Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?

Wiz Khalifa · Post #1 » by **Wiz Khalifa** » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:48 am

Simple question.

Next season being even harder with Wade, Lebron, and Bosh. But that's a team that only looks good on paper as of right now.

If the Lakers are able to win another championship next season, would you call this a dynasty considering the degree of difficulty there is in repeating 3 seasons in a row.

microfib4thewin · Post #2 » by **microfib4thewin** » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:56 am

It would certainly be the most impressive title run if they beat a Heat team in good shape, but I would hardly call a 4 year title contender a dynasty.

Post #3 » by **dockingsched** » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:56 am

3 titles in a row are a dynasty. throw in 4 straight finals, yeah.

kooner · Post #4 » by **kooner** » Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:25 am

for sure

LAKESHOW · Post #5 » by **LAKESHOW** » Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:39 am

80s, most titles - LAKERs
90s, most titles - bulls
2000s, most titles - LAKERs
this decade?

we are in the lead with 1. and are about to win twice this decade in 2 years. which means if we 3peat, and we will be on a run to take another decade and dominate once again. our 3rd dynasty in 4 decades.

That Nicka · Post #6 » by **That Nicka** » Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:46 am

Flipdog69xxx · Post #7 » by **Flipdog69xxx** » Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:00 am

dcash4 wrote:3 titles in a row are a dynasty. throw in 4 straight finals, yeah.

Dr Aki · Post #8 » by **Dr Aki** » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:16 pm

pretty much the definition of a dynasty

The Skyhook · Post #9 » by **The Skyhook** » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:21 pm

dcash4 wrote:3 titles in a row are a dynasty. throw in 4 straight finals, yeah.

+1 No arguing against that.

TonyMontana · Post #10 » by **TonyMontana** » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:40 pm

Im going to pad my posts and say........................ YES

animal1974 · Post #11 » by **animal1974** » Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:45 pm

I better call it a Foot to ass for LeFake James. :cheesygrin:

But it's a dynasty for sure.

supermario · Post #12 » by **supermario** » Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:47 pm

Of Course.

Cookin Baskets · Post #13 » by **Cookin Baskets** » Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:06 pm

Yea for sure 3 titles would do it, with 4 finals appearances. Plus Lakers are basically a dynasty as team in the 21st century 2000,2001,2002,2009,2010. Can't wait till L.A vs. Miami for sure. Defending champs against a team that claims they will win multiple titles.

inrapscity · Post #14 » by **inrapscity** » Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:03 am

um............. duh

and if against heat. what a way to do the 3-peat!

LAKERS_1981 · Post #15 » by **LAKERS_1981** » Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:10 am

I say Yes.

Mamba Venom · Post #16 » by **Mamba Venom** » Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:17 am

Hell YES

If they did they would do what Shaq/Kobe did in 5 years, a Finals loss and 3 wins in a row

PLUS they did it since they were teamed up. Shaq didnt carry the Lakers to the Finals UNTIL Kobe became the closer.

ShowtimeFan · Post #17 » by **ShowtimeFan** » Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:55 am

Three straight titles and four straight Finals appearences,

Heck Yeah, the Bulls with MJ never did that...