Page 1 of 3
So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 4:17 am
by Speedlot
What do you guys think? Is is the hill trade much more valuable now?
Hill is so valuable to us whereas sessions seems so meh. Esp during this playoffs
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 4:20 am
by dockingsched
sessions is having a very good playoff run, what u talking aboot with the meh? his ability to control the tempo and set up the offense has been nothing short of amazing.
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 4:23 am
by Speedlot
I guess I undervalue Sessions a bit. I am stoked with hill though. His rebounding has been Odom like tbh.
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 4:23 am
by snaquille oatmeal
dockingsched wrote:sessions is having a very good playoff run, what u talking aboot with the meh? his ability to control the tempo and set up the offense has been nothing short of amazing.
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 4:24 am
by crazy8ights
No but they make our roster way better before the trade dead line that's for sure
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 4:28 am
by AlexBarrera1
You also can't compare a starting PG's value to a backup big's.
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 4:34 am
by Sofa King
Where are the Hill bandwagon sigs?
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 4:35 am
by crazyeights
AlexBarrera1 wrote:You also can't compare a starting PG's value to a backup big's.
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 4:44 am
by Kilroy
Apples/Oranges... But not sure why we can't be stoked about what both are doing...
I am.
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 5:00 am
by Rox_Nix_Nox
it's crazy how well hill is playing, that paycheck urgency
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 5:11 am
by Tee212
crazy8ights wrote:No but they make our roster way better before the trade dead line that's for sure
+1, this is just a bad comparison, both players filled our holes. sess is still the better trade imo.
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 5:25 am
by TheHartBreakKid
For a fast paced point guard being forced to play a slow pace, I don't see what Sessions can do better than he already is on the offensive end. Hill has been stellar imo...exactly what we need from our backup big...if only he could consistently make a 15 footer (he made one today). At the end of the day, Hill is an upgrade over Mcroberts, but Sessions is more than just an upgrade to Fish...he adds a whole new dimension to our team.
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 5:50 am
by EArl
wafer88 wrote:For a fast paced point guard being forced to play a slow pace, I don't see what Sessions can do better than he already is on the offensive end. Hill has been stellar imo...exactly what we need from our backup big...if only he could consistently make a 15 footer (he made one today). At the end of the day, Hill is an upgrade over Mcroberts, but Sessions is more than just an upgrade to Fish...he adds a whole new dimension to our team.
Having a pg that can single handedly take advantage of the fast break is awesome!
Having Jordan Hill doing what he is doing is a giant plus.
Mark these words: Jordan hill will be the X-factor in our triumph over the Thunder next round!
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 6:07 am
by tugs
Hill looks like he's giving a larger impact because we didn't expect anything from him.
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 6:20 am
by Jajwanda
Hill's impact in keeping the bench afloat is huge. You need to have someone like him against Oklahoma City and honestly I'm going back and watching OKC vs. Dallas and I'm not impressed at all by Dallas' D. It is complete garbage.
With Metta back, Barnes providing minutes at the 2, Ebanks at the 3 I feel like the Laker bench is coming on just enough to give them a chance.
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 6:32 am
by LaLa
Hill has been super consistent with his play, can't say the same for Sessions tbh. Not hating though loving what Sessions has brought, his defense hasn't been good plus he needs to learn how to freaking cut to the basket and let Pau or whoever's posting up the space to do their thing.
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 6:39 am
by Dr Aki
with the loss of lamar, we lost playmaking and rebounding.
we didnt have the chemistry down, but at the moment:
- pau has replaced lamar's outside shooting (at a better clip)
- pau has replaced lamar's playmaking
- jordan has replaced lamar's rebounding (a very pleasent surprise)
and mcbob/murphs are as they should be, glued to the bench as third stringers
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 6:40 am
by Dr Aki
LaLa wrote:Hill has been super consistent with his play, can't say the same for Sessions tbh. Not hating though loving what Sessions has brought, his defense hasn't been good plus he needs to learn how to freaking cut to the basket and let Pau or whoever's posting up the space to do their thing.
ramon was doing fine until mike brown told him to slow down and wait for the bigs instead of 1-man fast breaking all the time
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 11:36 am
by KB24TBOTB
You didn't see the Three sessions put in last in the game to put us up 3? That was huge, and show's he isn't scared of big moments which is real good news. As far as comparing Hill and Sessions goes, I love em both
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Posted: Mon May 7, 2012 2:46 pm
by picc
LOVE me some J. Hill, but no.