ImageImageImageImageImage

No #1 picks for 3 years

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

laduane1
Banned User
Posts: 2,216
And1: 29
Joined: Jul 04, 2008

No #1 picks for 3 years 

Post#1 » by laduane1 » Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:14 am

Without a #1 pick last year, this year and next year. Will this hurt the Lakers in a few years when the young players would have been getting more time. We need to win now and next year another run at a ring could be ours. Just wonder not having those low #1 picks on the end of the bench will hurt the future of the Lakers.
LAKESHOW
RealGM
Posts: 18,043
And1: 4,468
Joined: Mar 14, 2002
Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!

Re: No #1 picks for 3 years 

Post#2 » by LAKESHOW » Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:49 am

i think we have enough to get us into position for a 3peat. getting it however will be extremely difficult. the toughest 3peat out of all of the attempts by jax.
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
daddyfivestar
Banned User
Posts: 5,215
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
Location: Get to 17 while they are still on 17

Re: No #1 picks for 3 years 

Post#3 » by daddyfivestar » Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:20 am

well judging from the last several years of picks -
No pick '08
Javaris Crittenton '07
Jordan Farmar '06
Andrew Bynum '05
Sasha Vujacic '04
Brian Cook '03
Kareem Rush (via Chris Jeffries) '02
No pick '01
Mark Madsen '00
Devean George '99
Sam Jacobson '98
No pick '97

The Lakers don't need first rounders to be contenders. In fact, they usually wiff altogether or get bench level at best guys. No biggie on the dumping of the picks.

Only Bynum is worth a shot, and he's at the make/break point.

Vujacic is hitting us for 5 mil - wouldn't that be better used on an MLE FA?
Same as DGeorge and BCook did to us earlier. Luckily they're gone.
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: No #1 picks for 3 years 

Post#4 » by DEEP3CL » Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:40 am

^ I agree with daddyfivestar. Besides you have to look at the depth of the drafts, and by all accounts there won't be many that will be laden with talent.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
ShowtimeFan
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,467
And1: 63
Joined: Oct 07, 2007
Location: Floor seats next to Jack

Re: No #1 picks for 3 years 

Post#5 » by ShowtimeFan » Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:00 am

Why concentrate on what the Lakers DON'T have?

I prefer to look at what they DO have...

And that is a fine team poised to repeat (and three-peat)
alfurd
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,706
And1: 5
Joined: Mar 13, 2002
Location: Markham
   

Re: No #1 picks for 3 years 

Post#6 » by alfurd » Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:03 am

Too early to tell whether owning picks at the bottom of the first round this year and last year could've helped pick up a good player, but so far it seems like owning them wouldn't have done much.

On a positive note, there's a decent chance that the Lakers will have a high second round pick next draft thanks to the Grizzlies. It might as well be a low first rounder... but better. I think the following link is accurate:

http://www.realgm.com/src_future_draftp ... #la_lakers

Return to Los Angeles Lakers


cron