

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
10scott10 wrote:He still counts for salary cap and luxury tax if he retires. It doesn't do anything to help the lakers, only gives them another roster spot to fill with the vet minimum
LApwnd wrote:10scott10 wrote:He still counts for salary cap and luxury tax if he retires. It doesn't do anything to help the lakers, only gives them another roster spot to fill with the vet minimum
so how did Por. get their medical exemption for Miles before he came back to mem and F that up?
semi-sentient wrote:His contract will be a valuable trade asset, especially for those looking to shed salary when it expires in 38 years.
Seriously, WTF were we thinking?
salmahayek wrote:J-far, you may be right, but some of that negativity would be curbed if Shaw takes over for Jackson and we continue with the triangle.
I think Luke runs our offense well and does a nice job of coming in and executing the offense when things seem to be going a little "helter skelter." He also does a nice job of feeding the post and trying to get our inside game going.
Luke is limited, but he does bring some qualities that can help the Lakers if properly used by the coach.
j-far wrote:salmahayek wrote:J-far, you may be right, but some of that negativity would be curbed if Shaw takes over for Jackson and we continue with the triangle.
I think Luke runs our offense well and does a nice job of coming in and executing the offense when things seem to be going a little "helter skelter." He also does a nice job of feeding the post and trying to get our inside game going.
Luke is limited, but he does bring some qualities that can help the Lakers if properly used by the coach.
He was good when he shot the 3 well and that was the main reason he got that contract from Mitch. Since then he's neither had the continuity nor a consistency to his game. I'm just scared that he might be a big reason we might consider trading Odom's salary this summer.
I hope not.
Phil XI wrote:
He can be useful to this team if he stays healthy.