Page 1 of 1
Why wouldn't we want Jason Richardson?
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:03 pm
by nbaintel1
In a Dwight trade? He's still balling.
Just a year ago, he averaged 19 points in only 30 minutes playing with Nash. Shot 42% on 3s too.
He can return to that kind of production with Nash and the Lakers in my opinion.
Come on Buss, pay the tax.
Re: Why wouldn't we want Jason Richardson?
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:11 pm
by Sofa King
I don't think taking Jason Richardson is a problem. Most likely more to the deal and negotiations.
Re: Why wouldn't we want Jason Richardson?
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:28 pm
by Stebo_SSK
Orlando is just dragging everyone through the mud, as they should. D12 is a top 5 player, they should try to push everyone to the limit to see what they can get.
Re: Why wouldn't we want Jason Richardson?
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:42 pm
by Kilroy
I read somewhere that it's because he f****d Nash and they had an Asian baby...
Jay McLaed reported it.
Re: Why wouldn't we want Jason Richardson?
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:05 pm
by Desiderium
it's probably got more to do with Dwight's unwillingness to resign in LA than jason richardson's contract. i hope a deal gets done today, i'm so tired of these rumors.
Re: Why wouldn't we want Jason Richardson?
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:41 pm
by AdonisDeMarion
I would love Richardson here, as for Howard I'm over him all together now. He would do well here with Bryant, Gasol, Nash and Richardson but let him rot in Orlando.
Re: Why wouldn't we want Jason Richardson?
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 4:09 am
by Mamba Venom
We need a scorer off the bench.
There are only 2 seasons left to go all in. Then the penalties quadruple. Might as well spend it while Jerry Buss is alive to enjoy it.
Re: Why wouldn't we want Jason Richardson?
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 4:18 am
by OOO
nbaintel1 wrote:In a Dwight trade? He's still balling.
Just a year ago, he averaged 19 points in only 30 minutes playing with Nash. Shot 42% on 3s too.
He can return to that kind of production with Nash and the Lakers in my opinion.
Come on Buss, pay the tax.
Easy for you to say, it's not your money.
Re: Why wouldn't we want Jason Richardson?
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 4:35 am
by Dr Aki
because dan fegan
Re: Why wouldn't we want Jason Richardson?
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:02 am
by 77CSUN77
Lakers decided to take him
Re: Why wouldn't we want Jason Richardson?
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:22 am
by EArl
cuz he banged Nash's wife?
Re: Why wouldn't we want Jason Richardson?
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:46 am
by nbaintel1
OOO wrote:nbaintel1 wrote:In a Dwight trade? He's still balling.
Just a year ago, he averaged 19 points in only 30 minutes playing with Nash. Shot 42% on 3s too.
He can return to that kind of production with Nash and the Lakers in my opinion.
Come on Buss, pay the tax.
Easy for you to say, it's not your money.
It's our money. We watch games on TV which advertisers pay for commercials. We pay for tickets. We pay for merchandise.
The Lakers have made plenty of money off of me and you.
Re: Why wouldn't we want Jason Richardson?
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:47 am
by magic wand time
Wasn't that Leo, not JRich?
As for the OP, yes. With Kobe and Ron, JRich would be wing b/u for 30 mpg, 6th moty candidate imo.
Re: Why wouldn't we want Jason Richardson?
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:53 pm
by Mr 24 eight
We would. We're not signing his checks.
Re: Why wouldn't we want Jason Richardson?
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:42 pm
by Stebo_SSK
nbaintel1 wrote:OOO wrote:nbaintel1 wrote:In a Dwight trade? He's still balling.
Just a year ago, he averaged 19 points in only 30 minutes playing with Nash. Shot 42% on 3s too.
He can return to that kind of production with Nash and the Lakers in my opinion.
Come on Buss, pay the tax.
Easy for you to say, it's not your money.
It's our money. We watch games on TV which advertisers pay for commercials. We pay for tickets. We pay for merchandise.
The Lakers have made plenty of money off of me and you.
You sound stupid, its not ur money. You have the right to not support them just as much as you choose to support them.