Page 1 of 1
Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:48 am
by Wiz Khalifa
Simple question.
Next season being even harder with Wade, Lebron, and Bosh. But that's a team that only looks good on paper as of right now.
If the Lakers are able to win another championship next season, would you call this a dynasty considering the degree of difficulty there is in repeating 3 seasons in a row.
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:56 am
by microfib4thewin
It would certainly be the most impressive title run if they beat a Heat team in good shape, but I would hardly call a 4 year title contender a dynasty.
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:56 am
by dockingsched
3 titles in a row are a dynasty. throw in 4 straight finals, yeah.
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:25 am
by kooner
for sure
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:39 am
by LAKESHOW
80s, most titles - LAKERs
90s, most titles - bulls
2000s, most titles - LAKERs
this decade?
we are in the lead with 1. and are about to win twice this decade in 2 years. which means if we 3peat, and we will be on a run to take another decade and dominate once again. our 3rd dynasty in 4 decades.
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:46 am
by That Nicka
Yes
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:00 am
by Flipdog69xxx
dcash4 wrote:3 titles in a row are a dynasty. throw in 4 straight finals, yeah.
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:16 pm
by Dr Aki
pretty much the definition of a dynasty
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:21 pm
by The Skyhook
dcash4 wrote:3 titles in a row are a dynasty. throw in 4 straight finals, yeah.
+1 No arguing against that.
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:40 pm
by TonyMontana
Im going to pad my posts and say........................ YES
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:45 pm
by animal1974
I better call it a
Foot to ass for LeFake James.
But it's a dynasty for sure.
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:47 pm
by supermario
Of Course.
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:06 pm
by Cookin Baskets
Yea for sure 3 titles would do it, with 4 finals appearances. Plus Lakers are basically a dynasty as team in the 21st century 2000,2001,2002,2009,2010. Can't wait till L.A vs. Miami for sure. Defending champs against a team that claims they will win multiple titles.
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:03 am
by inrapscity
um............. duh
and if against heat. what a way to do the 3-peat!
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:10 am
by LAKERS_1981
I say Yes.
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:17 am
by Mamba Venom
Hell YES
If they did they would do what Shaq/Kobe did in 5 years, a Finals loss and 3 wins in a row
PLUS they did it since they were teamed up. Shaq didnt carry the Lakers to the Finals UNTIL Kobe became the closer.
Re: Would you call the Kobe-Gasol era a dynasty if they 3peated?
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:55 am
by ShowtimeFan
Three straight titles and four straight Finals appearences,
Heck Yeah, the Bulls with MJ never did that...