Page 1 of 1
Brown, Turiaf, and Mbenga
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:39 pm
by joe.linnen
Brown, Turiaf, and Mbenga did really good during the game last night.
25pts
20rebs
2ast
1stl
9blk
3to
8pf
Brown
10pts
11reb
4blk
1stl
Mbenga
1pts
1blk
Turiaf
14pts
9reb
2ast
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:42 pm
by xX_BabyBoy_Xx
wow those 3 guys equal 1 Kevin Garnett.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:43 pm
by Sedale Threatt
Thank God Mbenga was there to push them over the top.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:43 pm
by Slava
^^ Lets trade.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:50 pm
by RJM
Thank goodness for DJ Mbenga!
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:07 pm
by Kirk Moon
DJ > Kwame
and Im serious.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:35 pm
by J Rob
Our boys down low stepped up last night.
Especially since in the first half our perimeter defense looked like a revolving door.
The only criticism I have is New York was getting a lot of second chances.
Other than that, Ronny and Kwame did a good job of protecting the basket.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:27 am
by RJM
I think we'll be all right for now if DJ continues to give us this kind of defensive production down low.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:41 am
by CITYOFANGELSX3
Without DJ's 1 point, we might of lost!!!
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:46 am
by dockingsched
gothik wrote:DJ > Kwame
and Im serious.
has dj ever done this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Va7B_Oz7xTY
kwame > all backup centers on socal.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:48 am
by Manexx
gothik wrote:DJ > Kwame
and Im serious.
+1
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:11 am
by slifersd
Knicks shot over 50 percent from the field for most of the game, pardon me for not being impressed by any of their ability to protect the paint.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:48 am
by dockingsched
slifersd wrote:Knicks shot over 50 percent from the field for most of the game, pardon me for not being impressed by any of their ability to protect the paint.
knicks shot 44% for the game. what does it matter if they shot 50% for most of the game? heck, the only reason it was so high was because crawford and robinson were killing the lakers. when the machine put them in check, the percentage went down.
lee, randolph, curry shot 18 for 45, 40%
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:41 am
by slifersd
dcash4 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
knicks shot 44% for the game. what does it matter if they shot 50% for most of the game? heck, the only reason it was so high was because crawford and robinson were killing the lakers. when the machine put them in check, the percentage went down.
lee, randolph, curry shot 18 for 45, 40%
It wasn't just Robinson and Crawford. Daivd Lee grabbed 6 offensive rebounds all by himself. How do you explain that? In the NBA, you can't just play one good quarter and expect to get away with it. The Knicks suck, but when you play against better teams, all three of them need to play with a lot more consistency throughout the game.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:56 am
by millerpig
I think all 3 is not super-star stats producer.
But all 3 have the protential to have a good impact on every game.
I think Phil is waiting to see who can perform well each game.
If either one perfoms better, he will play bigger mintues.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:47 pm
by jimmywolfrey
slifersd wrote:Knicks shot over 50 percent from the field for most of the game, pardon me for not being impressed by any of their ability to protect the paint.
um they were shooting the ball well from the outside..not really dominating the paint at all.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:48 pm
by jimmywolfrey
dcash4 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
knicks shot 44% for the game. what does it matter if they shot 50% for most of the game? heck, the only reason it was so high was because crawford and robinson were killing the lakers. when the machine put them in check, the percentage went down.
lee, randolph, curry shot 18 for 45, 40%
thanks should have read page 2 before i resonded lol.