 1 of 1
Lakers 2009 vs 2010
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:23 pm
by LAKERS_1981
This is simple how is a stronger team?
Yes this is mostly the same team(Ariza for Artest deal).
I think the 09 team run the triangle great but the 10 were mutch stronger on D.
Re: Lakers 2009 vs 2010
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:39 pm
by J08
not cool or a smart way to start your posting on RealGM
Re: Lakers 2009 vs 2010
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:50 pm
by LAKERS_1981
Nice comment.
I would pick the 2010 Lakers. They play harder on D and Gasol got the ball more. There O was not as good, and i thought Odom did a better job in the 2009 playoffs but Artest D on Durant and Pierce was great and it help the team so mutch to have a D-stoper.
Re: Lakers 2009 vs 2010
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:34 am
by Pablo Escobar
J08 wrote:not cool or a smart way to start your posting on RealGM
He's a Lebron fanboy
Re: Lakers 2009 vs 2010
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 2:42 am
by LAKERFAN24
2010 team was more injured than the 2009 team.
Kobe hand broken finger on his ring finger instead of his index finger, big difference
Bynum was more banged up in 2010 than 2009
When healthy 2010>2009
Re: Lakers 2009 vs 2010
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 7:26 am
by CodyB
I think 2010 was alot tougher than the 2009 team.
Re: Lakers 2009 vs 2010
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 6:20 pm
by Jase
Artest is the key.
Re: Lakers 2009 vs 2010
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 2:03 am
by Mamba Venom
2009
Kobes and Bynums health is they key.