I know many of you will say no, but would he fit into the role of a Phil Jackson point gurad. I know he can knock down shots and has bad shot selections at times, but I have one question about his defence is it good or bad? If he were to opt out should we go after him?
SF:Bryant/Ariza/Morrison
PF:Gasol/Odom/Walton
C:Bynum/Powell
SG:Crawford/Vujacic
PG:Fisher/Farmar/Brown
This would also allow us to play Bryant at Small Forward at time too. So what do you guys think about this? Yes or No and your reason.
Jamal Crawford
Moderators: TyCobb, Danny Darko, Kilroy
Jamal Crawford
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,272
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 25, 2006
- Location: Fresno
Re: Jamal Crawford
- KObe Bryant
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,686
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 13, 2006
- Location: Earth
Re: Jamal Crawford
I don't know. Just like what I've been saying, if we lose this year then we lose Bryant, Ariza and Odom.
Re: Jamal Crawford
- dockingsched
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 55,742
- And1: 21,675
- Joined: Aug 02, 2005
Re: Jamal Crawford
last time i merged your thread, this time i'll lock it. please repost in the offseason moves thread.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore