LAKERS return 4.6 Mil Stimulus funding
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2020 3:41 am
Well...
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=1960452
LAKESHOW wrote:Just a PR nightmare. Yes, money returned. But short sighted. No vision. Did not forsee the obvious backlash. They returned the Money, meaning after the fact, they finally then seen the error of their ways. But hey, at least they returned it
snaquille oatmeal wrote:How does that affect the cap?
Jk
Kilroy wrote:I don't get it... I think any uproar over this is pure fake news... Logic dictates that even if we kept it, it wouldn't prevent any other needy small business from getting their own.
And I don't get the feeling the average American cares who takes money from the government or whether they deserve it or not. All I hear is how the government isn't giving enough of it away.
That and it seems like most people literally hate their stimulus checks anyway, because Trump had the audacity to sign them. If I believed social media, there has to be a new hole in the ozone layer from all the people burning their checks.
Satire aside, The Lakers probably shouldn't have gotten a check, I just find any outrage about it highly disingenuous. Half the people bitching, just drove their Porsches to the bank to deposit the check they just got while talking on their iPhone 11s.
There is so much fake outrage out there right now, and so many people that seem clinically unable to mind their own damned business...
Landsberger wrote:Kilroy wrote:I don't get it... I think any uproar over this is pure fake news... Logic dictates that even if we kept it, it wouldn't prevent any other needy small business from getting their own.
And I don't get the feeling the average American cares who takes money from the government or whether they deserve it or not. All I hear is how the government isn't giving enough of it away.
That and it seems like most people literally hate their stimulus checks anyway, because Trump had the audacity to sign them. If I believed social media, there has to be a new hole in the ozone layer from all the people burning their checks.
Satire aside, The Lakers probably shouldn't have gotten a check, I just find any outrage about it highly disingenuous. Half the people bitching, just drove their Porsches to the bank to deposit the check they just got while talking on their iPhone 11s.
There is so much fake outrage out there right now, and so many people that seem clinically unable to mind their own damned business...
Not sure I agree. At some point someone has to have valid outrage at outrageous things or we're all screwed in the end. Music is playing and chairs are disappearing......
Maybe you don't pay taxes but I sure as hell do and that money eventually will come from me and millions like me. I sure as hell wouldn't give it to millionaire trustafarians.
When life long millionaires in a business that will fill any hole in their cashflow with contracted and guaranteed $$ are lining up to get money the powers that be intend (If their is "fake news" it's probably this) to go to the businesses that don't have guaranteed future income I think it's something the "serfs" who will pay those bills in the future should at least question. Business such as a sports franchise have access to large lines of credit that true small businesses do not. I know people who can't get home equity loans right now to save their businesses for example. But then again they don't have access to celebrity politicians either.
The last break in the economy the big banks and their government cronies created they also created protections to shield themselves from the outcome(TARP, QE 1,2,3,4...) in the guise of helping the little guy. Hell the bill that supposedly prevents if from happening again carries the names of the Senator and Congressman that opened the regulatory holes that created it in the first place. Swap the acronym CDO with CLO and it's OK I guess.
I don't see this as a whole lot different. My guess is a year from now the same people supposedly protecting us will be protecting themselves from an open evaluation of the data or a holistic evaluation of the entire social impact of the Great COVID panic of "20.