Page 1 of 2
Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 4:51 am
by moonpie
[tweet]https://twitter.com/mcten/status/351562244481499136[/tweet]
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 4:51 am
by Slava
Can we get Sessions back?
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 4:55 am
by kblo247
I rather Farmar to Sessions. Better athleticism, cheaper cost, and more balls. Sessions was a pussy to be blunt in the playoffs both rounds
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 4:57 am
by dockingsched
SlavaMedvedenko wrote:Can we get Sessions back?
i wish
anyway with farmar i just don't see a fit. he's not going to want to split minutes with nash and blake, and the lakers need to use the mmle on a different position. jsut don't see the stars aligning for his return.
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:00 am
by kblo247
Dantoni is the coach and he has a hard on for the Steves playing together. Farmar based on last year would have a legit shot at beating both out based on talent, athletic ability, and that he's a change of pace from them. Neither of them can get anywhere without a pick, Farmar can at least penetrate and he's not afraid of LA lights
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:03 am
by crazyeights
dockingsched wrote:SlavaMedvedenko wrote:Can we get Sessions back?
i wish
anyway with farmar i just don't see a fit. he's not going to want to split minutes with nash and blake, and the lakers need to use the mmle on a different position. jsut don't see the stars aligning for his return.
Perhaps an indication we're gonna rotate Kobe to the 3/Blake may play some 2?
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:03 am
by Slava
I was one of Sessions' biggest critics during that playoff choke fest but you really need to lose a player like that to realize his importance. Even last season, he had like the highest FG conversion % in the paint amongst guards. I'd welcome him with open arms.
Given Charlotte's big man situation, I wouldn't mind dangling Jordan Hill, Meeks and a pick for Sessions.
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:04 am
by LaLa
Are we getting the 2010 bench back together? Bring back LO and Luke too!
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:10 am
by Ckay
what about Sun Yue? lol
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:11 am
by DEEP3CL
I'd Jordan has matured then I'm down. ..if not keep stepping
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:12 am
by KB24TBOTB
Im glad that the lakers are at least active

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:14 am
by Slava
Ckay wrote:what about Sun Yue? lol
The yellow mamba
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:18 am
by kblo247
SlavaMedvedenko wrote:I was one of Sessions' biggest critics during that playoff choke fest but you really need to lose a player like that to realize his importance. Even last season, he had like the highest FG conversion % in the paint amongst guards. I'd welcome him with open arms.
Given Charlotte's big man situation, I wouldn't mind dangling Jordan Hill, Meeks and a pick for Sessions.
Hill and Meeks okay, but giving up another pick for sessions to be a free agent and leave us again after a season is like a bad remix.
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:20 am
by Kalidogg24
Jordan Farmar , Game 6 , 2010 NBA Finals one handed tomahawk dunk on KG
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:21 am
by Kobe System
SlavaMedvedenko wrote:Ckay wrote:what about Sun Yue? lol
The yellow mamba
What about --

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:34 am
by dAdo dA dEvil
yeah i say let's bring DJ back plus sasha and josh powell ... and maybe adam morrison too ... ^_^
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:39 am
by TyCobb
Lets get Chris Mihm to back up Sacre at center.
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 5:41 am
by NOODLESTYLE
Ckay wrote:what about Sun Yue? lol
Adam Morrison and Sasha Vujacic say hello

Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 6:11 am
by TruSkool
the only 2 formers we need are trevor ariza and lamar odom. those 2 players will bring the lakers back to their position
Re: Lakers and Farmar have "mutual interest"
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 6:24 am
by what would jack bauer do?
Farmar can actually shoot the 3ball and is a better defender than sessions. I couldn't believe Sessions was a worse defender than Blake when we had him. Sessions just has no explosion laterally and can't fight through screens, it's probably why he'll always be a back up.
My defensive rankings for the recent relevant Lakers pg's:
Fisher > Farmar > Blake > Sessions
Dockingsched I think we can make things line up right. Mitch just needs to do work. Maybe Blake's expiring for Courtney lee. Or Jordan Hill for C. lee and a first round pick. Boston has zero depth up front and Hill is very serviceable.