Page 1 of 1
Plaschke on Mitch
Posted: Mon Jan 7, 2008 4:10 pm
by snaquille oatmeal
http://www.latimes.com/sports/basketball/nba/lakers/la-sp-plaschke4jan04,1,729304.column?page=1&cset=true&ctrack=1&coll=la-headlines-sports-nba-lakersKupchak manages to control the Lakers
Maligned over many of his decisions, the general manager deserves credit for holding onto Andrew Bynum, drafting Jordan Farmar and bringing back Derek Fisher.
January 4, 2008
The guy from the gas company is in my living room, cleaning out a pipe, handing me a pamphlet, walking out the door after another routine repair.
When, suddenly, he stops.
"So," he says, completely out of nowhere. "What are they saying about Mitch Kupchak now?"
I am not ready to jump in the Mitch bandwagon yet, but there is some good insights in this article, especially in the second page.
Posted: Mon Jan 7, 2008 4:29 pm
by tkb
I think Mitch has been underrated for a while. He's done well the last 2-3 years IMO.
Re: Plaschke on Mitch
Posted: Mon Jan 7, 2008 4:33 pm
by Frantik
snaquille oatmeal wrote:http://www.latimes.com/sports/basketball/nba/lakers/la-sp-plaschke4jan04,1,729304.column?page=1&cset=true&ctrack=1&coll=la-headlines-sports-nba-lakersKupchak manages to control the Lakers
Maligned over many of his decisions, the general manager deserves credit for holding onto Andrew Bynum, drafting Jordan Farmar and bringing back Derek Fisher.
January 4, 2008
The guy from the gas company is in my living room, cleaning out a pipe, handing me a pamphlet, walking out the door after another routine repair.
When, suddenly, he stops.
"So," he says, completely out of nowhere. "What are they saying about Mitch Kupchak now?"
I am not ready to jump in the Mitch bandwagon yet, but there is some good insights in this article, especially in the second page.
When Kobe resigns, then i will hop on the mitch bandwagon but i agree...there are some good insights
Re: Plaschke on Mitch
Posted: Mon Jan 7, 2008 4:43 pm
by snaquille oatmeal
Frantik wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
When Kobe resigns, then i will hop on the mitch bandwagon but i agree...there are some good insights
+1
Posted: Mon Jan 7, 2008 4:58 pm
by Tommy Trojan
I read this few days ago.
Mitch should get more of a credit then what he is getting. I remember almost everyone was for trading Bynum (including myself) and if we had traded Bynum look where we would have been? Either with no center or a broken down JO.
Posted: Mon Jan 7, 2008 5:23 pm
by RJM
Before this season, Kupchak was torched for drafting Jordan Farmar. He was ripped for a lack of scouting acumen, for a lack of common sense, putting Kobe's ball in the hands of a mildly skilled kid.
What? Hey did anyone here torch him?
Posted: Mon Jan 7, 2008 6:14 pm
by hermes
i'll jump on the mitch bandwagon
:jumps on:
yep, there's still lots of room on here
Posted: Mon Jan 7, 2008 6:19 pm
by snaquille oatmeal
Iceburg Slim wrote:Before this season, Kupchak was torched for drafting Jordan Farmar. He was ripped for a lack of scouting acumen, for a lack of common sense, putting Kobe's ball in the hands of a mildly skilled kid.
What? Hey did anyone here torch him?
he was torched, tared and feathered, man-handled, and more, but not for drafting Farmar.
Posted: Mon Jan 7, 2008 6:42 pm
by -G-
Iceburg Slim wrote:Before this season, Kupchak was torched for drafting Jordan Farmar. He was ripped for a lack of scouting acumen, for a lack of common sense, putting Kobe's ball in the hands of a mildly skilled kid.
What? Hey did anyone here torch him?
Ya, I thought everyone was glad he fell to us. Plaschke is just making crap up to prove his point.
Posted: Mon Jan 7, 2008 8:28 pm
by Dexmor
Everybody hated him and the truth is if they didn't trade Butler he would be one of the best gm's ever. Grabbing Bynum and keeping him no matter what should put him in the hall of fame. That is almost up there with trade Divac for Kobe.
Some teams take the 10th pick and get Rodney White.
Posted: Mon Jan 7, 2008 10:29 pm
by LAL4Life
The problem with crediting Mitch for all the positives over te past few years is our FO has so many different voices, we don't know who has been responsible for what. For example, was trading Caron for Kwame a Mitch move, or a Phil move? Was drafting Bynum, Ronny, Farmar and Crit a Mitch move, or Jim Buss? Was refusing to include Bynum in trades for JO and Kidd Mitch decisions, or Jim/Jerry decisions? And so on and so forth.
That said, Mitch has quietly assembled a very solid team and a great, young foundation, and he's done it while taking plenty of abuse from Kobe all the way down to the average fan.
Posted: Mon Jan 7, 2008 10:43 pm
by SashAlex
News Hub is not popular.
Posted: Mon Jan 7, 2008 11:25 pm
by snaquille oatmeal
SashAlex wrote:News Hub is not popular.
I read the news hub everyday, but occassionally an article is worth dicussing. keep up the good work in the hub.
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 12:01 am
by SashAlex
snaquille oatmeal wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I read the news hub everyday, but occassionally an article is worth dicussing. keep up the good work in the hub.
Yes, sir !
It wasn't about making a new thread, I just thought nobody reads the News Hub !
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 5:55 am
by The Laker Kid
Well I had to endure 2 years of nothing but first round exits and one missed playoff. A Championship is in order before I can even give him credit...
Sorry Kupchak, LA fans are used to championships. Bynum can dunk 5 million times but if we still get bounced in the playoffs, it's all moot.
Posted: Tue Jan 8, 2008 10:47 pm
by J Rob
^ I agree that as Laker fans, we judge ourselves by championships, not pacific division banners.
However, that being said, this is only the 4th season since Shaq left and the original dynasty was dissolved.
Look where we are at...
At this point we are being widely considered a top 5 team in the league...in the entire league.
We have the best player in the world, one of the rising stars in the league, the deepest young team in the league, and made the playoffs 2 out of 3 years.
All in all, that's about as good as a rebuilding process gets.
Ask the Bulls how they'd feel about being in our shoes: Its been ten years since MJ left and outside of last year, they've been either terrible, or a one and done team.
Look at Jerry West as well. After Magic retired it took him almost ten years to get us at championship contender level again.
By next season if Bynum takes his game to another level, we are legitimate championship contenders in only 5 seasons.
That's not too shabby. Believe me, I was a Laker fan in the 90's and this is not that bad.
Posted: Wed Jan 9, 2008 5:15 pm
by Tommy Trojan
J Rob wrote:^ I agree that as Laker fans, we judge ourselves by championships, not pacific division banners.
However, that being said, this is only the 4th season since Shaq left and the original dynasty was dissolved.
Look where we are at...
At this point we are being widely considered a top 5 team in the league...in the entire league.
We have the best player in the world, one of the rising stars in the league, the deepest young team in the league, and made the playoffs 2 out of 3 years.
All in all, that's about as good as a rebuilding process gets.
Ask the Bulls how they'd feel about being in our shoes: Its been ten years since MJ left and outside of last year, they've been either terrible, or a one and done team.
Look at Jerry West as well. After Magic retired it took him almost ten years to get us at championship contender level again.
By next season if Bynum takes his game to another level, we are legitimate championship contenders in only 5 seasons.
That's not too shabby. Believe me, I was a Laker fan in the 90's and this is not that bad.