RealGM

Ibtl

I predict at least 40% of this thread will be about Sixers injuries

Well they have the worst luck with their draft picks when it comes to health. Seriously though, issues with your shooting shoulder at the point where you can't lift your arm up is quite concerning. The idea that he is only going to miss three games is ridiculous. He's had this injury all camp, he clearly needs surgery.

Michael Lucky wrote:Well they have the worst luck with their draft picks when it comes to health. Seriously though, issues with your shooting shoulder at the point where you can't lift your arm up is quite concerning. The idea that he is only going to miss three games is ridiculous. He's had this injury all camp, he clearly needs surgery.

Right... But it's weird they're saying they don't know how to fix it at the moment... Like surgery won't fix it... Why would they say that if it wasn't true? Does he need to play a certain number of games to get paid or something?
I mean if they tried to hide the need for surgery so they could trade him, wouldn't that just come out in the physical anyway?

Could they want to trade him but he doesn't want to be traded? Or is this just an Org trying to save face...

It's all really weird to me.

They really should just shelf Fultz until that shoulder gets right

Dr Aki wrote:They really should just shelf Fultz until that shoulder gets right

They should just admit they have a non-G-League red shirt program

Siimbiid go ahead and add this to your quotes for future revenge quotes... The only you guys are getting revenge on is insurance premiums. troll

Timbertrolls gonna troll

Jimbo sighting... Behind homeplate at the Dodger game tonight...

Sixers lol. Embiid.... run your mouth some more. Go ahead.

Interesting Lowe post with Ben Falk yesterday. While talking about early season trends, apparently the Lakers transition offense was good last season and half court offense was bad, while this season their transition offense is bad while half court offense is good. Pretty much the exact opposite of what you'd expect when analyzing teams run by D'Angelo, a pick and roll savant and Lonzo, an open floor enthusiast.

Also Lakers are 10th in the league in defensive rating. It might not last long but while it does..

Slava wrote:Interesting Lowe post with Ben Falk yesterday. While talking about early season trends, apparently the Lakers transition offense was good last season and half court offense was bad, while this season their transition offense is bad while half court offense is good. Pretty much the exact opposite of what you'd expect when analyzing teams run by D'Angelo, a pick and roll savant and Lonzo, an open floor enthusiast.

Hearing Zack say he will die on the Julius Randle hill almost every podcast is a head scratcher.

iamworthy wrote:

Slava wrote:Interesting Lowe post with Ben Falk yesterday. While talking about early season trends, apparently the Lakers transition offense was good last season and half court offense was bad, while this season their transition offense is bad while half court offense is good. Pretty much the exact opposite of what you'd expect when analyzing teams run by D'Angelo, a pick and roll savant and Lonzo, an open floor enthusiast.

Hearing Zack say he will die on the Julius Randle hill almost every podcast is a head scratcher.

You can understand why when he shows glimpses of his swiss army knife prowess like last game vs Wizards or the game at Atlanta last year. That is a very intriguing skill set provided we can harness it more regularly. Kids usually increase their consistency and find that professionalism in their mid to late 20s.

Slava wrote:

iamworthy wrote:

Slava wrote:Interesting Lowe post with Ben Falk yesterday. While talking about early season trends, apparently the Lakers transition offense was good last season and half court offense was bad, while this season their transition offense is bad while half court offense is good. Pretty much the exact opposite of what you'd expect when analyzing teams run by D'Angelo, a pick and roll savant and Lonzo, an open floor enthusiast.

Hearing Zack say he will die on the Julius Randle hill almost every podcast is a head scratcher.

You can understand why when he shows glimpses of his swiss army knife prowess like last game vs Wizards or the game at Atlanta last year. That is a very intriguing skill set provided we can harness it more regularly. Kids usually increase their consistency and find that professionalism in their mid to late 20s.

He's been saying that for at least a couple years. Meanwhile Randle's roll with the team is being reduced. I know Randle was a hero last night but going into the 4th quarter he had played 6 minutes the entire game. He ended up playing 19 minutes to include overtime I think so take away OT and Luke was going to play him around 14 minutes the entire game. As new information comes in you'd kinda expect people to change their stance.... Maybe not. That's clearly the case with Ingram though, ESPN basketball guys that were pro Ingram last year are saying he's not that dude this year. Honestly I don't even think zach watched the Lakers.

iamworthy wrote:

Slava wrote:

iamworthy wrote:
Hearing Zack say he will die on the Julius Randle hill almost every podcast is a head scratcher.

You can understand why when he shows glimpses of his swiss army knife prowess like last game vs Wizards or the game at Atlanta last year. That is a very intriguing skill set provided we can harness it more regularly. Kids usually increase their consistency and find that professionalism in their mid to late 20s.

He's been saying that for at least a couple years. Meanwhile Randle's roll with the team is being reduced. I know Randle was a hero last night but going into the 4th quarter he had played 6 minutes the entire game. He ended up playing 19 minutes to include overtime I think so take away OT and Luke was going to play him around 14 minutes the entire game. As new information comes in you'd kinda expect people to change their stance.... Maybe not. That's clearly the case with Ingram though, ESPN basketball guys that were pro Ingram last year are saying he's not that dude this year. Honestly I don't even think zach watched the Lakers.

Zach watches a **** load of basketball and he usually doesn't talk about things he doesn't know. Like he never mentions anything draft related as he admits to not following NCAA as closely as others do.

Slava wrote:

iamworthy wrote:

Slava wrote:
You can understand why when he shows glimpses of his swiss army knife prowess like last game vs Wizards or the game at Atlanta last year. That is a very intriguing skill set provided we can harness it more regularly. Kids usually increase their consistency and find that professionalism in their mid to late 20s.

He's been saying that for at least a couple years. Meanwhile Randle's roll with the team is being reduced. I know Randle was a hero last night but going into the 4th quarter he had played 6 minutes the entire game. He ended up playing 19 minutes to include overtime I think so take away OT and Luke was going to play him around 14 minutes the entire game. As new information comes in you'd kinda expect people to change their stance.... Maybe not. That's clearly the case with Ingram though, ESPN basketball guys that were pro Ingram last year are saying he's not that dude this year. Honestly I don't even think zach watched the Lakers.

Zach watches a **** load of basketball and he usually doesn't talk about things he doesn't know. Like he never mentions anything draft related as he admits to not following NCAA as closely as others do.

I'm not sure somebody that watches a ton of basketball would say they would die on the Julius Randle hill. That's a strong statement. Especially when the team that pays him seemingly thinks the opposite. I have nothing against Julius, I'm just monitoring the Lakers actions.

I could be over blowing his die on the hill statement but he says it a lot about Randle and he admits it. But I'm like, if you're going to die on that hill what are you willing to do for the Greek freak.

Meh I think his comment means more like he sees something in Julius that others don't whereas everyone was on the Giannis bandwagon at the first hint of his talent. If you read his previous columns he states clearly that not a lot of people appreciate a PF who cannot shoot but Randle is a unique case because he has tremendous footspeed relative to his position and that comes into play when he switches on pick and roll. He held his own against quicker PGs like Schroeder and Wall and got blocks, that's a scary good defensive skill if he can bring it more often. Hell I wouldn't even mind starting him at center if he brings that motor more consistently.

Lakers have two on the list