ImageImageImageImageImage

? from Bulls' Fan

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,315
And1: 4,253
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#1 » by pipfan » Sun Jul 2, 2017 3:14 pm

Never visited here-I come in peace

I really think the Lakers could draw LBJ and PG13 next year-it would make a lot of sense. But, Lakers need to clear $ to make it happen

Does this trade make sense?
Wade for Deng/Kumaz (I know nothing about him) and a 2021 Laker pick, unprotected?

For the Lakers, Wade is a name player who MIGHT sell a few tickets this year. Much bigger would be his friendship with LBJ-I think he would sign super cheap next year, to bring in his buddy and PG 13.

Next, Lakers would have to move Clarkson-should be possible as a neutral asset. I think the Knicks might take him for free.

Lakers this year end up with
Ball
Wade
Ingrim
Randle
zubic

A bad team, but lots of development time for the young kids. I think George and LBJ would join that team, and then you have a contender, If Ball can play and Ingrim continues to develop?

As for my Bulls, we are on full tank, so Deng comes in as our vet leader. We move RLopez (would the Lakers want him too?) and we add assets to build with.

So, am I far off? Thanks for your attention
User avatar
Yunsta
Ballboy
Posts: 48
And1: 29
Joined: Jul 29, 2012
   

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#2 » by Yunsta » Sun Jul 2, 2017 3:19 pm

There's no way the lakers gonna trade a young piece and a unprotected pick for wades corpse
Kobe System
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 449
Joined: Mar 31, 2010
 

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#3 » by Kobe System » Sun Jul 2, 2017 3:28 pm

I've been preaching this trade from day 1.

Wade for Deng/Clarkson (You can also have Randle and an unprotected first if that would seal the deal).
Kobe System
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 449
Joined: Mar 31, 2010
 

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#4 » by Kobe System » Sun Jul 2, 2017 3:29 pm

Yunsta wrote:There's no way the lakers gonna trade a young piece and a unprotected pick for wades corpse


We are not trading for Wade's corpes. We are trading for Wade's expiring contract.
MAMBAEMD
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,019
And1: 1,693
Joined: May 16, 2007
       

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#5 » by MAMBAEMD » Sun Jul 2, 2017 3:31 pm

I'd do that trade in a heartbeat
Formerly lakerRD
User avatar
dAdo dA dEvil
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,629
And1: 507
Joined: Jun 27, 2013
 

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#6 » by dAdo dA dEvil » Sun Jul 2, 2017 3:37 pm

Why not Deng for Wade straight up?
Maybe add Kuzma / Bryant for RoLo just to make it fun so that the Lopez twins could play together.
And you said you are on full tank mode right now, I think Deng will be a great commander. :D
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,799
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#7 » by Slava » Sun Jul 2, 2017 3:40 pm

Unprotected pick is a bit much. Add top 10 protections and you have a deal.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
BlackieMamba
Sophomore
Posts: 190
And1: 33
Joined: May 17, 2017

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#8 » by BlackieMamba » Sun Jul 2, 2017 3:43 pm

JC & Deng
Hart & Deng
Kuzma & Deng
Bryant & Deng

Any single one of those for Wade is a great deal for the Lakers.
Adding two of the above makes it an ok trade for the Lakers I guess.
Adding one of the above and a draft pick (especially an unprotected one) is a no deal.

I highly doubt that even GarPax would make that deal without a draft pick involved.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,315
And1: 4,253
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#9 » by pipfan » Sun Jul 2, 2017 4:12 pm

I thought I saw something about Magic offering future picks to take Moz/Deng?

I would assume Magic thinks the Lakers will be contending, so a 2021 pick is not a huge concern.

I really like Randle, but we just drafted a PF, and I think Randle works as a 6th man for you next year-even some small ball center?

Is this Kumaz guy any good? I just put him in since the Bulls have NOTHING at SF next year-Deng, Zipser and him can eat the minutes, and fans would love to have Deng back
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 38,250
And1: 9,955
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
     

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#10 » by TyCobb » Sun Jul 2, 2017 4:14 pm

Yes please.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
User avatar
XXBKXX
Senior
Posts: 611
And1: 254
Joined: Nov 11, 2016
     

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#11 » by XXBKXX » Sun Jul 2, 2017 4:17 pm

Lakers do this in a heart beat... Got to protect the pick a bit though... But Lakers would do anything to get out of dengs contract that doesn't involve losing ball or ingram

With that said.. there's no way Chi would..or should... Dengs contract is bad.. like top four worst contracts in NBA bad... Along with Noah Parsons and Moz.. word around LA sports radio is that if Magic/Pelinka are able to get out of BOTH Deng and Moz contract (w/o giving up Ball or Ingram) they should be executive of the year.. that's how had those contracts are.. wishful thinking but no way that happens

Sent from my XT1650 using RealGM mobile app
BK
-----------------------
Lakers / Angels / Dolphins
Landsberger
General Manager
Posts: 9,146
And1: 2,001
Joined: Jul 04, 2016
 

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#12 » by Landsberger » Sun Jul 2, 2017 4:30 pm

Randle and Deng with no pick makes more fiscal sense. I think it's a huge risk to re-sign Randle and since he expires next offseason we may not re-sign him at all if we are trying to sign all of these Stars.... the stars won't come without some other vets so Randle would seem the logical choice to dump in a Deng dung dump.
User avatar
BEazy
RealGM
Posts: 10,101
And1: 2,497
Joined: Aug 06, 2010
     

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#13 » by BEazy » Sun Jul 2, 2017 5:03 pm

Still need to see what my late round 1st picks can do before I add them into any trade scenario. Kuzma is a very intriging piece. He fits the role of a modern stretch 3/4.

I honestly would keep Deng for the season and try to move him next offseason. Deng is younger than Wade, while yes Wade is an expiring, I could see us get something of value if Deng redeems himself this season. Plus keeping Deng knocks one more year off his contract thus making it easier to move him without possibly including Clarkson.

I don't want a 33 year old LBJ in a Lakers uniform anyway. Not even remotely interested in that possbility.
Image

Long Live The Black Mamba. Kobe Bean Bryant Laker For Life. 8/24
User avatar
Mirjalovic
Head Coach
Posts: 7,053
And1: 1,780
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Forza Lazio & LA Lakers !
   

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#14 » by Mirjalovic » Sun Jul 2, 2017 5:21 pm

pipfan wrote:Never visited here-I come in peace

I really think the Lakers could draw LBJ and PG13 next year-it would make a lot of sense. But, Lakers need to clear $ to make it happen

Does this trade make sense?
Wade for Deng/Kumaz (I know nothing about him) and a 2021 Laker pick, unprotected?

For the Lakers, Wade is a name player who MIGHT sell a few tickets this year. Much bigger would be his friendship with LBJ-I think he would sign super cheap next year, to bring in his buddy and PG 13.

Next, Lakers would have to move Clarkson-should be possible as a neutral asset. I think the Knicks might take him for free.

Lakers this year end up with
Ball
Wade
Ingrim
Randle
zubic

A bad team, but lots of development time for the young kids. I think George and LBJ would join that team, and then you have a contender, If Ball can play and Ingrim continues to develop?

As for my Bulls, we are on full tank, so Deng comes in as our vet leader. We move RLopez (would the Lakers want him too?) and we add assets to build with.

So, am I far off? Thanks for your attention


YES

Garpaxdof should hire you.
shawn_hemp wrote: a guy who is far worse than Robert Covington in Brandon Ingram, and a guy who is no better than TJ McConnell or Tony Wroten in D'Angelo Russell.

Sixers fans...

Image
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,315
And1: 4,253
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#15 » by pipfan » Sun Jul 2, 2017 9:22 pm

I thought about making it Deng/Randle for Wade, but with drafting a 4, and having Portis,-just doesn't make sense for us.

Deng's deal doesn't hurt the bulls, and we REALLY need someone to play SF minutes for us-even if we are tanking.

The best I would do is 1 year of top 3 protection-but I really would be against any-it's the cost of taking on such a bad deal
jmak
Ballboy
Posts: 8
And1: 15
Joined: Jul 09, 2008

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#16 » by jmak » Sun Jul 2, 2017 9:36 pm

What about
Wade for Deng, Kuzma, two future 2nd rounders Bulls sent to Lakers in Calderon trade, $5.1million cash
User avatar
JohnVancouver
General Manager
Posts: 9,016
And1: 236
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#17 » by JohnVancouver » Sun Jul 2, 2017 9:43 pm

ScHoolBoy B wrote:Still need to see what my late round 1st picks can do before I add them into any trade scenario. Kuzma is a very intriging piece. He fits the role of a modern stretch 3/4.

I honestly would keep Deng for the season and try to move him next offseason. Deng is younger than Wade, while yes Wade is an expiring, I could see us get something of value if Deng redeems himself this season. Plus keeping Deng knocks one more year off his contract thus making it easier to move him without possibly including Clarkson.

I don't want a 33 year old LBJ in a Lakers uniform anyway. Not even remotely interested in that possbility.


Exactly right - no youngun's bar Clarkson, no picks. Can't afford it - better to stretch or waive him and eat our mistake
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt

"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013

"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
Penberthy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,704
And1: 243
Joined: Jul 06, 2010

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#18 » by Penberthy » Sun Jul 2, 2017 10:24 pm

JohnVancouver wrote:
ScHoolBoy B wrote:Still need to see what my late round 1st picks can do before I add them into any trade scenario. Kuzma is a very intriging piece. He fits the role of a modern stretch 3/4.

I honestly would keep Deng for the season and try to move him next offseason. Deng is younger than Wade, while yes Wade is an expiring, I could see us get something of value if Deng redeems himself this season. Plus keeping Deng knocks one more year off his contract thus making it easier to move him without possibly including Clarkson.

I don't want a 33 year old LBJ in a Lakers uniform anyway. Not even remotely interested in that possbility.


Exactly right - no youngun's bar Clarkson, no picks. Can't afford it - better to stretch or waive him and eat our mistake


How many players in the league are better than a 33 year old LBJ?

What would GS do with Boogie in the wcf, play zaza/mcgee the whole game?

Ball (30) Ring Chaser (18)
Hart (24) Ingram (12) Nwaba (12)
Lebron (30) Ingram (18)
Nance (18) Randle (30)
Boogie (30) Zubac (18) Bryant
Kobeallday
Sophomore
Posts: 150
And1: 35
Joined: Feb 24, 2017
 

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#19 » by Kobeallday » Sun Jul 2, 2017 10:30 pm

pipfan wrote:Never visited here-I come in peace

I really think the Lakers could draw LBJ and PG13 next year-it would make a lot of sense. But, Lakers need to clear $ to make it happen

Does this trade make sense?
Wade for Deng/Kumaz (I know nothing about him) and a 2021 Laker pick, unprotected?

For the Lakers, Wade is a name player who MIGHT sell a few tickets this year. Much bigger would be his friendship with LBJ-I think he would sign super cheap next year, to bring in his buddy and PG 13.

Next, Lakers would have to move Clarkson-should be possible as a neutral asset. I think the Knicks might take him for free.

Lakers this year end up with
Ball
Wade
Ingrim
Randle
zubic

A bad team, but lots of development time for the young kids. I think George and LBJ would join that team, and then you have a contender, If Ball can play and Ingrim continues to develop?

As for my Bulls, we are on full tank, so Deng comes in as our vet leader. We move RLopez (would the Lakers want him too?) and we add assets to build with.

So, am I far off? Thanks for your attention


You are asking for too much, maybe we would do the trade without the future 1st round pick. We probably would offer Deng and clarkson or Deng and Randle for Wade. Because we know you guys are going a different direction and wanna cut Wade, no way we would offer a future 1st plus a rookie that Magic said he really liked for someone we don't need.
User avatar
Beethoven
General Manager
Posts: 7,710
And1: 4,667
Joined: May 03, 2012
Location: Utopian Dystopia
 

Re: ? from Bulls' Fan 

Post#20 » by Beethoven » Sun Jul 2, 2017 11:29 pm

I'd love to have wade for deng and some other items sure. Let's do this. Op you have the contracts to write up? I'll sign them.
Kobe Bryant forever
GO LAKERS
8-)
I've heard it through the grapevine..NBA gods have already designated Los Angeles LAKERS as NBA Champions in near future. The destiny is real. TRUST ME.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers