ImageImageImageImageImage

Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#1 » by dockingsched » Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:10 am

http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Robert-Sacre-5814/

Robert Sacre - 7 foot, senior, Gonzaga

Image

After a foot injury caused him to miss most of what became a redshirted 2008-2009 campaign, senior center Robert Sacre has been a consistent contributor for the Gonzaga Bulldogs.

Standing a legitimate 7 feet with an NBA ready frame, it's easy to see where the intrigue around Sacre begins. Sacre uses his size well, getting the majority of his half-court offense in the post, where most teams simply do not have the size to match up with him. Sacre does a good job of establishing position early and sealing off his defender, giving his teammates a clear entry pass and forcing defenders to foul, where his 8.5 free throw attempts per 40 minutes pace adjusted rank as one of the top numbers among centers in our database.

His post game, while still not overly diversified, has seen slight improvement. He's showing more over his right shoulder and has added a baseline spin move to go along with his more preferred moves, a right handed hook shot and turnaround fade-away jump shot. It's still fairly methodical and slow developing, but if he can continue to show increased diversity it will help him offset some of his athletic limitations.

His lack of explosiveness is the biggest question mark in projecting his post game to the next level, as he is neither overly quick out of his moves or explosive as a leaper, and he has his shot blocked more than you would hope for considering the size advantage he has on most nights. With the increased length and athleticism at the next level, and not having the kind of offensive diversity to date that would offset a drop in his productivity in the post, it brings into question how much of an offensive factor he could be at the next level.

Sacre's biggest offensive contributions outside of post-up situations has been on the offensive glass, where he effectively uses his size and high effort level to be a good offensive rebounder. He also moves well without the ball and has solid hands, although both of these strengths are again somewhat offset by his lack of vertical explosion and at times difficulty finishing in traffic, although his ability to get position and get fouled allows him to be efficient in these sets.

Sacre's improvement as a jump shooter is perhaps the area of his game that could help him the most. He appeared to improve somewhat as a set shooter, although the sample size is still small enough that he still has a lot to prove in this regard. His improvement in free throw percentage, from 62.9% to 82.3%, this past year, provides some level of comfort that this is an area that Sacre could add to his game, and it is paramount to his success at the next level.

Sacre is a very effective defender at the collegiate level, both in terms of team and man to man defense. He appears to get in a good stance defending the pick and roll and moves his feet better than expected, although he can be burned by misdirections and double moves, as he sometimes struggles to change direction. His defensive rotations aren't the quickest, but he appears to be a smart defender and has good recognition and knowledge of team concepts, and his length and timing allows him to be a weak side shot blocker. In the post is where he is the most comfortable defensively, and where he shows the most promise at the next level, as he does a good job of denying deep post position and uses his length to effectively disrupt offensive players.

Sacre's poor defensive rebounding -- his 5.8 defensive rebounds per 40 minutes pace adjusted ranks amongst the worst numbers for centers in our database, albeit an improvement over his 2009-2010 year -- is the other area that makes projecting him to the next level difficult. With the expected drop in offensive usage at the next level it would be much easier to project him as a role player if he was more of a contributor in this regard. He simply doesn't appear to be all that instinctual of a rebounder on this end of the court and he doesn't have the athleticism or quickness to make up for that.

Sacre's size and physical tools will continue to garner attention throughout the season, and much attention will likely be given to defensive ability and how that might translate. Showing scouts that he has the potential to develop an effective mid-range jump shot, allowing him to transition to an off the ball scorer away from being a primary focus in the post, could help as well. Perhaps most important will be whether he can shore up his defensive rebounding to allow him to be a consistent contributor even when his number is not being called offensively.

From DraftExpress.com http://www.draftexpress.com#ixzz1z9UarZ8f
http://www.draftexpress.com
User avatar
magic wand time
Junior
Posts: 479
And1: 6
Joined: Jun 13, 2012
Location: MagicWand.Mich

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#2 » by magic wand time » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:16 am

Thumbs up. Conference DPOY and draws fouls with his activity. Solid 3rd C for the next year or two.
Josephpaul
Banned User
Posts: 7,261
And1: 295
Joined: Jan 28, 2012

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#3 » by Josephpaul » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:22 am

Meh.
RamonSessions7
RealGM
Posts: 12,059
And1: 4,146
Joined: Feb 21, 2009
   

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#4 » by RamonSessions7 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:25 am

Great
User avatar
magic wand time
Junior
Posts: 479
And1: 6
Joined: Jun 13, 2012
Location: MagicWand.Mich

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#5 » by magic wand time » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:35 am

RamonSessions7 wrote:Great

You guys better stop messing around and get on board this band wagon. This is our guy when Bynum goes down again.
tlifeset
Pro Prospect
Posts: 893
And1: 92
Joined: May 24, 2005
Location: Laguna Beach, CA

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#6 » by tlifeset » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:45 am

now THIS is a pick I can get behind. You don't find quality 7 footers this late in drafts. I'm all for this pick - it's smart and he comes ready made, ready to play. Solid pick by Mitch.

DJM? Huh? So Brooklyn buys Tyshawn Taylor and we buy DJM? WHAT? In what world does Mitch and Jim Buss NOT think Tyshawn Taylor can't help this team immediately? Instead ... let's go with a carbon copy of Goudelock. Confused by that one.
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 38,252
And1: 9,956
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
     

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#7 » by TyCobb » Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:05 am

I love this pick.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
laduane1
Banned User
Posts: 2,216
And1: 29
Joined: Jul 04, 2008

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#8 » by laduane1 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:36 am

We will never see Sacre in a Laker uniform. Lakers will not spend any money on him. Stick him over in Europe forever.
User avatar
tugs
RealGM
Posts: 16,886
And1: 2,998
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#9 » by tugs » Fri Jun 29, 2012 7:44 am

so he's ala Jordan Hill? keep him and probably deal McRoberts. :dontknow:
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,477
And1: 25,504
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#10 » by hermes » Fri Jun 29, 2012 12:26 pm

he's the last pick in the draft, does he had a realistic shot at making the team?
User avatar
Sofa King
RealGM
Posts: 19,352
And1: 3,044
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#11 » by Sofa King » Fri Jun 29, 2012 12:57 pm

Does he plan on getting any more tattoos?
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,603
And1: 12,316
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#12 » by Kilroy » Fri Jun 29, 2012 2:06 pm

Nick-name: "Sacre Blue!"

He has the size and physicality... Might have a shot.
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
Penberthy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,704
And1: 243
Joined: Jul 06, 2010

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#13 » by Penberthy » Fri Jun 29, 2012 2:43 pm

hermes wrote:he's the last pick in the draft, does he had a realistic shot at making the team?


Ginobili 57
dirtymike
Rookie
Posts: 1,235
And1: 168
Joined: Jul 15, 2010
Contact:
       

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#14 » by dirtymike » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:04 pm

I like the pick. He was best available at that time. Plus, if we move one or both of our bigs, we are going to need a back up for whoever we bring in. He is alot better that McBob at the center position!
User avatar
Gek
RealGM
Posts: 38,024
And1: 1,807
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Contact:
       

Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#15 » by Gek » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:34 pm

Penberthy wrote:
hermes wrote:he's the last pick in the draft, does he had a realistic shot at making the team?


Ginobili 57
clearly everything about this pick makes it comparable to Ginobili.


@hermes: depends on why trades happen and whether or not we resign hill. I can't imagine he'll contribute much. There's a reason he's the 60th pick. He has size, but needs strength, some athleticism and rebounding I stick around
#teamhermes
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
Penberthy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,704
And1: 243
Joined: Jul 06, 2010

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#16 » by Penberthy » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:48 pm

Gek wrote:
Penberthy wrote:
hermes wrote:he's the last pick in the draft, does he had a realistic shot at making the team?


Ginobili 57
clearly everything about this pick makes it comparable to Ginobili.


@hermes: depends on why trades happen and whether or not we resign hill. I can't imagine he'll contribute much. There's a reason he's the 60th pick. He has size, but needs strength, some athleticism and rebounding I stick around


Marc Gasol 48
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#17 » by Jetset » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:54 pm

Robert Sacre 60

as in the last pick of the draft, as in mr. irrelevant, as in absolutely nobody wanted him, as in teams had the opportunity to pick twice and sometimes three or four times and still didn't want him, as in he wont amount to absolutely anything.
Penberthy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,704
And1: 243
Joined: Jul 06, 2010

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#18 » by Penberthy » Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:04 pm

destro wrote:Robert Sacre 60

as in the last pick of the draft, as in mr. irrelevant, as in absolutely nobody wanted him, as in teams had the opportunity to pick twice and sometimes three or four times and still didn't want him, as in he wont amount to absolutely anything.


You mean like the 5'9'', February and March 2012 Rookie of the Month, Starter-as-a-rookie, 2011 60th pick Isaiah Thomas?
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#19 » by Jetset » Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:15 pm

Oh please, your chances are higher of finding a guard that may be a steal than it is to find a big, let alone a center. Every GMs salivate at the chance of having a big with some potential, the only reason Isaiah Thomas wasn't selected earlier is because he was viewed as just another massively undersized guard. He would've been picked higher had he been about 5-7 inches taller.

And as far as your other examples go both Manu and Marc are international players, there isn't as much opportunity to see them play and fully evaluate them as it is to see and evaluate a player that's playing in the NCAA. And we still don't know if they would've gone undrafted, there were still picks to be had behind them. This guy of course would've gone undrafted had we not picked him.
Penberthy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,704
And1: 243
Joined: Jul 06, 2010

Re: Spotlight: 60th pick, Robert Sacre 

Post#20 » by Penberthy » Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:30 pm

destro wrote:
Penberthy wrote:
destro wrote:Robert Sacre 60

as in the last pick of the draft, as in mr. irrelevant, as in absolutely nobody wanted him, as in teams had the opportunity to pick twice and sometimes three or four times and still didn't want him, as in he wont amount to absolutely anything.


You mean like the 5'9'', February and March 2012 Rookie of the Month, Starter-as-a-rookie, 2011 60th pick Isaiah Thomas?


Oh please, your chances are higher find a guard that may be a steal than it is to find a big, let alone a center. Every GMs salivate at the chance of having a big with some potential, the only reason Isaiah Thomas wasn't selected earlier is because he was viewed as just another massively undersized guard. He would've been picked higher had he been about 5-7 inches taller.

And as far as your other examples go both Manu and Marc are international players, there isn't as much opportunity to see them play and fully evaluate them as it is to see and evaluate a player that's playing in the NCAA. And we still don't know if they would've gone undrafted, there were still picks to be had behind them. This guy of course would've gone undrafted had we not picked him.


I was only half trolling when I first mentioned Ginobili. But the confidence with with you belittle others, and the absolute certainty you pretend to have that just because he was drafted at 60 you are absolutely 100% he will amount to nothing, even in the face of countless examples of UNDRAFTED AMERICANS that have gone on to have successful decade-long NBA careers prompted me to continue the dialogue. I concede, the odds are long, but again, its your overconfidence in your own opinion that bugs me. I also find it comical that you say it is easier or more likely for a PG to succeed in the NBA than a C.

Off the top of the head, undrafted:
Brad Miller
Ben Wallace
John Starks
Raja Bell
Udonis Haslem
Avery Johnson
Bruce Bowen
Carlos Arroyo
Reggie Evans
Chuck Hayes
Jannero Pargo

Return to Los Angeles Lakers