Page 1 of 1
Pacific Division Offseason Review
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 12:02 am
by Smitty731
Hey Guys!
My Pacific Division Offseason Recap is up for RealGM, complete with grades for this offseason and each team's long term outlook.
http://basketball.realgm.com/analysis/243330/2016-NBA-Offseason-Review-Pacific-DivisionAny and all feedback is always appreciated.
Thanks!
Smitty
Re: Pacific Division Offseason Review
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 12:26 am
by dockingsched
to be frank it's laughable that the Suns have a long term grade of B+ and the kings have a B- and the lakers are at a C.
Re: Pacific Division Offseason Review
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 1:27 am
by Michael Lucky
Yeah the contracts hinder more short term flexibility than any long term ones. By the time Ingram and Russell are up for contract renewals and they are good enough to help us be competitive, the contracts will be off the books anyways. Besides paying the luxury tax to resign your own players isn't as big an issue for the organization as it is for other teams.
Re: Pacific Division Offseason Review
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 2:56 am
by Danny Darko
Kings do not have a bright future imo..
Suns have really just 1 bright spot and no real FA appeal...
The Lakers have more potential talent overall with development, max cap space next year, and if they show promise and culture under Walton they are definitely far better long term than both of those teams.
Re: Pacific Division Offseason Review
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 3:15 am
by ArC_man
Danny Darko wrote:Kings do not have a bright future imo..
Suns have really just 1 bright spot and no real FA appeal...
The Lakers have more potential talent overall with development, max cap space next year, and if they show promise and culture under Walton they are definitely far better long term than both of those teams.
Explosions are bright