ImageImageImageImageImage

Projecting the Lakers cap room

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#1 » by dockingsched » Fri Feb 9, 2018 1:29 am

So now that the lakers are seemingly back in the 2018 sweepstakes with Clarkson off the books, there’s been a lot of questions about what this means for getting two max free agents or even keeping Randle.

I figured it would be helpful to start a thread to centralize this discussion where a new tool was introduced to everyone called the capulator. Everyone should check it out, let’s you choose what cap holds to renounce, players to stretch, and options to decline to see how it affects the cap.

Read on Twitter



Also, here’s this:

Read on Twitter
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
Rosque
Analyst
Posts: 3,048
And1: 2,010
Joined: Aug 11, 2012
 

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#2 » by Rosque » Fri Feb 9, 2018 1:37 am

I'm stuck on capculator on signing PG. Cannot for the love of God confirm the signing.
"All these guys who run these organizations who talk about analytics, they have one thing in common: They're a bunch of guys who ain't never played the game, they never got the girls in high school, and they just want to get in the game."
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 38,250
And1: 9,955
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
     

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#3 » by TyCobb » Fri Feb 9, 2018 1:41 am

That Sham link is super legit.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
SlimShady83
RealGM
Posts: 14,459
And1: 4,361
Joined: Jun 19, 2012

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#4 » by SlimShady83 » Fri Feb 9, 2018 1:48 am

I really think we should keep Randle - getting big man in the leauge today gonna be hard
My Go Team
Magic, Jordan, Pippen, Duncan, Shaq

My Counter
Stockton, Kobe, Bird, Rodman, Dirk

Today's Team
Luka, SGA, Tatum, Giannis, Wemby
TheHartBreakKid
General Manager
Posts: 8,124
And1: 4,818
Joined: Aug 29, 2006
 

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#5 » by TheHartBreakKid » Fri Feb 9, 2018 1:49 am

Basically, we can keep Randle if Lebron/PG take a combined pay cut of 8 million per year, correct? PG and Lebron's maxes combined to around 66 million....if they combine to 58 million instead we have the 12 million needed to not renounce Randle...do I have it right?
User avatar
Rosque
Analyst
Posts: 3,048
And1: 2,010
Joined: Aug 11, 2012
 

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#6 » by Rosque » Fri Feb 9, 2018 1:49 am

Got it working.

So.

Waived Deng, Ennis.

Re-sign Lopez and Randle for combined salary of 31 mil. Sign max PG13. Still got 10 mil left. Signed Belinelli for 14/2

Ball/Caruso
PG13/Hart
Ingram/Marco Belinelli
Kuzma/Tolliver
Lopez/Randle/Zubac/Bryant
"All these guys who run these organizations who talk about analytics, they have one thing in common: They're a bunch of guys who ain't never played the game, they never got the girls in high school, and they just want to get in the game."
Sedale Threatt
RealGM
Posts: 50,848
And1: 44,884
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#7 » by Sedale Threatt » Fri Feb 9, 2018 1:53 am

wafer88 wrote:Basically, we can keep Randle if Lebron/PG take a combined pay cut of 8 million per year, correct? PG and Lebron's maxes combined to around 66 million....if they combine to 58 million instead we have the 12 million needed to not renounce Randle...do I have it right?


I could have been way off, but that's how it looks to me.

LeBron wipes his ass with $4 million. But, he also said he was never going to take another pay cut after Miami. So ... ?
User avatar
Rosque
Analyst
Posts: 3,048
And1: 2,010
Joined: Aug 11, 2012
 

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#8 » by Rosque » Fri Feb 9, 2018 1:55 am

wafer88 wrote:Basically, we can keep Randle if Lebron/PG take a combined pay cut of 8 million per year, correct? PG and Lebron's maxes combined to around 66 million....if they combine to 58 million instead we have the 12 million needed to not renounce Randle...do I have it right?

Their's do combine for 66. Stretching Deng and waiving Ennis while giving Caruso 1yr vet minimum puts us at 58 mil.

So it's either more support for PG + Randle FAs or PG+LBJ but no role players and no Randle.

Renouncing Randle gets us at 70 mil and leaves us with 5.5 mil in contracts. Enough for players like Tolliver.

This is why I do not like getting LBJ. No depth after first 7 players

Ball/Caruso
PG13/Hart
LeBron/Ingram
Kuzma/Tolliver
Bryant/Zubac

edit - ye go for lbj. changed my mind
"All these guys who run these organizations who talk about analytics, they have one thing in common: They're a bunch of guys who ain't never played the game, they never got the girls in high school, and they just want to get in the game."
Gus McCrae
General Manager
Posts: 8,262
And1: 2,067
Joined: Dec 07, 2007
     

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#9 » by Gus McCrae » Fri Feb 9, 2018 2:06 am

This is off topic somewhat but can someone link me to how it works to re-sign your own player vs them becoming a FA? What is the benefit of them staying with the team that drafted them? I thought it was like 10%higher salary and an additional year under bird rights or something but I couldn’t find exactly what I was loooking for.

Talking with a Knicks fan about what the Knicks can offer porzingis to re-sign even though he hates the Knicks
Spens1
RealGM
Posts: 13,865
And1: 3,879
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
     

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#10 » by Spens1 » Fri Feb 9, 2018 2:17 am

Ideally

- We stretch Deng
- Sign our two max players
- Don't bring back Lopez and instead bring back Randle

I think that should work in theory at least assuming we renounce Lopez.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#11 » by dockingsched » Fri Feb 9, 2018 2:18 am

Gus McCrae wrote:This is off topic somewhat but can someone link me to how it works to re-sign your own player vs them becoming a FA? What is the benefit of them staying with the team that drafted them? I thought it was like 10%higher salary and an additional year under bird rights or something but I couldn’t find exactly what I was loooking for.

Talking with a Knicks fan about what the Knicks can offer porzingis to re-sign even though he hates the Knicks


A team with bird rights can sign a player up to 5 years with 8% annual raises. That’s the only way to sign a player to a 5 year deal and it’s one of only two ways to give a player 8% annual raises. Otherwise it’s limited to 5% raises

http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q53
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
BBBKobe
Junior
Posts: 482
And1: 148
Joined: Sep 09, 2017

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#12 » by BBBKobe » Fri Feb 9, 2018 2:23 am

Spens1 wrote:Ideally

- We stretch Deng
- Sign our two max players
- Don't bring back Lopez and instead bring back Randle

I think that should work in theory at least assuming we renounce Lopez.


We’d have to renounce Randle and he would have to take a huge paycut.
Gus McCrae
General Manager
Posts: 8,262
And1: 2,067
Joined: Dec 07, 2007
     

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#13 » by Gus McCrae » Fri Feb 9, 2018 2:26 am

dockingsched wrote:
Gus McCrae wrote:This is off topic somewhat but can someone link me to how it works to re-sign your own player vs them becoming a FA? What is the benefit of them staying with the team that drafted them? I thought it was like 10%higher salary and an additional year under bird rights or something but I couldn’t find exactly what I was loooking for.

Talking with a Knicks fan about what the Knicks can offer porzingis to re-sign even though he hates the Knicks




A team with bird rights can sign a player up to 5 years with 8% annual raises. That’s the only way to sign a player to a 5 year deal and it’s one of only two ways to give a player 8% annual raises. Otherwise it’s limited to 5% raises

http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q53


Thank you! So he could sign 5 years $148Mm with the Knicks and be capped at 4 years $108Mm if he leaves ... roughly . Greatly appreciated
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,603
And1: 12,316
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#14 » by Kilroy » Fri Feb 9, 2018 2:27 am

Sedale Threatt wrote:
wafer88 wrote:Basically, we can keep Randle if Lebron/PG take a combined pay cut of 8 million per year, correct? PG and Lebron's maxes combined to around 66 million....if they combine to 58 million instead we have the 12 million needed to not renounce Randle...do I have it right?


I could have been way off, but that's how it looks to me.

LeBron wipes his ass with $4 million. But, he also said he was never going to take another pay cut after Miami. So ... ?


I think if Randle signs his QO for next season we can sign PG and LeBron to the max then sign Randle to a new contract after... And still have around a mil to play with...
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
TheHartBreakKid
General Manager
Posts: 8,124
And1: 4,818
Joined: Aug 29, 2006
 

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#15 » by TheHartBreakKid » Fri Feb 9, 2018 2:27 am

Sedale Threatt wrote:
wafer88 wrote:Basically, we can keep Randle if Lebron/PG take a combined pay cut of 8 million per year, correct? PG and Lebron's maxes combined to around 66 million....if they combine to 58 million instead we have the 12 million needed to not renounce Randle...do I have it right?


I could have been way off, but that's how it looks to me.

LeBron wipes his ass with $4 million. But, he also said he was never going to take another pay cut after Miami. So ... ?




Yeah...he did say that, but I honestly took it more as "I'm not going to take a paycut in Cleveland"...with a straight F U to Gilbert as in Im not taking paycuts to have you pay less taxes. I definitely think IF Lebron believes that Julius is an important piece, he would take a pay cut....Honestly though, he probably would rather bring some of his buddies along if he's going to take a paycut.
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 20,137
And1: 8,916
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#16 » by iamworthy » Fri Feb 9, 2018 2:28 am

Excellent thread doc.

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


We should also probably calculate a max contract for Ingram in two years
Image
TheHartBreakKid
General Manager
Posts: 8,124
And1: 4,818
Joined: Aug 29, 2006
 

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#17 » by TheHartBreakKid » Fri Feb 9, 2018 2:31 am

Rosque wrote:
wafer88 wrote:Basically, we can keep Randle if Lebron/PG take a combined pay cut of 8 million per year, correct? PG and Lebron's maxes combined to around 66 million....if they combine to 58 million instead we have the 12 million needed to not renounce Randle...do I have it right?

Their's do combine for 66. Stretching Deng and waiving Ennis while giving Caruso 1yr vet minimum puts us at 58 mil.

So it's either more support for PG + Randle FAs or PG+LBJ but no role players and no Randle.

Renouncing Randle gets us at 70 mil and leaves us with 5.5 mil in contracts. Enough for players like Tolliver.

This is why I do not like getting LBJ. No depth after first 7 players

Ball/Caruso
PG13/Hart
LeBron/Ingram
Kuzma/Tolliver
Bryant/Zubac

edit - ye go for lbj. changed my mind



Depth will definitely be an issue, but I think without Randle and no paycuts, we can hopefully sign a better piece than a Tolliver with that 5 million....the FA market isn't all that hot next year. But yeah, this is actually another reason i'm glad we have another pick to play around with....and the Denver second. Hopefully we can add atleast another rotation player with those picks.
BBBKobe
Junior
Posts: 482
And1: 148
Joined: Sep 09, 2017

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#18 » by BBBKobe » Fri Feb 9, 2018 2:33 am

I think the biggest thing this summer will be ensuring we get verbal commitments from these max players.. PG.. Lebron.

We can't stretch Deng and then strike out in FA, that would just be stupid. Only stretch him if we need the money for PG and Lebron. I'd be perfectly fine with keeping Deng another year if we strike out. He'll be an expiring contract next summer.
Spens1
RealGM
Posts: 13,865
And1: 3,879
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
     

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#19 » by Spens1 » Fri Feb 9, 2018 2:46 am

BBBKobe wrote:
Spens1 wrote:Ideally

- We stretch Deng
- Sign our two max players
- Don't bring back Lopez and instead bring back Randle

I think that should work in theory at least assuming we renounce Lopez.


We’d have to renounce Randle and he would have to take a huge paycut.


when you say paycut are you saying he actually gets a minimum or he takes a 8 mill extension instead of a 12?
TheHartBreakKid
General Manager
Posts: 8,124
And1: 4,818
Joined: Aug 29, 2006
 

Re: Projecting the Lakers cap room 

Post#20 » by TheHartBreakKid » Fri Feb 9, 2018 2:51 am

Spens1 wrote:
BBBKobe wrote:
Spens1 wrote:Ideally

- We stretch Deng
- Sign our two max players
- Don't bring back Lopez and instead bring back Randle

I think that should work in theory at least assuming we renounce Lopez.


We’d have to renounce Randle and he would have to take a huge paycut.


when you say paycut are you saying he actually gets a minimum or he takes a 8 mill extension instead of a 12?




yup...if anyone is going to take paycuts its going to be superstars heading into their 2nd and 3rd big contracts, not the 24 year old trying to get his first.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers