Lakers Roster ideas
Posted: Thu Feb 7, 2019 1:46 pm
I really don't like what happened with NOP, the negociations were a hoax, but there are still plenty of things that can get done and improve talent, chemistry and balance.
First of all, the starting 5 is not suited for starting games, because BI is not suited as a SG, Lonzo is still inconsistent as a shooter and Kuzma is not yet strong enough to handle all the PF's and penetration in general ('though he has improved his footwork).
Trading for Reggie Bullock helps, and I'd demote BI to the bench (more on that later).
One trade that is necessary is for Nikola Vucevic - he's got improving footwoork, even on Defense, which allows him to play efficiently (scoring, rebounding, even passing this year).
KCP, Stephenson, FRP, maybe even Bonga (I'd try to hang on the Wagner, plus his trade value isn't high) - could potentially satisfy Orlando, knowing that the pick will be in the 15-20 range.
This particular trade also clears roster spots for the FA's after buyouts (more on that later, as well).
I'd also look for PF with girth, the kind who will do the dirty work in the paint (the only other player with that profile on the roster is Tyson Chandler). Maybe Noah Vonleh (NY wants max FA's this summer so he knows he's going away) or Bobby Portis.
So with a starting 5 of Ball - Bullock - James - Vonleh - Vucevic, you know you'd get enough shooting to maximize the talents of Lonzo and LBJ.
Those 5 can be subbed entirely, for example, for Rondo - Hart - Ingram - Kuzma - Zubac, with McGee, Chandler or Beasley contributing spot minutes.
Vucevic has had a great season, but would probably be even more efficient in 26-28 mpg. Bullock and Vonleh are not worth more than 16-20 mpg, but their presence would balance things (spot up shooting, defensive assignements). And then bring the subs in, I'd imagine they'd all be a bit pissed (let's hope it's gonna be in a positive way) and run the other team out of the gym. Ingram and Kuzma would still finish games as they have more talent than the others, and overall the team play would improve.
Best-case scenario with this group: 4 or 5 seed.
Worst case scenario: 8 or 9 seed.
Realistic scenario: 6 seed, maybe a second round exit but with clear improvements to show for the year.
First of all, the starting 5 is not suited for starting games, because BI is not suited as a SG, Lonzo is still inconsistent as a shooter and Kuzma is not yet strong enough to handle all the PF's and penetration in general ('though he has improved his footwork).
Trading for Reggie Bullock helps, and I'd demote BI to the bench (more on that later).
One trade that is necessary is for Nikola Vucevic - he's got improving footwoork, even on Defense, which allows him to play efficiently (scoring, rebounding, even passing this year).
KCP, Stephenson, FRP, maybe even Bonga (I'd try to hang on the Wagner, plus his trade value isn't high) - could potentially satisfy Orlando, knowing that the pick will be in the 15-20 range.
This particular trade also clears roster spots for the FA's after buyouts (more on that later, as well).
I'd also look for PF with girth, the kind who will do the dirty work in the paint (the only other player with that profile on the roster is Tyson Chandler). Maybe Noah Vonleh (NY wants max FA's this summer so he knows he's going away) or Bobby Portis.
So with a starting 5 of Ball - Bullock - James - Vonleh - Vucevic, you know you'd get enough shooting to maximize the talents of Lonzo and LBJ.
Those 5 can be subbed entirely, for example, for Rondo - Hart - Ingram - Kuzma - Zubac, with McGee, Chandler or Beasley contributing spot minutes.
Vucevic has had a great season, but would probably be even more efficient in 26-28 mpg. Bullock and Vonleh are not worth more than 16-20 mpg, but their presence would balance things (spot up shooting, defensive assignements). And then bring the subs in, I'd imagine they'd all be a bit pissed (let's hope it's gonna be in a positive way) and run the other team out of the gym. Ingram and Kuzma would still finish games as they have more talent than the others, and overall the team play would improve.
Best-case scenario with this group: 4 or 5 seed.
Worst case scenario: 8 or 9 seed.
Realistic scenario: 6 seed, maybe a second round exit but with clear improvements to show for the year.