MSNBC Article: Game 4 of WCF was fixed!!
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 6:34 pm
CLICKY
The evidence this guy gives is outlandish. Also you can tell he is biased toward the champs.
In post-Donaghy era, evidence just seems to pile up
The evidence this guy gives is outlandish. Also you can tell he is biased toward the champs.
First came the no-call on Kobe Bryant
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 6:53 pm
ibtl
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 6:55 pm
everyone has to get their two cents in, people interpret everything differently, they'll see what they want to see
the fact is the lakers won, they aren't going to go back and change that so its time to move on to the next game
the fact is the lakers won, they aren't going to go back and change that so its time to move on to the next game
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 7:01 pm
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 7:29 pm
yeah bunch of crap
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:11 pm
wtf ?
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:38 pm
Sounds like someone has been drinking some sour grape flavored Haterade.
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:47 pm
and then there was Timmy's dunk where he caught the ball just inside the three point line and supposedly made it to the basket in two steps...i could go on all day about bad calls BOTH ways...what about kobe being repeatedly bumped, grabbed and even fouled in mid air while attempting shots...blah, blah, blah...
i have never been a fan of the officiating in the NBA and it only seems worse in the playoffs with every possession magnified and scrutinized more heavilly...it is what it is...
i have never been a fan of the officiating in the NBA and it only seems worse in the playoffs with every possession magnified and scrutinized more heavilly...it is what it is...
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:50 pm
NBC Sports
An oxymoronic phrase.
An oxymoronic phrase.
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 9:29 pm
Just because it's on msnbc doesn't mean it has any more credibility than a RealGM poster. It's just some guy with an opinion, like all of us here. It's a lousy opinion, but being an idiot is his right. I won't click your link though. Why give him the attention he's seeking.
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 9:34 pm
I'll lock this thread yup not because its a bad thread, but because it can be discussed in other threads already open (and prevent clutter), and nothing really debatable or worth discussing has come out of it through the replies.
-Kno
-Kno
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 9:48 pm
The Society of Professional Journalists wrote:
Preamble
Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist's credibility. Members of the Society share a dedication to ethical behavior and adopt this code to declare the Society's principles and standards of practice.
Seek Truth and Report It
Journalists should be honest, fair and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.
Journalists should: