Roll Tide Baaby wrote:11 straight? haha good God. there last season together they got raped by detroit. they were done there. Shaq wasnt the same after that. It took a hercules type series by wade to get shaq his 4th. They MAYBE could have gotten 1 more, but thats a big maybe. what the hecks that guy talking about 11 in a row lol. maybe one more to make it 4 instead of 3. but even the 1 more would have taken a phenomenal performace by kobe
They won exactly how many they should have won...
The question was not reality-based... It was purely hypothetical based on absolutely ideal situations.
Namely that Shaq and Kobe could have gotten along. That would have taken them putting aside their differences, coming to terms with the team and the financial realities of the league and maintaining a title contender, being motivated to play together, etc, etc, etc... It's a monumental stretch... And all we have to go on is the few seasons when they really clicked...
They already had 3... Shaq clearly had at least 6 more dominant seasons ahead of him (Who knows how many if he took the game and staying in shape seriously)... And Kobe was just coming into his dominant faze and had many more ahead of him...
So yes... IF they could have done all those things... And IF the FO had the financial flexibility to surround them consistently with decent talent... And IF everything else fell into place, I think they had A SHOT at challenging the record...
But if you take that large a leap, so could just about any team... I just think it was more likely for that team because the rest of the league was so far behind as far as talent and completeness...
The point is, they were clearly a better duo that Wade/LeBrick and would have surely won, Not 1, Not 2, Not 3, Not 4... More titles...