Page 1 of 2

OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 4:07 am
by dockingsched
Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:53 am
by TyCobb
Booooooo! Hate it!

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:47 am
by stan francisco
I've always thought the Clippers should move to Vegas. The Las Vegas Clippers would make more sense than LAC.

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:05 pm
by Slava
stan francisco wrote:I've always thought the Clippers should move to Vegas. The Las Vegas Clippers would make more sense than LAC.


I always felt Vegas is more Laker centric than even LA.

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 4:50 pm
by Crooked-I
So 2 teams are going to play in that crappy Coliseum next year lol. Oh and it's Rams all day.

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 5:18 pm
by dockingsched
Crooked-I wrote:So 2 teams are going to play in that crappy Coliseum next year lol. Oh and it's Rams all day.

Chargers are going to play at the stub hub center believe it or not

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:22 pm
by xBlackMamba
New logo looks way to similar to the Dodgers logo for my liking

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:26 pm
by BEazy
Go Pack Go! :D

But if I had to choose, probably Rams.

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:22 pm
by snaquille oatmeal
My two cents- the Chargers are originally from LA so welcome home bolts

Ok one more cent, two football teams in the negative don't make a positive or does it?

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:24 pm
by snaquille oatmeal
Now if we can get the dodgers and the angels playing in the same stadium and the Kings and Ducks....ok I'm tired now nappy time

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:50 pm
by Crooked-I
dockingsched wrote:
Crooked-I wrote:So 2 teams are going to play in that crappy Coliseum next year lol. Oh and it's Rams all day.

Chargers are going to play at the stub hub center believe it or not


LOL what the hell ive been there for a galaxy game, theres like 25k capacity way too small for a football stadium.

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:37 pm
by Michael Lucky
I lived in San Diego for four years, so this is an easy choice for me. Doesn't help either that the Rams are flat out awful to watch. With a couple of decent roster moves the chargers could get into the playoffs, i don't even see that possibility for the Rams.

Never cared for the Raiders. I didn't move to the US until 1999, so i have no affiliation to them whatsoever. They also only spent 12 years as an LA team when they were originally from Oakland to begin with. Having said that, if all you care about is winning, then they project much better with their young talent than either the Rams or Chargers.

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 1:18 am
by stan francisco
Slava wrote:
stan francisco wrote:I've always thought the Clippers should move to Vegas. The Las Vegas Clippers would make more sense than LAC.


I always felt Vegas is more Laker centric than even LA.


You must not live in LA. Vegas loves the Lakers, though.

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:20 am
by Spens1
Ok as an Aussie. Why do american owners have such a laise-faire response to moving teams, and why do people feel that you should support that said team after they've basically betrayed you and that city (see St Louis moving to L.A, for some reason L.A fans were basically demanding St Louis fans support the rams even though most of the St Louis people were having none of it).

Now i know they kind of rejected the stadium, but the owner just seems like complete garbage anyway, moving away from San Diego who rejected this to a city where they haven't had an NFL for a while, now they're going to get 2. Plus from what i understand, San Diego has the least history by far out of the Rams, Raiders and them. Oh and they're playing out of a 30k seat stadium. And they're going to lose their QB because of this (probably not the biggest deal but still not a good way to start).

I mean obviously i follow the lakers, hardly a local team i suppose, but an example was when the local NBL team here folded, didn't want anything to do with the league really and only started getting back in once the team came back (8 years later).

Does seemingly clear the way for a San Diego MLS team though i'd think (if not an NBA team, no town deserves just the padres as their only major pro team).

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:56 am
by MAMBAEMD
I feel bad for the San Diego Charger fans.
The Chargers will have a marketing war with the Rams, but I think the fans will gravitate toward whichever teams that is winning.

BTW, the Clips should move the hell to San Diego.

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:15 am
by Wavy Q
horrible, this city might be 5th or 6th on the list of football fans in LA.

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:22 pm
by Ballerhogger
TyCobb wrote:Booooooo! Hate it!

Really how come?

2 LA teams is back lol I don't mind it maybe chargers can get back to winning.

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:24 pm
by Ballerhogger
Wavy Q wrote:horrible, this city might be 5th or 6th on the list of football fans in LA.

USC is going be good to great next year there will be hype if chargers can be any good.

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:25 pm
by Ballerhogger
lakerRD wrote:I feel bad for the San Diego Charger fans.
The Chargers will have a marketing war with the Rams, but I think the fans will gravitate toward whichever teams that is winning.

BTW, the Clips should move the hell to San Diego.

Who ever is the better team is going win the marketing war by year 2. They play in two different stadiums as for now

Re: OT: Los Angeles Chargers

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:27 pm
by Ballerhogger
Slava wrote:
stan francisco wrote:I've always thought the Clippers should move to Vegas. The Las Vegas Clippers would make more sense than LAC.


I always felt Vegas is more Laker centric than even LA.

It all really depends what kind of team we have. A young team like now wouldn't be fan favorite in Vegas.