Post#20 » by So Gutta » Sat Dec 5, 2009 8:20 pm
Hey, if Mitch can turn Kwame into Pau then anything's possible...
I'm not sure why any team woud even consider taking Vujacic at this point. His contract is our worst, and it's GLARING! I'm sure Mitch would be abolutely elated to move him.
At least Morrison has expiring contract and a scrub team might want to give Ammo some PT just to see what he's capable of. He simply can't crack our rotation and it's questionable whether or not the Lakers would even make him an offer in the offseason (If they did, it would be half of what he's making now, obviously). A team looking to make a free-agent splash next offseason might actually want Ammo's contract. This might even be our most valuable asset.
I'm not sure I would trade Farmar unless it's an offer too good to refuse. Farmar has some skills, and good, young PGs are a tough find. Farmar seems to have found some confidence again, and the fact that he will be a restricted free-agent next offseason is motivating him. I guess it all depends on whether or not the Lakers FO see Farmar and Brown as our long-term PG solution.
I guess the catch-22 would be that if we are trading for somebody, we would have to take on their matching salary, so we wouldn't really be cutting payroll. If we are trying to cut payroll, then I think that Mitch is saying he would LOVE to move Sasha and Luke for comprable players with shorter contractual obligations. I think Luke Walton might have some decent trade value.
I would love to get some crappy teams' future first round pick somehow.... I actually don't think the Lakers are too concerned with payroll based on some of Buss' comments lately.
I was thinking that this could be a smokescreen by Mitch, hoping to get some scrub teams to bite on some of our bench players, and we can try to find another diamond-in-the-rough (Ariza, Brown, ect.)
"Put five thousand bucks on the Lakers." --Krusty The Clown