Page 1 of 4

Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sat Mar 9, 2019 5:04 pm
by ducler
Image
Read on Twitter

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sat Mar 9, 2019 8:22 pm
by TylersLakers
Play the people that play hard. Period.

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 12:16 am
by Ballerhogger
No kumza .no BI . Let’s just ball out and make Cs cry

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 1:29 am
by Landsberger
TylersLakers wrote:Play the people that play hard. Period.

We have what... about 9 active players or so? Everyone will play is my guess. We have no secondary scorer at all.... in the Kobe days you could see 60 coming in a game like this. Does Bron try that or do we just go quietly?

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 1:45 am
by Landsberger
Well.... defense is utter crap.

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 1:48 am
by Danny Darko
jeff van gundy winning me over right now...

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 1:48 am
by Danny Darko
Jeff and Marc battling for that coaching job on air wow

I'm with Jeff

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 1:48 am
by thebigbird
Tatum is so overrated by casual fans. The people who act like he's leaps and bounds above Ingram/Kuzma are tripping.

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 1:48 am
by Landsberger
Danny Darko wrote:jeff van gundy winning me over right now...


He probably found out he's not on the "short list".... :lol:

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 1:52 am
by Landsberger
thebigbird wrote:Tatum is so overrated by casual fans. The people who act like he's leaps and bounds above Ingram/Kuzma are tripping.


That's a mouthful because Kuzma is underrated by Laker fans :lol:

I haven't seen enough of him to make a judgement. He seems pretty low energy and not engaged at times.

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 1:53 am
by Landsberger
Get a few stops.... get out in transition.... and score easily. Hmm...

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 1:53 am
by Danny Darko
I never want to see Rob Pelinka's starving cheek face as part of this franchise again.

Mana from get the **** out of here

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 2:03 am
by TJM217
Watching this the same thing comes to mind. Who the heck is Rando guarding?!?

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 2:03 am
by thebigbird
Landsberger wrote:
thebigbird wrote:Tatum is so overrated by casual fans. The people who act like he's leaps and bounds above Ingram/Kuzma are tripping.


That's a mouthful because Kuzma is underrated by Laker fans :lol:

I haven't seen enough of him to make a judgement. He seems pretty low energy and not engaged at times.

I think people got carried away with Tatum due to him playing well in the ECF last year. I'd still say he's got more potential than Kuzma, but only because of the age difference. I really like Kuz.

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 2:03 am
by Landsberger
This group can't score at all.... hustling on Defense however.

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 2:05 am
by Landsberger
Rondo playing some inspired post defense on big Al... love that. Why he's been on Al is a question that needs an answer however.

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 2:08 am
by Landsberger
thebigbird wrote:
Landsberger wrote:
thebigbird wrote:Tatum is so overrated by casual fans. The people who act like he's leaps and bounds above Ingram/Kuzma are tripping.


That's a mouthful because Kuzma is underrated by Laker fans :lol:

I haven't seen enough of him to make a judgement. He seems pretty low energy and not engaged at times.

I think people got carried away with Tatum due to him playing well in the ECF last year. I'd still say he's got more potential than Kuzma, but only because of the age difference. I really like Kuz.


The "P" word. I'm much more about what's happening now than in the future. A huge bunch of guys have had potential in the one and done era and only a few realized it. Not to say that he won't but I'll take what is now over what isn't.

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 2:10 am
by Landsberger
Who's playing for our G league team tonight.... most of them are currently on the court.

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 2:10 am
by TJM217
I don’t see the foul

Re: Game 66: Boston Celtics (40-26) @ Los Angeles Lakers (30-35) - 8:30 PM ET

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2019 2:12 am
by thebigbird
Landsberger wrote:
thebigbird wrote:
Landsberger wrote:
That's a mouthful because Kuzma is underrated by Laker fans :lol:

I haven't seen enough of him to make a judgement. He seems pretty low energy and not engaged at times.

I think people got carried away with Tatum due to him playing well in the ECF last year. I'd still say he's got more potential than Kuzma, but only because of the age difference. I really like Kuz.


The "P" word. I'm much more about what's happening now than in the future. A huge bunch of guys have had potential in the one and done era and only a few realized it. Not to say that he won't but I'll take what is now over what isn't.

100% agree with you on that.