They don't have SA in first?! They got the premier free agent, lost no one good, and literally got David West for nothing because they're good! The Clippers didn't lose their big FA, and got Skita, and a mummy who will hit one huge shot all year, and not much else.
I'm sorry, but that list sucks. Also it's missing Bass.
Also also I rate the Lakers offseason a W.
Lakers ranked 10th for offseason transactions?
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
Re: Lakers ranked 10th for offseason transactions?
-
Jakay
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 29,770
- And1: 6,226
- Joined: Jan 27, 2003
- Location: Half out of my mind
- Contact:
Re: Lakers ranked 10th for offseason transactions?
-
Kilroy
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 21,603
- And1: 12,316
- Joined: Jul 10, 2006
- Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
-
Re: Lakers ranked 10th for offseason transactions?
I'm tired of subjective evaluations being passed off as substantive proof and news... Work harder.
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...