ImageImageImageImageImage

Farmar or Fisher?

Moderators: Danny Darko, TyCobb, Kilroy

User avatar
J Rob
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,559
And1: 1
Joined: May 03, 2006

Farmar or Fisher? 

Post#1 » by J Rob » Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:59 am

I don't start too many threads, but after discussing the point with miles it seems like a good question to ask:

Should Farmar take the starting job and the lion's share of the minutes over Fisher?

Fisher is and was always a great leader, but we get stagnate sometimes with him in.

On top of that, isn't this the only way we can know if Farmar is worth keeping or trading for Jason Kidd?

Right now, we're trying to speculate on 20 minutes of play with the reserves, if the 21 year old point guard is worth offering or retaining in a trade for the greatest PG in the last 15 years.

Imo, we should give him the starting job with 30+ minutes and see what we're really working with so we know if its worth giving him up for 2 or 3 years of Kidd.
User avatar
DoctaJ
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,714
And1: 458
Joined: Dec 11, 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
   

 

Post#2 » by DoctaJ » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:04 am

If we're going to do that..

In my opinion, I'd like to see Farmar, Fish, Kobe start, atleast while Ariza/Walton are injured and Vlad is still getting back into the game.

I agree that Farmar needs to get more minutes.
User avatar
J Rob
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,559
And1: 1
Joined: May 03, 2006

 

Post#3 » by J Rob » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:09 am

^ Or even put Sasha in that SG role.

He locked up Crawford tonight.

As Miles said in the Kidd thread, our best lineup is...
Farmar
Sasha
Kobe
Odom
Turiaf
User avatar
tagsu
Sophomore
Posts: 153
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 26, 2007
Location: 818

 

Post#4 » by tagsu » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:22 am

tough question.. it's hard to deal away any homegrown talent such as farmar.. sure championships are the ultimate goal but it is the path there which yields the true glory.. my heart says keep farmar but my brain says get kidd he's a proven champ.

i think really the question should be taken in a larger context such as what is our system of playing basketball and how well does kidd fit as a piece to a laker championship
User avatar
tagsu
Sophomore
Posts: 153
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 26, 2007
Location: 818

 

Post#5 » by tagsu » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:30 am

tough question.. it's hard to deal away any homegrown talent such as farmar.. sure championships are the ultimate goal but it is the path there which yields the true glory.. my heart says keep farmar but my brain says get kidd he's a proven champ.

i think really the question should be taken in a larger context such as what is our system of playing basketball and how well does kidd fit as a piece to a laker championship
User avatar
crazyeights
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,923
And1: 2,231
Joined: Dec 27, 2005
 

 

Post#6 » by crazyeights » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:46 am

I'm pretty sure in the pre-game tonight they talked about how Farmar averages more minutes in the 4th than anyone, IIRC.

I think that means he's already seen as the clear choice in a Farmar or Fisher debate.

The way I see it, they're just slowly brining him along for him to eventually take the team's reigns. I think though that he doesn't just need more minutes but more responsibility within the offense. But over the last few games I feel that's already begun. Also tonight's 9 assists showed he can do more than just shoot.

As long as D-Fish is playing relatively well, I say keep Farmar at the steady pace they're taking him. They're probably just making sure he doesn't hit a wall before the playoffs.

That's when I see him really taking over. I think Phil's doing a good job bringing him along.
User avatar
CITYOFANGELSX3
RealGM
Posts: 13,011
And1: 151
Joined: May 31, 2007
Location: Southside, Ca
       

 

Post#7 » by CITYOFANGELSX3 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:37 am

I Love farmar
Image
G35
RealGM
Posts: 22,510
And1: 8,066
Joined: Dec 10, 2005
     

 

Post#8 » by G35 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:18 pm

Yeah I like Farmar a lot too but Fisher brings a lot of leadership. Kobe respects him a lot........
I'm so tired of the typical......
User avatar
crackjack
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,825
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 30, 2002
Contact:

 

Post#9 » by crackjack » Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:51 pm

Keep Farmar on the bench, but give him more minutes.

That's a good solution.

I like having Fisher out there to start the game. His leadership helps to maintain that there's not a meltdown early in the game. He can control the other guys on the floor. Provide a calming influence.
That Nicka
Banned User
Posts: 15,350
And1: 34
Joined: Jun 28, 2005
Location: USC

 

Post#10 » by That Nicka » Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:46 pm

Fisher starts, Farmar closes and plays more minutes
User avatar
large1974
Junior
Posts: 423
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 23, 2005
Location: Phoenix
Contact:
     

Farmar Vs The Big Tuna 

Post#11 » by large1974 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:49 pm

Do we really need to go into this? Trust me there will be some games when Farmar dose well and more games when Fish dose well. Currently I think we should adjust to whatever team we are playing and not get into the whole who should start and who should not start. In this pro game its all about match up's and the differance between Phil and other Coaches he finds a way to give teams match up problems. So I guess to answer your question on who should start. I think it all depends on who we are playing.
User avatar
BallAboveAll
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,307
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 02, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#12 » by BallAboveAll » Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:25 pm

Well I like Fish and I think he should continue to start. He's slowed down the last few games or so. But for the most part he's been lights out as far as shooting.

I would trade Farmar for Kidd if it was available. I think Crittenton can possibly have just as much potential as Jordan (Farmar lol).
Erik Eleven
RealGM
Posts: 16,468
And1: 17
Joined: Feb 12, 2005

 

Post#13 » by Erik Eleven » Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:32 pm

crazyeights wrote:I'm pretty sure in the pre-game tonight they talked about how Farmar averages more minutes in the 4th than anyone, IIRC.

I think that means he's already seen as the clear choice in a Farmar or Fisher debate.

The way I see it, they're just slowly brining him along for him to eventually take the team's reigns. I think though that he doesn't just need more minutes but more responsibility within the offense. But over the last few games I feel that's already begun. Also tonight's 9 assists showed he can do more than just shoot.

As long as D-Fish is playing relatively well, I say keep Farmar at the steady pace they're taking him. They're probably just making sure he doesn't hit a wall before the playoffs.

That's when I see him really taking over. I think Phil's doing a good job bringing him along.


I agree 100%
Erik Eleven
RealGM
Posts: 16,468
And1: 17
Joined: Feb 12, 2005

 

Post#14 » by Erik Eleven » Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:33 pm

crackjack wrote:Keep Farmar on the bench, but give him more minutes.

That's a good solution.

I like having Fisher out there to start the game. His leadership helps to maintain that there's not a meltdown early in the game. He can control the other guys on the floor. Provide a calming influence.


I agree 100% :lol:
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,275
And1: 25,456
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#15 » by hermes » Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:37 pm

That Nicka wrote:Fisher starts, Farmar closes and plays more minutes
ya i still think fisher should start
but farmar needs more minutes
User avatar
BallAboveAll
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,307
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 02, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#16 » by BallAboveAll » Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:40 pm

I think Farmar should get more minutes but I'd lean to Fisher in the clutch.
User avatar
TonyMontana
RealGM
Posts: 11,726
And1: 398
Joined: Apr 27, 2006
Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.
     

 

Post#17 » by TonyMontana » Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:43 pm

hermes wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

ya i still think fisher should start
but farmar needs more minutes
Image
Lakers05
Banned User
Posts: 6,098
And1: 4
Joined: Oct 31, 2005

 

Post#18 » by Lakers05 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:11 pm

We don't have the luxury of bringing Farmar along slowly. Games are won and lost on very small differentials in this league(well, at least for the time with Bynum out). You saw what happened against the Cavs.

On average, a differential of 2 points is worth about 5 games for the season. If Farmar is worth 2 points over Fish, then we could be losing as much as 2 games in this stretch by not starting Farmar.
User avatar
J Rob
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,559
And1: 1
Joined: May 03, 2006

 

Post#19 » by J Rob » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:55 pm

Well, so much for finding out if Farmar is worth trading for Kidd or not:

PER WIRETAP:

The Lakers are not going to pursue Jason Kidd

http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/50598/20080130/lakers_not_planning_to_enter_kidd_talks/

Maybe its for the best...Thorn's price always seemed so steep in any Lakers conversations.
SashAlex
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,846
And1: 345
Joined: Aug 01, 2006
Location: Europe, Moldova
Contact:
   

 

Post#20 » by SashAlex » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:55 pm

Yeah ! Jordy should get more minutes !

Return to Los Angeles Lakers