ImageImageImageImageImage

Andrew Bynum

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 20,137
And1: 8,916
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Andrew Bynum 

Post#1 » by iamworthy » Sat May 21, 2011 6:47 am

The Lakers ripped off a run of 17 wins in 18 games, during which Bynum was awesome. Particularly so in 11 March games, in which Bynum finished with fewer than 12 rebounds twice, and had eight multi-block games. As a team, the Lakers allowed only 91.3 points a game for the month, holding opponents to 42 percent shooting -- their best marks of the season. Again, this was the influence of Bynum. He was changing shots to the point ESPN.com's J.A. Adande actually invented a stat for him (S.A.B.O.A., or Shots Altered by Bynum's Outstretched Arms). Scoring became secondary (though he still did enough of it), as for the first time in his career, Bynum truly committed to the idea of dominating defensively and on the glass, something the Lakers had implored of him for years.

Turned out, he kinda liked it.
In April, Bynum had a three-game stretch in which he snagged 56 rebounds. Overall, following the break, Bynum shot over 60 percent from the field, and averaged 12.4 rebounds in only 31 minutes per game. Huge numbers, in terms of boards per minute. In the playoffs, Bynum posted 15 points and 10.3 boards, with nearly two blocks in six games against the Hornets, and had two very productive games against the Mavs, which is more than most of his teammates could say. Overall, Bynum graduated from "guy who elevates L.A.'s title hopes simply by being present and extremely tall" to "guy who elevates L.A.'s title chances because he's a bad, bad man." It was the best run of sustained success seen from Bynum since the start of the 2007-08 season, before suffering the knee injury opening the door for Pau Gasol's arrival.

Put together, it was everything about the risk/reward associated with Bynum. Moments of great potential and performance mixed with questions of health (you can't forget the missed games) and maturity, less regarding his jaunt to South Africa and more about worrisome, suspension worthy fouls delivered to Michael Beasley and J.J. Barea, the latter costing him the first five games of next year, whenever it rolls around.

Nor is his future in L.A. iron clad. Bynum's trade value will never be higher than it is right now. The Lakers have needs, and a serious financial decision to make on him. Add in hints he may not be so satisfied with third-to-fourth banana status going forward, and there are plenty of questions.
http://espn.go.com/blog/los-angeles/lak ... drew-bynum


Bynum is going to make 15 mill next year with a team option at 16 mill the year after that. What should we do with the young fella. When he is on his game I wouldn't trade him for any other center. The problem is consistency. As a laker fan I pretty much understand Jim Buss's intentions. He loves Bynum like Cuban loves Dirk. With the new CBA whatever that may be, it could cripple the lakers if we give him max dollars. decisions, decisions. IMO sign him and hope he becomes what we all think he can become.
Image
User avatar
Pablo Escobar
Head Coach
Posts: 7,286
And1: 4,769
Joined: May 13, 2009
Location: MedellĂ­n
 

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#2 » by Pablo Escobar » Sat May 21, 2011 2:54 pm

Keep him, he was the most consistent in the playoffs and was still the 3rd option even though the 2nd option sucked balls
Plata o Plomo?
User avatar
RiotSweetie
Analyst
Posts: 3,457
And1: 221
Joined: May 18, 2011
Location: LA

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#3 » by RiotSweetie » Sat May 21, 2011 4:09 pm

Other than Kobe, he's the only player who proved that he deserves his spot in this organization. Our defense is ish without him. And he's showing more emotion out there than he did his previous years combined, which I know was a problem for some people.
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 20,137
And1: 8,916
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#4 » by iamworthy » Sat May 21, 2011 4:21 pm

RiotSweetie wrote:Other than Kobe, he's the only player who proved that he deserves his spot in this organization. Our defense is ish without him. And he's showing more emotion out there than he did his previous years combined, which I know was a problem for some people.


Agree 100%
Image
User avatar
snaquille oatmeal
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,819
And1: 4,827
Joined: Nov 15, 2005
Location: San Diego
   

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#5 » by snaquille oatmeal » Sat May 21, 2011 4:27 pm

unless there is a better deal on the table (Howard) he stays.
Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
User avatar
TylersLakers
RealGM
Posts: 10,961
And1: 2,867
Joined: Jan 20, 2006
Location: Winnipeg Canada
     

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#6 » by TylersLakers » Sat May 21, 2011 4:31 pm

snaquille oatmeal wrote:unless there is a better deal on the table (Howard) he stays.


Yup.

And if we could trade Gasol for a PG like Paul or Williams.. I would seriously look into it.
Image
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#7 » by Jetset » Sat May 21, 2011 4:40 pm

snaquille oatmeal wrote:unless there is a better deal on the table (Howard) he stays.


Pretty much this.
User avatar
snaquille oatmeal
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,819
And1: 4,827
Joined: Nov 15, 2005
Location: San Diego
   

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#8 » by snaquille oatmeal » Sat May 21, 2011 4:54 pm

TylersLakers wrote:

Yup.

And if we could trade Gasol for a PG like Paul or Williams.. I would seriously look into it.

I would be really careful with this. you can't expect to fix one hole by creating another. yes we do need a PG, but not at the expense of a PF. the key is using our garbage/expendable players for a PG. difficult, but not impossible after all we got an insider in Golden State.
Luke, Fish, Brown for Curry, Do it Mitch and Jerry :lol:
Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
ALL HAIL
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,474
And1: 1,213
Joined: Dec 27, 2005

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#9 » by ALL HAIL » Sat May 21, 2011 5:35 pm

If Irving slips to #2, Gasol to Minny for Irving, Milicic, and filler (Pekovic/Flynn).

Unless you find a better big, you keep Bynum. Trading Gasol DOES NOT leave a huge hole behind because of the presence of Odom.

The Lakers would just have to sign another backup center (in addition to Milicic) and a backup, spark plug PF (Thad Young/Carl Landry) and they'd be rolling:

PG - Blake - Irving
SG - Bryant - Fisher - SG depth
C - Bynum - Mohammed - Milicic
PF - Odom - Landry - Pekovic
SF - Barnes - Artest (30 mins off the bench; for offensive spark) - Ebanks

Irving, Artest, and Landry give this team consistent spark off the bench.
User avatar
snaquille oatmeal
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,819
And1: 4,827
Joined: Nov 15, 2005
Location: San Diego
   

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#10 » by snaquille oatmeal » Sat May 21, 2011 6:05 pm

ALL HAIL wrote:If Irving slips to #2, Gasol to Minny for Irving, Milicic, and filler (Pekovic/Flynn).

Unless you find a better big, you keep Bynum. Trading Gasol DOES NOT leave a huge hole behind because of the presence of Odom.

The Lakers would just have to sign another backup center (in addition to Milicic) and a backup, spark plug PF (Thad Young/Carl Landry) and they'd be rolling:

PG - Blake - Irving
SG - Bryant - Fisher - SG depth
C - Bynum - Mohammed - Milicic
PF - Odom - Landry - Pekovic
SF - Barnes - Artest (30 mins off the bench; for offensive spark) - Ebanks

Irving, Artest, and Landry give this team consistent spark off the bench.
other than not fixing our pg issues that's a good dream fix.
Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
User avatar
Anklebreaker702
RealGM
Posts: 13,946
And1: 164
Joined: Mar 29, 2008
Location: Las Vegas (2nd Home of the Lakers)
   

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#11 » by Anklebreaker702 » Sat May 21, 2011 7:57 pm

iamworthy wrote:
The Lakers ripped off a run of 17 wins in 18 games, during which Bynum was awesome. Particularly so in 11 March games, in which Bynum finished with fewer than 12 rebounds twice, and had eight multi-block games. As a team, the Lakers allowed only 91.3 points a game for the month, holding opponents to 42 percent shooting -- their best marks of the season. Again, this was the influence of Bynum. He was changing shots to the point ESPN.com's J.A. Adande actually invented a stat for him (S.A.B.O.A., or Shots Altered by Bynum's Outstretched Arms). Scoring became secondary (though he still did enough of it), as for the first time in his career, Bynum truly committed to the idea of dominating defensively and on the glass, something the Lakers had implored of him for years.

Turned out, he kinda liked it.
In April, Bynum had a three-game stretch in which he snagged 56 rebounds. Overall, following the break, Bynum shot over 60 percent from the field, and averaged 12.4 rebounds in only 31 minutes per game. Huge numbers, in terms of boards per minute. In the playoffs, Bynum posted 15 points and 10.3 boards, with nearly two blocks in six games against the Hornets, and had two very productive games against the Mavs, which is more than most of his teammates could say. Overall, Bynum graduated from "guy who elevates L.A.'s title hopes simply by being present and extremely tall" to "guy who elevates L.A.'s title chances because he's a bad, bad man." It was the best run of sustained success seen from Bynum since the start of the 2007-08 season, before suffering the knee injury opening the door for Pau Gasol's arrival.

Put together, it was everything about the risk/reward associated with Bynum. Moments of great potential and performance mixed with questions of health (you can't forget the missed games) and maturity, less regarding his jaunt to South Africa and more about worrisome, suspension worthy fouls delivered to Michael Beasley and J.J. Barea, the latter costing him the first five games of next year, whenever it rolls around.

Nor is his future in L.A. iron clad. Bynum's trade value will never be higher than it is right now. The Lakers have needs, and a serious financial decision to make on him. Add in hints he may not be so satisfied with third-to-fourth banana status going forward, and there are plenty of questions.
http://espn.go.com/blog/los-angeles/lak ... drew-bynum


Bynum is going to make 15 mill next year with a team option at 16 mill the year after that. What should we do with the young fella. When he is on his game I wouldn't trade him for any other center. The problem is consistency. As a laker fan I pretty much understand Jim Buss's intentions. He loves Bynum like Cuban loves Dirk. With the new CBA whatever that may be, it could cripple the lakers if we give him max dollars. decisions, decisions. IMO sign him and hope he becomes what we all think he can become.

After the serious scrap outs we had towards the end of the season Big Game, I will say this. I agree 100% :lol:
VETERAN LAKER FAN
User avatar
Speedlot
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,164
And1: 720
Joined: Jan 01, 2007
         

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#12 » by Speedlot » Sat May 21, 2011 8:03 pm

ALL HAIL wrote:If Irving slips to #2, Gasol to Minny for Irving, Milicic, and filler (Pekovic/Flynn).

Unless you find a better big, you keep Bynum. Trading Gasol DOES NOT leave a huge hole behind because of the presence of Odom.

The Lakers would just have to sign another backup center (in addition to Milicic) and a backup, spark plug PF (Thad Young/Carl Landry) and they'd be rolling:

PG - Blake - Irving
SG - Bryant - Fisher - SG depth
C - Bynum - Mohammed - Milicic
PF - Odom - Landry - Pekovic
SF - Barnes - Artest (30 mins off the bench; for offensive spark) - Ebanks

Irving, Artest, and Landry give this team consistent spark off the bench.


What's so dreamy about that. It's like 2007 pre Gasol all over again.
User avatar
Anklebreaker702
RealGM
Posts: 13,946
And1: 164
Joined: Mar 29, 2008
Location: Las Vegas (2nd Home of the Lakers)
   

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#13 » by Anklebreaker702 » Sat May 21, 2011 8:05 pm

TylersLakers wrote:
snaquille oatmeal wrote:unless there is a better deal on the table (Howard) he stays.


Yup.

And if we could trade Gasol for a PG like Paul or Williams.. I would seriously look into it.

Guys here's the thing about D12. I am admittingly a Bynum supporter but I would do what's best for the team in a heartbeat before having a soft spot for ANY player.

Our biggest concern right now is the 1 & 4 not the 5. I heard one of the talk show guys (can't remember who it was) say ok D12 is the best Center right now bar none but the only other Center you can mention in his class right now is AB17. Basically what he was saying is you'd be giving up #2 for #1 when the concerns are deeper @ other positions & I agree.

If Drew stays healthy he is actually a very dominant big man on both ends of the floor. If the Lakers increase his role he will shorten the gap even more between he & Howard. Believe me, there's a difference between being a 3rd option & getting to touch the ball nearly every time down the floor.
VETERAN LAKER FAN
User avatar
Anklebreaker702
RealGM
Posts: 13,946
And1: 164
Joined: Mar 29, 2008
Location: Las Vegas (2nd Home of the Lakers)
   

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#14 » by Anklebreaker702 » Sat May 21, 2011 8:07 pm

KB24_ILLMATIC wrote:Keep him, he was the most consistent in the playoffs and was still the 3rd option even though the 2nd option sucked balls

Hands down!
VETERAN LAKER FAN
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#15 » by DEEP3CL » Sat May 21, 2011 9:20 pm

Speedlot wrote:
ALL HAIL wrote:If Irving slips to #2, Gasol to Minny for Irving, Milicic, and filler (Pekovic/Flynn).

Unless you find a better big, you keep Bynum. Trading Gasol DOES NOT leave a huge hole behind because of the presence of Odom.

The Lakers would just have to sign another backup center (in addition to Milicic) and a backup, spark plug PF (Thad Young/Carl Landry) and they'd be rolling:

PG - Blake - Irving
SG - Bryant - Fisher - SG depth
C - Bynum - Mohammed - Milicic
PF - Odom - Landry - Pekovic
SF - Barnes - Artest (30 mins off the bench; for offensive spark) - Ebanks

Irving, Artest, and Landry give this team consistent spark off the bench.


What's so dreamy about that. It's like 2007 pre Gasol all over again.

I'll tell you what is do dreamy about it.............a Gasol scenario isn't happening again period. Further more Odom isn't a true PF, didn't we or did we not struggle in the years LO manned the PF ? Third Minny isn't going to give a pick that high for a soon to be 31 year old PF with issues on how tough he'll be year in and year out.

This is why snaquille said it's a dream fix, I know we all have good intentions on how to fix our major problems. But the thing is you kinda have to think in the realm of reality, nobody is going to "gift" us anything. Kyrie Irving may go 2nd, but that'll only be because Derrick Williams went 1st, bottom though is Minny still won't trade the pick.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
User avatar
Wavy Q
RealGM
Posts: 24,317
And1: 2,390
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Location: Pull Up
     

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#16 » by Wavy Q » Sat May 21, 2011 9:30 pm

Maybe Khan will trade it to us for Steve Blake to be rebellious against the evil rigged NBA draft.
User avatar
LascelleL
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,284
And1: 2,219
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
Location: Toronto
   

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#17 » by LascelleL » Sat May 21, 2011 10:53 pm

Trade you bargs and our pick for him
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#18 » by Jetset » Sat May 21, 2011 11:02 pm

^ Convince Bargnani to rebound and get the #1 overall pick. Then we'll talk.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#19 » by dockingsched » Sun May 22, 2011 1:01 am

DEEP3CL wrote:I'll tell you what is do dreamy about it.............a Gasol scenario isn't happening again period. Further more Odom isn't a true PF, didn't we or did we not struggle in the years LO manned the PF ? Third Minny isn't going to give a pick that high for a soon to be 31 year old PF with issues on how tough he'll be year in and year out.

This is why snaquille said it's a dream fix, I know we all have good intentions on how to fix our major problems. But the thing is you kinda have to think in the realm of reality, nobody is going to "gift" us anything. Kyrie Irving may go 2nd, but that'll only be because Derrick Williams went 1st, bottom though is Minny still won't trade the pick.


two straight titles and 3 trips to the finals with LO playing nothing but power forward, throw in a 6th man award playing only PF too.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
Pablo Escobar
Head Coach
Posts: 7,286
And1: 4,769
Joined: May 13, 2009
Location: MedellĂ­n
 

Re: Andrew Bynum 

Post#20 » by Pablo Escobar » Sun May 22, 2011 1:39 am

LascelleL wrote:Trade you bargs and our pick for him


loool hell naw man haha Bargs makes Pau look like Shaq in his prime when it comes to toughness :lol:
Plata o Plomo?

Return to Los Angeles Lakers