ImageImageImageImageImage

Jamal Crawford

Moderators: TyCobb, Danny Darko, Kilroy

joe.linnen
Banned User
Posts: 3,272
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 25, 2006
Location: Fresno

Jamal Crawford 

Post#1 » by joe.linnen » Sat May 23, 2009 4:54 am

I know many of you will say no, but would he fit into the role of a Phil Jackson point gurad. I know he can knock down shots and has bad shot selections at times, but I have one question about his defence is it good or bad? If he were to opt out should we go after him?


SF:Bryant/Ariza/Morrison
PF:Gasol/Odom/Walton
C:Bynum/Powell
SG:Crawford/Vujacic
PG:Fisher/Farmar/Brown

This would also allow us to play Bryant at Small Forward at time too. So what do you guys think about this? Yes or No and your reason.
User avatar
KObe Bryant
Analyst
Posts: 3,686
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 13, 2006
Location: Earth

Re: Jamal Crawford 

Post#2 » by KObe Bryant » Sat May 23, 2009 5:10 am

I don't know. Just like what I've been saying, if we lose this year then we lose Bryant, Ariza and Odom.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 55,742
And1: 21,675
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Jamal Crawford 

Post#3 » by dockingsched » Sat May 23, 2009 5:49 am

last time i merged your thread, this time i'll lock it. please repost in the offseason moves thread.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore

Return to Los Angeles Lakers