ImageImageImageImageImage

Stu Lantz

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

Erik Eleven
RealGM
Posts: 16,468
And1: 17
Joined: Feb 12, 2005

Stu Lantz  

Post#1 » by Erik Eleven » Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:41 am

Besides his made up supposed inner monologues of our players, he has a whole lot of sound things to say about the game and the players. I just wanted to bring him up to discussion because I find it a very interesting dynamic to listen to him giving the players realtime theory lessons
User avatar
milesfides
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,012
And1: 1,449
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY

 

Post#2 » by milesfides » Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:52 am

Stu reminds me of the crazy grandpa I never had.

He has always driven me absolutely nuts with his style of commentary, but I will probably be crushed when he's gone.

I actually like him now a lot more then before, when Chick was still alive. I guess he still reminds me of Chick, he's a familiar voice.

Kind of like Roger Ebert. Remember Siskel & Ebert? I thought Siskel was cool and enjoyable to listen to, while Ebert seemed like a total jerk and douchebag. However, once Siskel passed, I liked Ebert a lot more.
“OH! Caruso parachutes in! You cannot stop him - you can only hope to contain him!” -Kevin Harlan, LAL-GSW 4/4/19
Taiwan Killa
Banned User
Posts: 1,027
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 31, 2007

 

Post#3 » by Taiwan Killa » Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:23 am

I like him. I like his little dialogues

-Number 24 says "I'm runnin outta space guys"
-And Ronny just says "It's alright number 24, I got ya" and puts it up with the 2 handed dunk
User avatar
Tesla
Analyst
Posts: 3,240
And1: 104
Joined: Oct 19, 2005
Location: San Diego

 

Post#4 » by Tesla » Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:37 am

I love Stu. He's my favorite annoucer right now, and he's fairly unbiased. I actually like his style... when I watch other games on league pass, and other local annoucers, I usually cringe at how boring, and dull they are... or how excessivley biased they are.

Stu is old, and does repeat a lot of things, it can get annoying, but hey he's old. I rather hear him say the same thing over again from time to time then hear a robot voice.

The one thing I hate about him sometimes is he is a jinx. "Now the one thing the Lakers don't want it a three pointer by "x" over at the corner" ... oops, that exactly just happened. Or... "The Lakers need to be careful with this lead, the last thing they want is "x" to go on a 15-0 run and get back in this game" ... wait, that just happened again... oops. That sometimes drives me nuts, because once he says something bad, it usually happens.
Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more.
-Nikola Tesla
Erik Eleven
RealGM
Posts: 16,468
And1: 17
Joined: Feb 12, 2005

 

Post#5 » by Erik Eleven » Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:29 am

Ha ha ^, that's funny. I think you might have got the cause and effect backwards, though. No jinx in my book. Stu has so much history in the game that it's easy for him to predict based on tendencies he's seen repeating themselves for the last 40 years... But I know what you mean, it's disturbingly often.
User avatar
The Laker Kid
General Manager
Posts: 9,493
And1: 6,959
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA

 

Post#6 » by The Laker Kid » Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:41 am

I know I might get flamed for not liking Stu, but there is something about him that doesn't sound right (post Chick era). Don't get me wrong, I like Stu as a person, but I hate his commentaries (personally)

"One pass...two pass...three pass...oh four pass.... excuse me Mr. Bynum, on the Lakers basketball network.."

Sometimes it's corny, cheesy and the words don't jive. I also think that Stu is an avid Laker homer..

after Bynum's block on a Clipper:
... I guess he hasn't heard of Andrew... he doesn't have cable. I mean, if you have to go in there, go in there with somethin'.. don't go there with that weak stuff.." (Stu talking about the Clipper that Andrew bynum just blocked.)

Personally, I prefer listening to Spero Dedes and Mychal Thompson than Stu Lantz.
MaxwellSmart wrote:I hate to say this, but Go Lakers....
User avatar
BrianFellow_17
Junior
Posts: 441
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 29, 2005
Location: Culver City, CA

 

Post#7 » by BrianFellow_17 » Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:53 am

For the people that don't like Stu, do yourself a favor and order the NBA League Pass for one season. I did that when I was going to school in Michigan and wanted to catch all the Laker games. I never realized just how mediocre/horrible most other announcers are.

For instance, Clippers games. I can't stand listening to Ralph Lawler and his wooden teeth saying "BINGO!!" all the time. That's the lamest **** I have ever heard. Is this a retirement home Saturday night, or is this an NBA basketball game?

Hell, listen to one Boston game with Tommy Heinsohn and then start thanking your lucky stars you don't have to listen to that **** 82 times a year.
Brian Fellow is not an accredited zoologist, nor does he hold an advanced degree in any of the environmental sciences. He is simply an enthusiastic young man with a sixth grade education and an abiding love for all of God's creatures.
User avatar
Tesla
Analyst
Posts: 3,240
And1: 104
Joined: Oct 19, 2005
Location: San Diego

 

Post#8 » by Tesla » Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:55 am

The Laker Kid wrote:
Personally, I prefer listening to Spero Dedes and Mychal Thompson than Stu Lantz.


While we are on the subject of annoucers... I still don't know which team scored when I'm listening to Spero. "OH WHAT A PLAY! SLAM DUNK AND ONE!!! WOW, ##%%@ ... pause..... WHAT A PLAY.... pause...by Shawn Marion.

... Its make me :crazy:
Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more.

-Nikola Tesla
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

 

Post#9 » by DEEP3CL » Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:44 am

Sounds like none of you guys ever heard of Keith Erickson huh ?
Well he was the man with Chick before Stu, he was so bland it was mind boggling he kept the job for 4 or 5 years. I like Stu, he was a good player not great but he averaged double figures in scoring for his career.

Erickson was a less then average player so that tells you he couldn't completely analyze the game in a manner that the average fan needs to understand it. From reading most of the post here it seems you guys are too young to completely understand how Stu comes across.

The man could easily be a coach in the league but he's too smart to get in that chaos.

While were on the subject of Chick's old side kicks did any of you guys know that Al Michaels was also with him in the early 70's, but Chick told him he was too good to be saddled next to him and persuaded him to be a lead broadcaster. He also had Pat Riley for a hot minute before JW pulled him from the booth in the 80's. Bottom line is Stu was better then all those guys, thats why the Lakers hired him away from his gig with CBS.

Stu is good and it's a reason the Lakers haven't replaced him on TV, no one can do it better.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
User avatar
NOODLESTYLE
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,827
And1: 828
Joined: Jun 16, 2005

 

Post#10 » by NOODLESTYLE » Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:49 am

Stu entertains me with his dialog for the players, like when Sasha makes shots he starts saying something like "Sasha is going for Kobe's spot" lol.

Also Stu gets me back into the game when Joel Meyers say something that is incorrect, and you all know what I'm talking about. I hope Joel Meyers goes back to the radio too, I think he's more suitable for that job.
MAMBAEMD
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,001
And1: 1,669
Joined: May 16, 2007
       

 

Post#11 » by MAMBAEMD » Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:56 am

I like Stu.
He is an excellent announcer.
He understands the game inside out.
He doesn't get too high or low.
He is a class act with a great voice.
I think the players respect him a great deal.

Stu is awesome.
User avatar
Tommy Trojan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,447
And1: 36
Joined: Aug 19, 2006
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#12 » by Tommy Trojan » Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:35 pm

I really do enjoy listening to Stu, however if there is the same game on ESPN,ABC,TNT I turn the channel and listen to those guys. Just to mix it up a little, could be fun
second_coming32
Banned User
Posts: 194
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 22, 2008

 

Post#13 » by second_coming32 » Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:38 pm

Stu Lantz is a breath of fresh air. He's a lasting link from the Chick Hearns legacy and I hope he stays on the air for many years to come. If you ever get a sniff of NBA league pass and here commentary around the league, you'll begin to get a sense of how spoiled we are.

The worst that I've heard thus far is the play by play guy for the Hawks....oh my God, that guy is boring...corny, with stereotypical white guy voice (picture Dave Chapelle doing a white guy imitation). The Celtics announcers come a close 2nd, the "Bingo" guy is just awful. I love Stu.
Sedale Threatt
RealGM
Posts: 50,810
And1: 44,813
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.

 

Post#14 » by Sedale Threatt » Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:22 pm

Stu isn't my absolute favorite. But having had the League Pass for three or four years know, trust me when I say that there's plenty worse out there. A LOT worse. In fact, compared to clowns like Tommy Heinsohn (an absolute embarrassment to the profession) and Sean Elliott (smug attitude, nasal voice), Stu is pretty damn excellent.

Personally, I'm not a huge fan of the goofy tangents he goes on. But at the very least he's not a homer, and I definitely appreciate that compared to the majority of NBA color guys. I'd probably rate Stu and Meyers -- who has improved a ton since he was with the Spurs -- in the upper quarter of local announcing crews.

I just wish I could have heard Chick in his prime, instead of the one who pronounced "Medvedenko" 20 different ways in a single broadcast.
User avatar
zen_4_10
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,316
And1: 14
Joined: Feb 02, 2006

 

Post#15 » by zen_4_10 » Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:28 pm

lakerRD wrote:I like Stu.
He is an excellent announcer.
He understands the game inside out.
He doesn't get too high or low.
He is a class act with a great voice.
I think the players respect him a great deal.

Stu is awesome.
User avatar
snaquille oatmeal
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,815
And1: 4,819
Joined: Nov 15, 2005
Location: San Diego
   

 

Post#16 » by snaquille oatmeal » Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:41 pm

Big_Bad_LA wrote:I really do enjoy listening to Stu, however if there is the same game on ESPN,ABC,TNT I turn the channel and listen to those guys. Just to mix it up a little, could be fun
same here, but I do it not for fun but to listen to what others say about the Lakers to a national audience.
Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
User avatar
The Laker Kid
General Manager
Posts: 9,493
And1: 6,959
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA

 

Post#17 » by The Laker Kid » Sun Feb 10, 2008 5:22 pm

Tesla wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



While we are on the subject of annoucers... I still don't know which team scored when I'm listening to Spero. "OH WHAT A PLAY! SLAM DUNK AND ONE!!! WOW, ##%%@ ... pause..... WHAT A PLAY.... pause...by Shawn Marion.

... Its make me :crazy:


OMG That is EXACTLY why I love Spero.. he is so explosive when making calls and makes the game 500% more exciting than it actually is. I LOVE IT!!! For example:

".... rebound Bynum, bounce pass to Turiaf, spins.. who LOBS IT TO KOBE FOR A TOMAHAWK DUNK!!!#@$#%$^ ..."

However when I get home and watch the replay, the SAME PLAY doesn't look so exciting on TV, but Spero made it sound VERY VERY exciting. I love it.. :bowdown:

Return to Los Angeles Lakers