Page 1 of 1
McGrady
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:43 am
by supaflash
Just a thought but he's looked pretty good in China, and he's a guy that could potentially do the Kobe role for a few mins when he's on the bench, allowing us to continue to build this type of system for the rest of the year. Takers? Yay/Nay? I also didn't look that bad last year in limited minutes.
Re: McGrady
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2013 1:16 am
by Goochmeister
Only if he's willing to accept the vets min. I mean he can't be as bad lets say a duhon or ebanks.... Can he? :shock:
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
Re: McGrady
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2013 1:46 am
by RamonSessions7
No real point. He's not making any kind of difference anywhere in the NBA
Re: McGrady
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2013 3:04 am
by gotokyo
We should get him and AI. Not because its any type of upgrade but because I want to believe its 2003 and have the best team ever assembled.
Re: McGrady
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2013 3:17 am
by chefy
gotokyo wrote:We should get him and AI. Not because its any type of upgrade but because I want to believe its 2003 and have the best team ever assembled.
i miss the 90s.
i cant believe vc is having a longer career than tmac.
Re: McGrady
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2013 3:38 am
by minifang
The rotation and everyone's roles on the team are starting to set into place. No point messing that up now.
Re: McGrady
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2013 4:22 am
by hermes
a thousand times nay
Re: McGrady
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2013 5:50 am
by winwinz
chefy wrote:gotokyo wrote:We should get him and AI. Not because its any type of upgrade but because I want to believe its 2003 and have the best team ever assembled.
i miss the 90s.
i cant believe vc is having a longer career than tmac.
Because VC accepts his new role.
tmac still think its 2003
Re: McGrady
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2013 5:57 am
by Jakay
Now VC vs Jamison, there's one to watch unfold. Teammates traded for each other on draft day, still both decent players (not great, but they're in the league for a reason still). Who outlasts who?
Juwan Howard put the Fab 5 to shame.
Re: McGrady
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2013 11:09 am
by Minime83
I'd take an old Iverson/Mcgrady over a young Duhon/Morris/blake anyday... <<< not like they do anything.
Drop - Duhon/Morris/Blake for Iverson/Mcgrady
Do it mitch, do it lol.
Re: McGrady
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2013 7:15 pm
by allstar124
winwinz wrote:chefy wrote:gotokyo wrote:We should get him and AI. Not because its any type of upgrade but because I want to believe its 2003 and have the best team ever assembled.
i miss the 90s.
i cant believe vc is having a longer career than tmac.
Because VC accepts his new role.
tmac still think its 2003
I do not blame you for thinking this considering you have probably not watch T-Mac play for several years, but watching him the last two years, you would realize he has evolved his game. He was a great help for the Hawks last year, and played great at the Point Guard spot in Detroit.
T-Mac is certainly gaining confidence in China, and probably has put in more work on that injured knee in 20 games in China than he has in the past 2 years in the NBA.
Re: McGrady
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2013 7:15 pm
by allstar124
Goochmeister wrote:Only if he's willing to accept the vets min. I mean he can't be as bad lets say a duhon or ebanks.... Can he? :shock:
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
The past two NBA contracts he has had were Vet Mins.
Re: McGrady
Posted: Fri Feb 1, 2013 7:19 pm
by supaflash
I know. I would prefer a more athletic younger player but there just aren't many options and I think he could thrive in this situation. His time in China has shown he's got some conditioning and health back and the guy is so talented. He's always been a great passer and creator, another of which this team could really use. Our bench just needs a guy that is capable of creating something and not afraid to. I just think this situation where he can play limited minutes surrounded by lots of talent would be great for him. Not like we have a whole lot to lose at this point.
Re: McGrady
Posted: Sat Feb 2, 2013 10:27 am
by doozyj
He's in China for a reason, he's no longer good enough for the NBA.
Re: McGrady
Posted: Sat Feb 2, 2013 8:54 pm
by Mamba Venom
gotokyo wrote:We should get him and AI. Not because its any type of upgrade but because I want to believe its 2003 and have the best team ever assembled.
See 2011 Celtics then LOL
Also who is this Dwight Howard guy?
Re: McGrady
Posted: Mon Feb 4, 2013 4:40 pm
by AdonisDeMarion
Nash/Bryant/MWP/Clark/Howard
Blake/Meeks/McGrady/Jamison/Gasol
I love it
Re: McGrady
Posted: Thu Feb 7, 2013 3:57 pm
by langer
doozyj wrote:He's in China for a reason, he's no longer good enough for the NBA.
not really, he got way more money in China, like way more. Thanks Yao!
Re: McGrady
Posted: Thu Feb 7, 2013 4:12 pm
by Jetset
langer wrote:doozyj wrote:He's in China for a reason, he's no longer good enough for the NBA.
not really, he got way more money in China, like way more. Thanks Yao!
Chinese media reports say the contract is worth at least $1 million.
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/84856 ... -thank-nba
Re: McGrady
Posted: Thu Feb 7, 2013 4:51 pm
by LApwnd
yep Tmac like Arenas is in China for a reason and it aint money.
Re: McGrady
Posted: Fri Feb 8, 2013 8:31 am
by laduane1
The best day for the Lakers is when the trade deadline is passed and they can stop thinking about all this crap and focus on winning some games.