Page 1 of 1
Why not target Fredette?
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 2:35 pm
by thegamefritz
We need badly a pur shooter than can spread the floor and hit 3's
I guess we can get Jimmer Fredette with our 2nd rounders plus Shannon Brown and or Steve Blake!
then sign a PG for MLE..
Re: Why not target Fredette?
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 3:04 pm
by The_Trade_Seer
Shannon Brown is almost worthless on the trade market as he basically has no contract and would have to agree to an S&T which he doesn't need to do as an unrestricted FA ... Jimmer is going to go somewhere between 13-20 so our 2nd rounders wouldn't get it done ... our best bet would be the Wizards trade that lands us the #4 and #18 ... BUT ... if you want Jimmer at the #18 than who in the world do we take with the #4? I'd much rather have a Kemba Walker at #4 and whatever is left at #18 such as Noguiera, one of the Morris twins, Ken Faried, etc ... but if we get Jimmer at #18, there is no one at #4 that is really worth that high pick ... to bad Barnes, Henson, Zeller, Terrence Jones, Sullinger, Perry Jones, etc, didn't enter this draft, it would have much, much deeper.
Re: Why not target Fredette?
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 8:00 pm
by mowens04
Jimmer doesn't really solve our biggest problem - the need for a PG. He's a great player and all, but honestly, I don't view him as much more than a slightly more athletic JJ Redick, and I think if he goes anywhere higher than the end of the first, it's going to be a reach. He's an undersized SG that I think is going to have a lot of problems creating for himself at the NBA level, largely due to his lack of height at that position. He's a great shooter and a pretty good ball handler, I will give him that, but he's not a PG, which is what the Lakers need.
Re: Why not target Fredette?
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 8:20 pm
by Pablo Escobar
Hell NO!! I don't want that guy anywhere near purple n gold
Re: Why not target Fredette?
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 8:37 pm
by Gek
He's not going anywhere near the second round. Our best bet for a PG in the draft is Cory Joseph from Texas imo, got s more immediate contribution go with Shelvin Mack. No one ever reads my draft thread though
.
Re: Why not target Fredette?
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 8:42 pm
by Slava
Not many people watch the NCAA. Its not manly enough without atleast 60 FTs a game.
Re: Why not target Fredette?
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 8:44 pm
by Optms
KB24_ILLMATIC wrote:Hell NO!! I don't want that guy anywhere near purple n gold
Re: Why not target Fredette?
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 9:57 pm
by Leor_77
We need someone who is quick/athletic and can play defense - Can he do this? No.
Re: Why not target Fredette?
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 11:28 pm
by frozt
Fredette isn't going to be good man he's going to be Adam Morrison 2.0.
also watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtsJJw9j2bM
Re: Why not target Fredette?
Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 1:31 am
by The_Trade_Seer
I'll take Corey Joseph any day of the week ... kid can really ball and has a ton of potential ... I also love his canadian teammate Tristan.
Re: Why not target Fredette?
Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 2:39 am
by Hunter103
He's going to retire with back to back rings?