So basically give up JaVale and Kieff plus a second to get Gasol?
That may be too much to give up.
And we would still need a big to either start or back up Gasol if we give up Javale.
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
EArl wrote:Giving up Javale would hurt. I think we need both Javale and Gasol to split the 5 minutes. If we only keep Marc, im assuming Harrel splits the minutes?
Slava wrote:I pulled a hammy while fapping. I won't make fun of Nash.
ROballer wrote:Of course. Harrell basically only played the 5 the past 2 years for the Clippers.
Those thinking he will play the 4 here are delusional.We still got AD/Kuzma and possible somebody else.
It's gonna be similar to the Clippers scenario, only the FO apparently wants Gasol to play Zubac 15-20 mins as a starter and not McGee.
chefy wrote:Please don’t trade for a washed up Marc Gasol. Should’ve just kept the Howard for 3 mil then. Rather have this front court
Vae Victus wrote:Lakers really did mess up in not re-signing DHo for the vet min.
Javale can eat mins in the regular season and be benched when he sucks and DHo comes in with elite D and against certain matchups.
Honestly at this point, the Lakers should go get Dedmon to be a legit stretch 5, when the team needs a different look. Would be nice to have extra spacing for Lebron and AD to operate.
Get Dedmon and go get some 2nd/3rd string PG with size like Lin (to make up a bit for Shroeder) or go midget with Napier for vet mins and call it an offseason.
Beethoven wrote:I rather have baynes over gasol
LakersSoul wrote:Beethoven wrote:I rather have baynes over gasol
Esp if Gasol wants more than vet min.
loveshaq786 wrote:Could mcgee and kuz fetch us.... jalen smith and baynes?