Page 1 of 1
Steve Blake VS Luke Ridnour
Posted: Wed Jul 7, 2010 5:16 pm
by kooner
Who would you want on the lakers between these two guys. I preferred Ridnour because he is younger and I believe he has very high basketball IQ. I think ridnour would have been able to learn the triangle offense like Gasol did. Overall I think we could have got Ridnour for the same price and he would have been a better addition than Blake.
Re: Steve Blake VS Luke Ridnour
Posted: Wed Jul 7, 2010 5:29 pm
by LakersMoscow
I haven't seen Ridnour a lot. I think he's more talented playmaking-wise, but it doesn't matter that much for the Lakers. I think Blake has a chance to be a better defensive player. So I take Blake.
I thought Randy Foye is worth giving him a chance just to make regular season more interesting(it's always more interesting when you have some young guns capable to explode, not just savvy veterans for the playoffs). The only young guy we have capable to explode is Bynum. We could have 1 more guy with some kind of "upside" in the Lakers system.
Re: Steve Blake VS Luke Ridnour
Posted: Wed Jul 7, 2010 5:30 pm
by H00PDREAMS
Ridnour is a better starter on any NBA team than Blake. I think Blake is more solid on D. Ridnour would have been nice.
I even picked Ridnour to replace Fish as a starter on my Lakers NBA 2K10 team. So far he seems to have worked out HA!
Re: Steve Blake VS Luke Ridnour
Posted: Wed Jul 7, 2010 8:52 pm
by billmatic
Ridnour is garbage. Blake is a better defender and better shooter and fits the Lakers need MUCH better than Ridnour does.
Re: Steve Blake VS Luke Ridnour
Posted: Wed Jul 7, 2010 8:58 pm
by WorthyBlitz42
Ridnour is the better playmaker, but Blake is the better 3 point shooter. We run the triangle right? I think Blake will fit in easier, we don't run a conventional, princeton offense or any of that crap that most teams run.
Re: Steve Blake VS Luke Ridnour
Posted: Wed Jul 7, 2010 9:47 pm
by Gerald3Wallace
billmatic wrote:Ridnour is garbage. Blake is a better defender and better shooter and fits the Lakers need MUCH better than Ridnour does.
well..since i follow the bucks (beause of brandon jennings)...Ridnour is not garbage
Re: Steve Blake VS Luke Ridnour
Posted: Thu Jul 8, 2010 3:26 am
by Jase
I was thrilled to get Blake. He has a nasty streak that will come in handy in LA. He's a better shooter and defender, but Ridnour, IMHO, is the better floor leader. Considering we have Kobe, Fish and Lamar to handle the ball, we didn't need Ridnour as much.
Re: Steve Blake VS Luke Ridnour
Posted: Thu Jul 8, 2010 5:12 am
by So Gutta
We already had Luke Ridnour. His name was Jordan Farmar.
Actually Farmar > Ridnour.

Re: Steve Blake VS Luke Ridnour
Posted: Thu Jul 8, 2010 9:09 pm
by WorthyBlitz42
So Gutta wrote:We already had Luke Ridnour. His name was Jordan Farmar.
Actually Farmar > Ridnour.

Not even close

Farmar is a selfish low IQ player with athleticism, Ridnour is the complete opposite.
Re: Steve Blake VS Luke Ridnour
Posted: Thu Jul 8, 2010 9:36 pm
by Gerald3Wallace
LOL at farmar being better than ridnour