ImageImageImageImageImage

Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15 pts"

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

User avatar
Jordan-esque
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,412
And1: 399
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15 pts" 

Post#1 » by Jordan-esque » Mon Apr 2, 2012 4:32 pm

Sorry Andrew Goudelock fans, but it looks like Mike Brown is not going to play him anytime soon...

http://espn.go.com/blog/los-angeles/lak ... port-video

Link: ESPN Radio

Mike Brown on why Andrew Goudelock is not getting minutes:

"For a young guy he was doing a terrific job for where he was or what we asked of him. But having said that, he did not create a ton of shots for himself nor for his teammates. It wasn't like he was getting 14 or 15 points or double figure points off the bench, and so I don't think it's as big a deal or as big a difference when you're looking at production, point-wise, that he was giving us on a night in night out basis."


Image


If only Goudelock could play more like Steve Blake and just average about 4 points but try to create a "TON of shots for himself or his teammates"...
Sedale Threatt
RealGM
Posts: 50,967
And1: 45,151
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15 

Post#2 » by Sedale Threatt » Mon Apr 2, 2012 4:35 pm

he did not create a ton of shots for himself nor for his teammates

I understand Goudelock is not a PG, but it's not like Blake does this, either. Steve has achieved Fish status -- a good game is when he does not completely suck.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15  

Post#3 » by dockingsched » Mon Apr 2, 2012 4:51 pm

i'm done with this guy.

#TeamAmnestyBrown
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
poorboy
Banned User
Posts: 357
And1: 2
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
Location: Irvine, Ca

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15 

Post#4 » by poorboy » Mon Apr 2, 2012 5:08 pm

Where to begin with this...First he says he was doing what we asked of him, then he says it wasnt like he was getting 14 or 15 off the bench for us...Sounds like a bunch of excuses from a guy who is trying to dig himself out of his own grave.

First of all, Mike Brown is right, He wasnt getting 14-15 off the bench but who in the Nba is..
Second, the one thing the bench was missing was scoring and goudelocke was the only one providing that, as well as the only one off the bench who could create his own shot. So I dont no what the hell he is talking about, but he probably doesnt no either.
Third, as Sedale mentioned, who the hell creates shots for others on this team besides Sessions and sometimes Kobe..Even when Blake was in his prime dropping 30 on the Lakers, he never created shots for others.

Mike Brown is not just a dumb coach, hes an idiot.
ROballer
General Manager
Posts: 9,711
And1: 2,965
Joined: Sep 06, 2009
Location: Romania
   

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15 

Post#5 » by ROballer » Mon Apr 2, 2012 5:47 pm

What a **** moron

14 or 15 pts a game?Is he (Please Use More Appropriate Word) or something?When he played him at backup SG he would play him anywhere from 4 to 12-13 minutes,not more,cause he's got no balls to sit Kobe,even when he's chucking like crazy

How can he expect 14-15 pts a game WHEN HE DIDN'T EVEN PLAY THE DUDE ENOUGH

When he DID play him somewhat decent minutes(Blake injury),he gave us 10 ppg in 20 mpg on excellent efficiency(over 50% from the floor and 3 point line)..not bad for his (Please Use More Appropriate Word) standards, "production, point-wise"...10 pts in 20 minutes aint bad at all,especially for a rookie

He's beginning to annoy me,he looks for excuses to justify not playing a guy who played better than
the backup PG and with each quote he digs himself a bigger hole,just idiotic excuses

I was hoping after Phil retired that we'll se some logic rotations for once(not based on experience,hating on the rookies or other lame ****) and play the better guy but I was wrong...it's even worse
Steve Nash injures his back while carrying bags

Slava wrote:I pulled a hammy while fapping. I won't make fun of Nash.
User avatar
Gek
RealGM
Posts: 38,024
And1: 1,807
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15  

Post#6 » by Gek » Mon Apr 2, 2012 5:56 pm

I have no problem with Glock sitting. Why does everyone want an undersized SG from the a small DI school to play back-up PG? Barnes back-up SG minutes are much more productive for the team. His efficiency was sporadic and often front loaded (hit his first two shots then miss the next three). Our team would not improve at all with him getting more minutes.
#teamhermes
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
User avatar
snaquille oatmeal
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,819
And1: 4,826
Joined: Nov 15, 2005
Location: San Diego
   

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15 

Post#7 » by snaquille oatmeal » Mon Apr 2, 2012 6:15 pm

Gek wrote:I have no problem with Glock sitting. Why does everyone want an undersized SG from the a small DI school to play back-up PG? Barnes back-up SG minutes are much more productive for the team. His efficiency was sporadic and often front loaded (hit his first two shots then miss the next three). Our team would not improve at all with him getting more minutes.
I reluctantly agree with this, but imo he was doing better than Blake when he played pg.
Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
dirtymike
Rookie
Posts: 1,235
And1: 168
Joined: Jul 15, 2010
Contact:
       

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15 

Post#8 » by dirtymike » Mon Apr 2, 2012 6:21 pm

snaquille oatmeal wrote:
Gek wrote:I have no problem with Glock sitting. Why does everyone want an undersized SG from the a small DI school to play back-up PG? Barnes back-up SG minutes are much more productive for the team. His efficiency was sporadic and often front loaded (hit his first two shots then miss the next three). Our team would not improve at all with him getting more minutes.
I reluctantly agree with this, but imo he was doing better than Blake when he played pg.

EXACTLY!!!! He was a rookie so what do you expect! He gave the bench a spark when he came in. I am really beginning to dislike this coach. :(
Plan B: Make Plan A work- Dirty Mike
User avatar
miggs
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,688
And1: 446
Joined: May 04, 2008
Location: fear and loathing in reseda
 

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15 

Post#9 » by miggs » Mon Apr 2, 2012 6:24 pm

dockingsched wrote:i'm done with this guy.

#TeamAmnestyBrown


#TeamAmnestyBrown
2014: Randle / Clarkson
2015: Russell / Nance
2016: Ingram / Zubac
2017: Top 3 Pick? :nod: Fultz, Ball or Bust
User avatar
Draper
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,531
And1: 14
Joined: Dec 03, 2011

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15  

Post#10 » by Draper » Mon Apr 2, 2012 6:26 pm

But having said that, he did not create a ton of shots for himself nor for his teammates.


He's a shooting guard, that's not part of his game. But even when Blake was hurt he did a decent job of managing the point guard position.

It wasn't like he was getting 14 or 15 points or double figure points off the bench.


Right, because scoring double figures is clearly a standard for our bench players. Oh and in the 7 game stretch between January and February when he was getting consistent minutes (15+ per game) he scored in double figures 4 times, averaging 10.3 per game.

#FireMikeBrown
RocketPower23
Banned User
Posts: 7,497
And1: 26
Joined: Dec 20, 2005

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15 

Post#11 » by RocketPower23 » Mon Apr 2, 2012 6:27 pm

Gek wrote:I have no problem with Glock sitting. Why does everyone want an undersized SG from the a small DI school to play back-up PG? Barnes back-up SG minutes are much more productive for the team. His efficiency was sporadic and often front loaded (hit his first two shots then miss the next three). Our team would not improve at all with him getting more minutes.

I think he appeal with Goudelock is that we less of Blake, give Kobe some time to rest and maybe give him some time when Kobe is sucking. The last two should be happening (he won't sit Blake, it just isn't going to happen). Worst of all, his logic is very poor, not averaging 14-15 points, are you kidding me?
User avatar
Father Time
Head Coach
Posts: 6,305
And1: 467
Joined: Dec 12, 2009
Location: Portland, OR
 

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15  

Post#12 » by Father Time » Mon Apr 2, 2012 6:33 pm

Mike brown, ladies and gentleman!
"There's nothing else I can do for them. I can give them some bulls---, and act like I'm a coach or something, but it's on them." - Popovich

Secret secrets are no fun. Secret secrets hurt someone.
User avatar
Wavy Q
RealGM
Posts: 24,317
And1: 2,390
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Location: Pull Up
     

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15 

Post#13 » by Wavy Q » Mon Apr 2, 2012 6:52 pm

I think we can all hop on board #TeamAmnestyBrown, even the #TeamDEEPSet scrubs
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,603
And1: 12,316
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15  

Post#14 » by Kilroy » Mon Apr 2, 2012 6:55 pm

I'm reluctant to jump on the MB Sucks bandwagon, but I've never been convinced of his leadership ability with a team like this and over-reactions not withstanding, it does start to appear that he might be losing the team a little bit.
With the Lakers, ever since Showtime, the Playoffs are the true gauge of the team and it's coaching staff, so I don't really care too much until then, but I'm not getting those confident vibes I like to see this late in the season...
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
bruddahmanmatt
Banned User
Posts: 4,879
And1: 4
Joined: Aug 11, 2010

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15  

Post#15 » by bruddahmanmatt » Mon Apr 2, 2012 7:13 pm

LOL. What rookie outside of Kyrie is putting up more than 14-15 PPG? :lol:

"He doesn't create for himself or others"


WAT? And Blake does? Goudelock isn't the best at getting looks for other players but he did an admirable job of creating for himself. The moment Goudelock demonstrated that he was a proficient three point shooter guys would close on him and that opened up room in the lane for his floater. He's not the greatest at creating for others but neither is Blake, and FWIW, the point in playing him would be to;

a. open up room in the lane for others by having Goudelock out on the perimeter as a legit deep threat

and

b. relieve some of the minutes on Bryant and even Barnes and MWP.

I mean WAKE THE F UP DUDE! We don't need him to drop 14-15 so much as we need him to reduce Bryant's PT. Furthermore, Barnes and MWP make for a solid defensive tandem, but you have to have a balanced lineup. Between Goudelock and Murph as a floor spacer I'd run with little Drew, and even then Murph should also be getting a bit of run as our 4th big. Four of our most important players (Bryant, Gasol, Barnes and MWP) are over 30 and this idiot is running our team into the ground with an eight man rotation. How stupid can you be? At the very least Goudelock and Murph take minutes off the legs of Bryant and Gasol.

I just want to say that I flat-out refused to trash on Brown before the start of the season as I thought he deserved a fair shake before we all assessed him as the coach of our team, but given how inept he's been when it comes to something as simple as the player rotation...I mean come on man.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fzrSeB-H-s[/youtube]
barrettcg
Pro Prospect
Posts: 875
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 30, 2006
Location: twentynine palms

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15  

Post#16 » by barrettcg » Mon Apr 2, 2012 7:19 pm

and I thought that Ph11ls rotations were strange sometimes? MB is off of his rocker and if he is allowed to continue to run the team next year I will have zero faith that the lake show can do anything but fall apart.
Image

united we stand divided we fall
User avatar
crimsonkb24
Senior
Posts: 629
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 31, 2010

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15  

Post#17 » by crimsonkb24 » Mon Apr 2, 2012 7:49 pm

Well, Brown is right, no need to go overboard on this
User avatar
Anklebreaker702
RealGM
Posts: 13,946
And1: 164
Joined: Mar 29, 2008
Location: Las Vegas (2nd Home of the Lakers)
   

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15 

Post#18 » by Anklebreaker702 » Mon Apr 2, 2012 8:21 pm

dockingsched wrote:i'm done with this guy.

#TeamAmnestyBrown

This guy is a horses a** I'm done with him too. So Blake is giving us that right?
VETERAN LAKER FAN
User avatar
Anklebreaker702
RealGM
Posts: 13,946
And1: 164
Joined: Mar 29, 2008
Location: Las Vegas (2nd Home of the Lakers)
   

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15 

Post#19 » by Anklebreaker702 » Mon Apr 2, 2012 8:28 pm

poorboy wrote:Where to begin with this...First he says he was doing what we asked of him, then he says it wasnt like he was getting 14 or 15 off the bench for us...Sounds like a bunch of excuses from a guy who is trying to dig himself out of his own grave.

First of all, Mike Brown is right, He wasnt getting 14-15 off the bench but who in the Nba is..
Second, the one thing the bench was missing was scoring and goudelocke was the only one providing that, as well as the only one off the bench who could create his own shot. So I dont no what the hell he is talking about, but he probably doesnt no either.
Third, as Sedale mentioned, who the hell creates shots for others on this team besides Sessions and sometimes Kobe..Even when Blake was in his prime dropping 30 on the Lakers, he never created shots for others.

Mike Brown is not just a dumb coach, hes an idiot.

This! Glad I didn't jump the gun on this guy. I've been saying for about a week now I had to change my stance & admit this was a bad hire & all he does each & everyday is confirm what I felt.
VETERAN LAKER FAN
AlexBarrera1
Rookie
Posts: 1,049
And1: 4
Joined: Nov 04, 2010
Location: Camarillo, CA

Re: Mike Brown: "Its not like Goudelock was giving us 14-15  

Post#20 » by AlexBarrera1 » Mon Apr 2, 2012 8:29 pm

At least he has more than one dimension in his game, unlike Blake. In fact, Blake barely has one dimension. I can see the issue with not making plays for others, but the guy can make a clean entry pass and that should be more than enough. And if him playing PG is an issue, play him at SG. He's the only other guard besides Kobe and Sessions that can create for himself, and was capable of putting up around 8-12 PPG if given the minutes and looks.

I knew Brown was dumb, but didn't realize he was this dumb.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers