Page 1 of 2
Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:14 pm
by sirronstuff

Yes, it's true he doesn't look like a rookie so much, and someone said something about cul de sac covered by cotton candy

, but....
Is this guys capable of being our backup PG? Strictly 3rd string? Is he an NBA caliber player?
I liked what I saw in spurts against certain teams, but as soon as there was effective ball pressure, I felt he was extremely ineffective. He has a long way to go to be a true NBA level backup, but I like him as 3rd string. Great vision and effort, finds guys, works hard, but just limited.
But bro.....how long before you shave the hair?
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:26 pm
by snaquille oatmeal
IMO he can in the right system. we do have the right system for him on many levels. for one he is cheap, two our up tempo system is one he is familiar with and has enough basketball experience to be serviceable at the backup PG position. three he may not be top tear backup PG, but he is good enough.
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:28 pm
by danfantastk32
Totally unnecessary. If we get Lebron, he's like 5th string PG. Ball, Hart, Ingram, Lebron. I mean...Maybe even Kuz lol.
If Ball, Ingram, Lebron, Hart all get hurt....then who cares? Shucks....we shoulda kept him.
If he gets a spot at the back of our bench, then good for him. But I could care less.
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 7:53 pm
by SlimShady83
He can against some teams, but not against every team - his more of a 3rd string pg and I'd like for us to keep him - his only 20 years and a rookie, give him time. comes on the cheap, doesn't bitch or complain about playing time
If we don't get a star player OR maybe we just get 1 star player - IT will be our back up PG then Caruso/PGII
Ball, IT, Caruso, PGII - No more ennis
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 8:19 pm
by Landsberger
Mediocre players on very poor teams. Be careful. Caruso and to a lesser extent Hart are guys who would not have much of an impact on true contenders IMHO. Too limited in their overall game. Caruso has good vision and decent handles but has issues separating enough to use them. Hart is a little different but still a limited player. Both could fill a role on a really good team if the dominos fell just right. Of the 2 I'd give the nod to Hart as a combo guard second off the bench.
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 8:43 pm
by what would jack bauer do?
Right now, he's a third stringer. Maybe he'll improve but he is 24 so I dunno if that'll happen. He's average enough defensively, but offensively he can't do much with the ball in terms of pushing tempo or attacking in half court sets at this level. His jumper's got a slow release and it's exposed out in front of him which hurts him in our style of offense. If we get a superstar that creates wide open shots for others he'd be a decent back up. But really he's a third stringer, bring him in to be an energy guy.
We did better when we had a lengthy defensive guy that isn't necessarily a pg that can shoot 3's like Hart rather than Caruso handling the rock. If he could get more pesky on defense like dellavedova yeah he'd be a solid backup, but I really don't think that's in his DNA.
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 10:20 pm
by Dr Aki
3rd stringer PG
He's ok in a pinch and good value for his would be minimum contract
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:15 am
by evilpimp972
Landsberger wrote:Mediocre players on very poor teams. Be careful. Caruso and to a lesser extent Hart are guys who would not have much of an impact on true contenders IMHO. Too limited in their overall game. Caruso has good vision and decent handles but has issues separating enough to use them. Hart is a little different but still a limited player. Both could fill a role on a really good team if the dominos fell just right. Of the 2 I'd give the nod to Hart as a combo guard second off the bench.
Lol Hart would be great on a contender like the Thunder
If Brewer can be a good piece, so is Hart. Shooters always find a team, especially big shooters that can play a bit of defense
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:54 am
by Spens1
No desire to see him on the roster.
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:58 am
by Landsberger
evilpimp972 wrote:Landsberger wrote:Mediocre players on very poor teams. Be careful. Caruso and to a lesser extent Hart are guys who would not have much of an impact on true contenders IMHO. Too limited in their overall game. Caruso has good vision and decent handles but has issues separating enough to use them. Hart is a little different but still a limited player. Both could fill a role on a really good team if the dominos fell just right. Of the 2 I'd give the nod to Hart as a combo guard second off the bench.
Lol Hart would be great on a contender like the Thunder
If Brewer can be a good piece, so is Hart. Shooters always find a team, especially big shooters that can play a bit of defense
First....Thunder are a contender? They are a playoff team but they have Melo.... and any team he's on isn't a contender.
As for Hart. We'll see, but he strikes me as one of those guys who has some success on bad teams. Not that I don't like what he did here but it's easily replaceable. I think he's a second guard off the bench type on a really good team.
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 7:12 am
by danfantastk32
Landsberger wrote:First....Thunder are a contender? They are a playoff team but they have Melo.... and any team he's on isn't a contender.
Not getting into the argument you guys are having.....but I have to say AMEN to that sh** right there! Well put.
Melo is a joke. Greatest thing Jim Buss ever did was totally fail at convincing Melo to come here.
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 5:27 pm
by stan francisco
I say sign him as backup PG. He’s good enough on all fronts and he’s young and cheap and he doesn’t mess up much. His shot selection and efficiency are great. In fact, he could let it fly more often.
Let IT go to wherever, doesn’t fit the system, doesn’t play defense.
PG rotation: BALL/ CARUSO / HART / GP II
SG rotation: HART / INGRAM / CARUSO / AI II
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 6:07 pm
by Kilroy
I think he's 3rd string material on a contender.
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 9:22 pm
by Wavy Q
He's a JAG (just another guy) to me. Abilities that can be replaced by any random vet min.
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2018 7:25 pm
by LAKESHOW
G leaguer. Between Caruso and Hart, Caruso is out of the picture.
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 5:00 am
by Up-And-Coming
I think he's more than capable of being a primary backup if he hits his jumper consistently. That's the biggest glare I see in his game but overall he has proven to be better than Tyler Ennis. Wouldn't mind him as a cheap backup tbh
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 5:16 am
by dub81
No absolutely not. Rondo a FA and we missed out on him. Perfect backup to Zo.
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 8:58 am
by Spanish_Laker
3rd string.
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:40 pm
by stan francisco
dub81 wrote:No absolutely not. Rondo a FA and we missed out on him. Perfect backup to Zo.
I’d be thrilled to have Rondo as backup PG and Caruso third string PG and spot up 3&D SG.
Brilliant. Lonzo could learn so much from Rondo.
Re: Is Caruso capable of being a primary backup, or is he 3rd string material?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 7:01 pm
by Rafer24
Much better than Ennis.
He should stay as 3rd string PG.