ImageImageImageImageImage

upside to missing the POs and no 2013 pick

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,691
And1: 31,935
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

upside to missing the POs and no 2013 pick 

Post#1 » by Dr Aki » Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:39 am

this thread is meant to be light hearted take on this absurd absurd season. up is down, black is white, the mark jackson coached warriors are actually good, the clips are a true contender and the lakers are fighting (a losing battle) for that 8th seed despite having 4-6 HOFers (jamison, MWP could get in right?). everything that could've gone wrong, has gone wrong

to those of you who like me, have probably written the season off (i mean seriously, the average # of wins for an 8th seed in the west of recent years past is like 48 wins, we ain't getting there) i have good news.

we don't have our 2013 pick, if its lottery, it goes to the suns, if its non-lottery, it goes to the cavs, obviously that's not good news, but guess what?

the 2013 draft is going to be terribad, like historically bad, 2000 kmart/stromile swift/darius miles is the #1/#2/#3 picks bad

so all-in-all, even if we don't make the POs and phoenix has our lottery pick, they're not going to get better by much anytime soon. and we still have a 39-40 yo steve nash to show for it

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2HBdRCroks[/youtube]
Image
User avatar
Mamba Venom
RealGM
Posts: 17,979
And1: 582
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: California
Contact:

Re: upside to missing the POs and no 2013 pick 

Post#2 » by Mamba Venom » Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:08 am

This draft is not going to be bad. It actually will have some real solid players. There just ins't a Durant or Dwight in the draft.
Lakers are 22-3 in OT last 6 seasons:Kobe best OT closer!
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,691
And1: 31,935
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: upside to missing the POs and no 2013 pick 

Post#3 » by Dr Aki » Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:17 am

i dunno, only a couple that are starter material, couple that are role player material and the rest are gambles. and thats if they develop the right way

sounds terribad to me
Image
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,470
And1: 25,502
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: upside to missing the POs and no 2013 pick 

Post#4 » by hermes » Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:35 am

oh great you know the future!

i'd like to know the winning lottery numbers to a pretty large jackpot, some great stock picks for the next ten-twenty years, when the cubs are going to win another world series, and when we'll get flying cars


thanks
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: upside to missing the POs and no 2013 pick 

Post#5 » by Jetset » Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:43 am

Mamba Venom wrote:This draft is not going to be bad. It actually will have some real solid players. There just ins't a Durant or Dwight in the draft.


nah, this will probably the worst draft in quite a while. no player is the clear cut consensus #1 pick, and that's not because there are multiples of great players to choose from. noel isn't the difference maker that i'm sure kentucky envisioned, kentucky's not even ranked anymore as a matter of act. cody zeller has cost himself millions by not declaring last year, instead he came back and has been exposed. shabazz has had some "okay" games at ucla but he hasn't looked nearly as dominant as he did in high school, he just hasn't transitioned to the college game that well at all. so no, this draft is going to be pretty bad. if any good is to come from it, it'll have to be a diamond in the rough type deal.

but even still, can't really be happy with this because we're not even supposed to be in this position. it's like coming in second place to someone who didn't even try and didn't know there was a race to begin with.
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,691
And1: 31,935
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: upside to missing the POs and no 2013 pick 

Post#6 » by Dr Aki » Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:41 am

lol, what im saying is, if there's a good time to miss the POs and not have a lottery pick.

2013 is a great time to do it
Image
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: upside to missing the POs and no 2013 pick 

Post#7 » by DEEP3CL » Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:45 am

To anybody saying this draft isn't going to be bad. ....uhh yeah it is. There is no one I mean no one that's going to have a major impact on a team. It's full of role players but not stars. That's why I roll off these board's tracking the Lakers, you think the Lakers gave a damn about those picks? Hell no lurkers
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: upside to missing the POs and no 2013 pick 

Post#8 » by Jetset » Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:19 am

DEEP3CL wrote:To anybody saying this draft isn't going to be bad. ....uhh yeah it is. There is no one I mean no one that's going to have a major impact on a team. It's full of role players but not stars. That's why I roll off these board's tracking the Lakers, you think the Lakers gave a damn about those picks? Hell no lurkers


apparently they didn't because we can't trade another one until possibly 2021.
showtimePL
Ballboy
Posts: 34
And1: 8
Joined: Jun 08, 2012

Re: upside to missing the POs and no 2013 pick 

Post#9 » by showtimePL » Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:58 pm

Draft is very weak this year, but we pick in mid 2nd round and this is our chance to get some solid role player.
laduane1
Banned User
Posts: 2,216
And1: 29
Joined: Jul 04, 2008

Re: upside to missing the POs and no 2013 pick 

Post#10 » by laduane1 » Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:41 pm

Lakers could have used there pick to flip it later for a player they could have used in this new system. Just because some experts say there is not a good player in the draft, does not mean all are crap.
LApwnd
Banned User
Posts: 20,606
And1: 1,146
Joined: Jul 09, 2008

Re: upside to missing the POs and no 2013 pick 

Post#11 » by LApwnd » Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:20 pm

destro wrote:
DEEP3CL wrote:To anybody saying this draft isn't going to be bad. ....uhh yeah it is. There is no one I mean no one that's going to have a major impact on a team. It's full of role players but not stars. That's why I roll off these board's tracking the Lakers, you think the Lakers gave a damn about those picks? Hell no lurkers


apparently they didn't because we can't trade another one until possibly 2021.


they haven't traded 2014 and 2016 yet :lol: , once 2013 draft is done 2014 will be available same thing with 2016, once 2015 done
ROballer
General Manager
Posts: 9,703
And1: 2,964
Joined: Sep 06, 2009
Location: Romania
   

Re: upside to missing the POs and no 2013 pick 

Post#12 » by ROballer » Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:24 pm

After what happened this year,I hope Mitch puts at least a goddamn protection on future pick if he wants to trade em' :lol: :lol:
Steve Nash injures his back while carrying bags

Slava wrote:I pulled a hammy while fapping. I won't make fun of Nash.
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: upside to missing the POs and no 2013 pick 

Post#13 » by Jetset » Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:55 pm

LApwnd wrote:
destro wrote:
DEEP3CL wrote:To anybody saying this draft isn't going to be bad. ....uhh yeah it is. There is no one I mean no one that's going to have a major impact on a team. It's full of role players but not stars. That's why I roll off these board's tracking the Lakers, you think the Lakers gave a damn about those picks? Hell no lurkers


apparently they didn't because we can't trade another one until possibly 2021.


they haven't traded 2014 and 2016 yet :lol: , once 2013 draft is done 2014 will be available same thing with 2016, once 2015 done


yeh. even still we only own 3 picks in the next 6 years and there's a chance we might not even own the 2019 pick depending on the protections of the 2015 and 2017 picks.
LApwnd
Banned User
Posts: 20,606
And1: 1,146
Joined: Jul 09, 2008

Re: upside to missing the POs and no 2013 pick 

Post#14 » by LApwnd » Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:57 pm

I've grown accustomed to not being excited bout the draft anymore, we never have any 1st rd picks :lol: only time we'll ever keep em is if its a lottery pick.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers