RealGM

I read a lot around here about how we need to dump Deng.

While I do think his contract is too big. I don't feel like he is as bad as Mozgov was. Deng is a former All-Defensive team and 2x All-Star. This guy has things to teach to our young guys. He's a winner and has played huge minutes in his career. I think that the shut down from last season will do him a lot of good.

He has asked to play more 4 next year and I can see him playing in lineups where Randle or Nance play 5. I think he will be a really good player off our bench this year and with Clarkson maybe starting at 2 I think he's our 6th man.

I do understand that 18 millions for a role player off our bench is ridiculous but we are not in a win now situation and I believe Deng can bring a lot to this team. He was an absolute pro last year when we asked him to step aside and will be an absolute pro this year when we ask him to play significant minutes off the bench.

Best case scenario : Deng plays close to the level he was playing 4 at Miami and gets easier to move when we do need to move him.

Nah, Deng is done. We had to "develop" him last year, when we needed him to be a vet and get things going right away.

I don't want him stealing any minutes from our young guys. If we can't dump him before the 2018 off-season, he's going to get stretched

The best case scenario for Deng now is as a successor to MWP's role last year but his salary will be too big for that. Find a way to trade him. After seeing DLo + Moz I think it will take Randle to unload Deng.

Just buyout this scrub and let's develop the kids.

hazy_01 wrote:I don't want him stealing any minutes from our young guys. If we can't dump him before the 2018 off-season, he's going to get stretched

I don't see him stealing minutes from anybody. I see him playing valuable minutes on the bench.

As far as I am concerned as much as this year is about development I believe Magic wants to create a winning culture in L.A. We don't have any pick next year. Winning is good for everybody around the team and is especially good if you are trying to attract FA next year.

I do not think Deng is done. I believe he had an off year, had multiple injuries. He will bounce back. Will never be The Bulls Deng but eh.

I like Deng as a Role player and Mentor. I do not want him to play 30 minutes either but I feel like he can give you a good 20 minutes of solid bball.

Spanish_Laker wrote:Just buyout this scrub and let's develop the kids.

As long as we don't trade Ingram and Deng for (insert random expensive vet on expiring deal here) to get rid of him, I'm fine with trading him away.

Still trying to figure out what Mitch was thinking signing Deng to that contract.

I'm perfectly fine with trading Randle alongside Deng, even for a bag of potato chips at this point....if it means geting rid of that albatross of a contract and positioning ourselvez better for the summer of 2018.

We wouldn't miss a single beat. In no shape of form, Randle is instrumental on where we are and will be.
The team will still win and lose about the same with or without him.

Spanish_Laker wrote:Just buyout this scrub and let's develop the kids.

I agree. If we don't get a Paul George trade before the season (which includes Randle or Nance) then cut the cord, stretch him, and move on. Our PF and C depth is currently out of control.

PF: Randle/ Nance/ Kuzma/ Deng
C: Lopez/ Zubac/ Black/ Bryant

He needs to go ASAP, and PG needs to come here ASAP.

Its starting to look a lot like Julius Randle isn't in the Lakers future plans, so packaging him as another salary dump probably makes the most sense if any rebuilding team is willing to bite on that package.

He can be a 6th man on another team

Pointgod wrote:He can be a 6th man on another team

That is the whole point of the exercise.

I am on the same boat as everybody. I would love to get rid of his big contract.

Only thing is I see some value in him and if we can expose this to other team it is only gonna benefit everybody.

KidDynamit wrote:

Pointgod wrote:He can be a 6th man on another team

That is the whole point of the exercise.

I am on the same boat as everybody. I would love to get rid of his big contract.

Only thing is I see some value in him and if we can expose this to other team it is only gonna benefit everybody.

Deng is trash and every team knows it. If we get rid of him we'll have to sacrifice assets just like we did with Mozgov. There seems really no way any team trading for him will do it for any sort of talent.

Pointgod wrote:

KidDynamit wrote:

Pointgod wrote:He can be a 6th man on another team

That is the whole point of the exercise.

I am on the same boat as everybody. I would love to get rid of his big contract.

Only thing is I see some value in him and if we can expose this to other team it is only gonna benefit everybody.

Deng is trash and every team knows it. If we get rid of him we'll have to sacrifice assets just like we did with Mozgov. There seems really no way any team trading for him will do it for any sort of talent.

Deng was seen as one of the best two way player in the league 3 years ago. Mozgov never accomplished anything at any point in his career.

Also I do not think people will pay to get Deng. I believe we might have to give less to get rid of him.

Deng is a starting PF if he is anything. I hope Ball does enough to boost his value that he catches the eye of some misguided team to think they are buying low.

We will most likely trade Randle anyways, we can't conserve space for two max deals and still afford to play him. Nance is too unreliable healthwise, Kuzma is too young so the starting PF is up for grabs.

He better be coming off the bench. If Luke starts Deng over Ingram like at the beginning of the season i'm gonna flip out.

Slava wrote:Deng is a starting PF if he is anything. I hope Ball does enough to boost his value that he catches the eye of some misguided team to think they are buying low.

We will most likely trade Randle anyways, we can't conserve space for two max deals and still afford to play him. Nance is too unreliable healthwise, Kuzma is too young so the starting PF is up for grabs.

Lopez and Deng would be the worst rebounding front court in the league. I wouldn't be too happy with those 2 as our starting front court.

Crooked-I wrote:

Slava wrote:Deng is a starting PF if he is anything. I hope Ball does enough to boost his value that he catches the eye of some misguided team to think they are buying low.

We will most likely trade Randle anyways, we can't conserve space for two max deals and still afford to play him. Nance is too unreliable healthwise, Kuzma is too young so the starting PF is up for grabs.

Lopez and Deng would be the worst rebounding front court in the league. I wouldn't be too happy with those 2 as our starting front court.

Rebounding is going to be an issue but with Ingram and Ball being strong rebounders we might be able to get away with it.

Slava wrote:Deng is a starting PF if he is anything. I hope Ball does enough to boost his value that he catches the eye of some misguided team to think they are buying low.

We will most likely trade Randle anyways, we can't conserve space for two max deals and still afford to play him. Nance is too unreliable healthwise, Kuzma is too young so the starting PF is up for grabs.

Would love somehow for Minnesota to take deng but I Believe it just isn't possible. (Unless it helps them somehow) but minny is loaded fill on cap now with Rubio/jimmy and Wiggins and Kat coming in a few years