Dr Aki wrote:guys, we wouldn't have been able to afford randle long term anyway
besides, we got a worse and older lefty in beasley anyway
Fixed it for you. Lol. You know I usually agree with you but on this I’ll have to respectfully disagree.
IF it weren’t about the money, only about talent and on-court fit, I’d pick Randle’s game over Beasley’s potential to live up to the high pick which he never will live up to anyway. Every day of the week. He posted 36-15 against the Cavs. Once, I know. He’s 23? He’s a total beast of a physical specimen. When did Beasley last do anything near that type of showing? Beasley is enough of a vet to get the game, but his contribution will be hit or miss every night, mostly miss. Never beast.