Page 1 of 1
Svi B Wear
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:39 pm
by snaquille oatmeal
Svi (6'8") is a rookie that needs development. though he is known as a sniper from 3 he is only shooting 35.5 from 3 and 32.6 overall. he has T-Rex arms and is not a game changer at the defensive end. he has shown that he is more than a shooter in Summer League/pre-season and has a lot of potential for the future.
Wear (6'9") is 28 years old and although may not have a higher ceiling than Svi, he is in his prime now and seems to be better now than Svi and is NBA ready. he is averaging 18 points in 31 minutes in the G-League. He is shooting 41.2 from 3 and 46.4 overall. should this two switch teams for now? have wear with the Lakers and Svi getting burn with the South Bay?
I like Svi, but I think now, Travis would help more.
where you at?
Re: Svi B Wear
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:59 pm
by TylersLakers
Svi shot the ball way better on the road trip. I’d keep that going.
Re: Svi B Wear
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 8:31 pm
by Wavy Q
How can i select both the 1st and 4th option, thinking_emoji
Re: Svi B Wear
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 11:52 pm
by snaquille oatmeal
so by voting Wear is trash what are you saying about Svi?
Re: Svi B Wear
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 11:58 pm
by RamonSessions7
snaquille oatmeal wrote:so by voting Wear is trash what are you saying about Svi?
That he should be in G League getting burn?
Re: Svi B Wear
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 6:05 am
by politm
He should only touch the ball when he's wide open in the corner. Other then that I cringe every time I see him put the ball on the floor.
Re: Svi B Wear
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:34 pm
by stan francisco
I’d like to see both Svi and Wear in the third unit.
Re: Svi B Wear
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 2:41 am
by Landsberger
Is there a "release both and sign a waived player at the deadline" choice coming.....
That's a little harsh but why the interest in the very end of the bench?. I'd say if either one of them is relevant to our team then we're not where we want to be.
Re: Svi B Wear
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 8:53 am
by stan francisco
Landsberger wrote:... why the interest in the very end of the bench?. I'd say if either one of them is relevant to our team then we're not where we want to be.
That’s our biggest problem. In other words, we’re doing just fine. Our record proves it, LBJ is smiling. Double triple double Magic is on.
Why not try to fix our third unit which currently lacks a PF? What’s our depth at the four should LBJ get injured for a few games? Wear looked hood the other day in a GL game I watched. Solid 3&D. Shot’s falling.
Re: Svi B Wear
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 4:49 pm
by Landsberger
stan francisco wrote:Landsberger wrote:... why the interest in the very end of the bench?. I'd say if either one of them is relevant to our team then we're not where we want to be.
That’s our biggest problem. In other words, we’re doing just fine. Our record proves it, LBJ is smiling. Double triple double Magic is on.
Why not try to fix our third unit which currently lacks a PF? What’s our depth at the four should LBJ get injured for a few games? Wear looked hood the other day in a GL game I watched. Solid 3&D. Shot’s falling.
OK, I get that but the majority of this team will be different next year. "Development" days are over for the most part.
Re: Svi B Wear
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 5:01 pm
by snaquille oatmeal
Landsberger wrote:stan francisco wrote:Landsberger wrote:... why the interest in the very end of the bench?. I'd say if either one of them is relevant to our team then we're not where we want to be.
That’s our biggest problem. In other words, we’re doing just fine. Our record proves it, LBJ is smiling. Double triple double Magic is on.
Why not try to fix our third unit which currently lacks a PF? What’s our depth at the four should LBJ get injured for a few games? Wear looked hood the other day in a GL game I watched. Solid 3&D. Shot’s falling.
OK, I get that but the majority of this team will be different next year. "Development" days are over for the most part.
what you need to realize as well is that next year our second and third unit are gonna look like trash because we won't have money to sign the KCPs, Rondos, and Stevensons of the world. our third string is going to need a cheap asset like Wear.
Re: Svi B Wear
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 6:30 pm
by Landsberger
snaquille oatmeal wrote:Landsberger wrote:stan francisco wrote:
That’s our biggest problem. In other words, we’re doing just fine. Our record proves it, LBJ is smiling. Double triple double Magic is on.
Why not try to fix our third unit which currently lacks a PF? What’s our depth at the four should LBJ get injured for a few games? Wear looked hood the other day in a GL game I watched. Solid 3&D. Shot’s falling.
OK, I get that but the majority of this team will be different next year. "Development" days are over for the most part.
what you need to realize as well is that next year our second and third unit are gonna look like trash because we won't have money to sign the KCPs, Rondos, and Stevensons of the world. our third string is going to need a cheap asset like Wear.
Then he needs to be playing in the G league not rotting on the end of the bench. Svi as well. They are both in need of development. Svi especially.
Re: Svi B Wear
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 10:06 pm
by stan francisco
Wear is playing in the GL and doing it well.