Radman, turning point?
Posted: Mon Apr 7, 2008 6:54 am
"We've been looking for some consistency," Jackson said of his enigmatic Serbian swingman. "We need him to play well, and we want to have some idea of what's going to happen, and whether we can depend on him."
Jackson said he's repeatedly suggested Radmanovic should talk to the Lakers' team psychologist to get to the bottom of his inconsistent effort: "You really need someone to get in there and work on your head."
But Radmanovic was his usual madcap self after the game, joking that he and Jackson had done their own pregame version of "Anger Management," referencing the film starring Lakers fan Jack Nicholson and Adam Sandler. Whatever the cause, the results showed up in his best game of the season.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=280406023
Radmanovic played so well tonight, I have to assume something happened, somewhere. That's when I came across the recap from espn that posted above. Did Phil finally get through to Radman?
A guy who could put up 0 rebounds in 25 minutes of play grabbed 14 boards tonight.
I really don't get what's up with this guy. He goes so weak towards the basket, his layup attempts are afterthoughts. He makes Derek Fisher look like Tony Parker. Then sometimes he'll cram it in for a surprising athletic dunk. On defense, this guy can watch opponents make layups - literally stop and watch, and sometimes he challenges shots very well.
Sometimes he just looks like he doesn't care about the game, his teammates, or winning at all. Like he doesn't want to play basketball. This is infuriating to me, as a fan. What's worse than a guy who sucks and doesn't care? A guy who can be good, but doesn't care. That's just something spiteful in that.
And yet, out of nowhere, he CAN play a great game. But nothing he did tonight was a fluke. He's 6-10, he could be active on the boards if he wanted to. He can stroke shots, that's not a surprise. But he hustled a lot better - he was just into the game. Like he was actually playing basketball instead of his jogging half-assedness of every other night.
Now, considering this guy plays 1 good game for 10 bad ones, at least in my book, I'm not ready to believe he's turned the corner yet. But I have to say, considering the context of his play, following Phil Jackson's apparent challenge to him, I'm at least hopeful that better things are in store for Radmanovic.
I still don't get him, I don't understand him at all, but I just hope he plays hard, every night, like so many of his teammates who are busting their asses out there. Actually, I don't think he even played that hard tonight, but behold, the benefits of some effort.
Jackson said he's repeatedly suggested Radmanovic should talk to the Lakers' team psychologist to get to the bottom of his inconsistent effort: "You really need someone to get in there and work on your head."
But Radmanovic was his usual madcap self after the game, joking that he and Jackson had done their own pregame version of "Anger Management," referencing the film starring Lakers fan Jack Nicholson and Adam Sandler. Whatever the cause, the results showed up in his best game of the season.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=280406023
Radmanovic played so well tonight, I have to assume something happened, somewhere. That's when I came across the recap from espn that posted above. Did Phil finally get through to Radman?
A guy who could put up 0 rebounds in 25 minutes of play grabbed 14 boards tonight.
I really don't get what's up with this guy. He goes so weak towards the basket, his layup attempts are afterthoughts. He makes Derek Fisher look like Tony Parker. Then sometimes he'll cram it in for a surprising athletic dunk. On defense, this guy can watch opponents make layups - literally stop and watch, and sometimes he challenges shots very well.
Sometimes he just looks like he doesn't care about the game, his teammates, or winning at all. Like he doesn't want to play basketball. This is infuriating to me, as a fan. What's worse than a guy who sucks and doesn't care? A guy who can be good, but doesn't care. That's just something spiteful in that.
And yet, out of nowhere, he CAN play a great game. But nothing he did tonight was a fluke. He's 6-10, he could be active on the boards if he wanted to. He can stroke shots, that's not a surprise. But he hustled a lot better - he was just into the game. Like he was actually playing basketball instead of his jogging half-assedness of every other night.
Now, considering this guy plays 1 good game for 10 bad ones, at least in my book, I'm not ready to believe he's turned the corner yet. But I have to say, considering the context of his play, following Phil Jackson's apparent challenge to him, I'm at least hopeful that better things are in store for Radmanovic.
I still don't get him, I don't understand him at all, but I just hope he plays hard, every night, like so many of his teammates who are busting their asses out there. Actually, I don't think he even played that hard tonight, but behold, the benefits of some effort.